Tests – · none yet Owners 43 · 18 reviews
Falken ZIEX ZE001 A/S vs Yokohama Geolandar X-CV G057 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 18 + 16 owner reviews. How we score
Geolandar X-CV G057 is ahead, 70–53
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 69 · 16 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
55
Dry
Geolandar X-CV G057 +2075Why this score
Source ZIEX ZE001 A/S Geolandar X-CV G057 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 60 (est.) ≈ 72 (est.) Reviews found online 49 78 ZIEX ZE001 A/S: 60% × 59.9 (est.) + 40% × 48.6 = 55
Geolandar X-CV G057: 60% × 72.2 (est.) + 40% × 78.3 = 75
No road tests of dry for ZIEX ZE001 A/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
No road tests of dry for Geolandar X-CV G057. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
54
Wet
Geolandar X-CV G057 +2377Why this score
Source ZIEX ZE001 A/S Geolandar X-CV G057 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 58 (est.) ≈ 75 (est.) Reviews found online 48 79 ZIEX ZE001 A/S: 60% × 58.1 (est.) + 40% × 47.7 = 54
Geolandar X-CV G057: 60% × 75.2 (est.) + 40% × 78.9 = 77
No road tests of wet for ZIEX ZE001 A/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for Geolandar X-CV G057. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
61
Snow
ZIEX ZE001 A/S +1150Why this score
Source ZIEX ZE001 A/S Geolandar X-CV G057 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 65 (est.) ≈ 60 (est.) Reviews found online 54 36 ZIEX ZE001 A/S: 60% × 65.3 (est.) + 40% × 54 = 61
Geolandar X-CV G057: 60% × 59.7 (est.) + 40% × 36.3 = 50
No road tests of snow for ZIEX ZE001 A/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
No road tests of snow for Geolandar X-CV G057. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
54
Comfort
Geolandar X-CV G057 +1872Why this score
Source ZIEX ZE001 A/S Geolandar X-CV G057 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 64 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 47 74 ZIEX ZE001 A/S: 40% × 64.2 (est.) + 60% × 46.6 = 54
Geolandar X-CV G057: 40% × 69.7 (est.) + 60% × 73.5 = 72
No road tests of comfort for ZIEX ZE001 A/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.21).
No road tests of comfort for Geolandar X-CV G057. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.21).
-
62
Noise
Geolandar X-CV G057 +769Why this score
Source ZIEX ZE001 A/S Geolandar X-CV G057 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 55 73 ZIEX ZE001 A/S: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 54.5 = 62
Geolandar X-CV G057: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 72.8 = 69
No road tests of noise for ZIEX ZE001 A/S or Geolandar X-CV G057. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
40
Treadwear
Geolandar X-CV G057 +2666Why this score
Source ZIEX ZE001 A/S Geolandar X-CV G057 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 51 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 23 65 ZIEX ZE001 A/S: 60% × 51.1 (est.) + 40% × 23.4 = 40
Geolandar X-CV G057: 60% × 66 (est.) + 40% × 65 = 66
No road tests of treadwear for ZIEX ZE001 A/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for Geolandar X-CV G057. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
42
Handling (owners)
Geolandar X-CV G057 +3476Why this score
Source ZIEX ZE001 A/S Geolandar X-CV G057 Reviews found online 42 76
Scores at a glance
| Category | Falken ZIEX ZE001 A/S | Yokohama Geolandar X-CV G057 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 53 | 70 |
| Dry | 55 | 75 |
| Wet | 54 | 77 |
| Snow | 61 | 50 |
| Comfort | 54 | 72 |
| Noise | 62 | 69 |
| Treadwear | 40 | 66 |
| Handling (owners) | 42 | 76 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
ZIEX ZE001 A/S
Geolandar X-CV G057
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A ZIEX ZE001 A/S
Pros
- Quiet, comfortable ride, noted by several owners including a long-distance highway driver
- Good dry grip and handling, with several reviewers describing wet performance as impressive or confident
- Stable, composed behavior and good steering feedback in everyday driving, with one reviewer calling it a capable all-rounder that is not aimed at sporting use
Cons
- Premature tread wear is the most frequent complaint, with reports of tires nearly bald or needing replacement at roughly 34-36K miles, and fast wear noted at 13K miles, 15,000 km and 20,000 km
- Poor traction in snow, slush and ice, with some reviewers advising against use below 0°C
- Wet-weather concerns in some cases, including hydroplaning resistance described as dangerous on a turbo Mazda 6 and looser handling in the wet late in the tire's life
Tire B Geolandar X-CV G057
Pros
- Exceptional wet grip and road confidence in rainy conditions
- Quiet and comfortable ride quality
- Crisp handling and responsive steering performance
Cons
- Some users report faster-than-expected tread wear
- Firm ride quality noted on certain crossover fitments
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Falken ZIEX ZE001 A/S | B · Yokohama Geolandar X-CV G057 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season | All-Season Premium Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 6 | 64 |
| Rim diameters | 17″ – 20″ | 17″ – 22″ |
| Tread depth | 10/32″ | 11/32″ |
| UTQG | 360 A A | 520 A A |
| Treadwear warranty | — | 50,000 mi |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | 51 psi | 50 psi |
| Sizes in common | 2 | 2 |
Which one should you actually buy?
Falken ZIEX ZE001 A/S
Yokohama Geolandar X-CV G057
Winner: Yokohama Geolandar X-CV G057 — better handling, treadwear and wet. Pick the Falken ZIEX ZE001 A/S if snow matters most to you. Falken ZIEX ZE001 A/S rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 18 reviews), so read this result as provisional. Yokohama Geolandar X-CV G057 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 16 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Yokohama Geolandar X-CV G057 scores 76 vs 42 on handling.
Yokohama Geolandar X-CV G057 scores 66 vs 40 on treadwear.
Yokohama Geolandar X-CV G057 scores 77 vs 54 on wet.
Yokohama Geolandar X-CV G057 scores 75 vs 55 on dry.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
ZIEX ZE001 A/S or Geolandar X-CV G057?
Which is better in the wet, ZIEX ZE001 A/S or Geolandar X-CV G057?
Yokohama Geolandar X-CV G057, 77 vs 54 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, ZIEX ZE001 A/S or Geolandar X-CV G057?
Yokohama Geolandar X-CV G057, 75 vs 55 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, ZIEX ZE001 A/S or Geolandar X-CV G057?
Falken ZIEX ZE001 A/S, 61 vs 50 on our snow score.
Which is quieter, ZIEX ZE001 A/S or Geolandar X-CV G057?
Yokohama Geolandar X-CV G057, 69 vs 62 on our noise score.
Which is more comfortable, ZIEX ZE001 A/S or Geolandar X-CV G057?
Yokohama Geolandar X-CV G057, 72 vs 54 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, ZIEX ZE001 A/S or Geolandar X-CV G057?
Yokohama Geolandar X-CV G057, 66 vs 40 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology