Head-to-head Updated

Michelin Defender T+H vs Falken ZIEX ZE001 A/S — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 1 + 0 road tests and 1 + 17 owner reviews. How we score

Defender T+H is ahead, 70–53

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Michelin Defender T+H
Tire AMichelin

Defender T+H

Premium Touring All Season tire

± 8Provisional

Tests – · 1 test Owners 69 · 1 review

Best test result: #1 of 8 in 2022 Consumer Reports All-Season Tires (tested tread life (miles))

Falken ZIEX ZE001 A/S
Tire BFalken

ZIEX ZE001 A/S

All Season

± 8Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 43 · 17 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 70

    Dry

    Defender T+H +15
    55
    Why this score
    SourceDefender T+HZIEX ZE001 A/S
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 60 (est.)
    Reviews found online7148

    Defender T+H: 60% × 69.3 (est.) + 40% × 70.9 = 70

    ZIEX ZE001 A/S: 60% × 59.6 (est.) + 40% × 48 = 55

    No road tests of dry for Defender T+H. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

    No road tests of dry for ZIEX ZE001 A/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 73

    Wet

    Defender T+H +19
    54
    Why this score
    SourceDefender T+HZIEX ZE001 A/S
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 72 (est.)≈ 58 (est.)
    Reviews found online7347

    Defender T+H: 60% × 72.2 (est.) + 40% × 73.4 = 73

    ZIEX ZE001 A/S: 60% × 57.8 (est.) + 40% × 47.3 = 54

    No road tests of wet for Defender T+H. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for ZIEX ZE001 A/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 65

    Snow

    Defender T+H +5
    60
    Why this score
    SourceDefender T+HZIEX ZE001 A/S
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 65 (est.)
    Reviews found online6254

    Defender T+H: 60% × 67.5 (est.) + 40% × 62.1 = 65

    ZIEX ZE001 A/S: 60% × 64.5 (est.) + 40% × 54.1 = 60

    No road tests of snow for Defender T+H. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

    No road tests of snow for ZIEX ZE001 A/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

  4. 68

    Comfort

    Defender T+H +14
    54
    Why this score
    SourceDefender T+HZIEX ZE001 A/S
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 65 (est.)
    Reviews found online6747

    Defender T+H: 40% × 68.7 (est.) + 60% × 67 = 68

    ZIEX ZE001 A/S: 40% × 65.1 (est.) + 60% × 47.1 = 54

    No road tests of comfort for Defender T+H or ZIEX ZE001 A/S. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. –

    Noise

    No comparison
    62
    Why this score
    SourceDefender T+HZIEX ZE001 A/S
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online–55

    ZIEX ZE001 A/S: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 54.8 = 62

    No road tests of noise for ZIEX ZE001 A/S. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 73

    Treadwear

    Defender T+H +34
    39
    Why this score
    SourceDefender T+HZIEX ZE001 A/S
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests76≈ 51 (est.)
    Reviews found online6821

    Defender T+H: 60% × 76.1 + 40% × 68 = 73

    ZIEX ZE001 A/S: 60% × 50.5 (est.) + 40% × 21.2 = 39

    No road tests of treadwear for ZIEX ZE001 A/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

  7. –

    Handling (owners)

    No comparison
    42
    Why this score
    SourceDefender T+HZIEX ZE001 A/S
    Reviews found online–42
Scores at a glance
Michelin Defender T+H vs Falken ZIEX ZE001 A/S: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryMichelin Defender T+HFalken ZIEX ZE001 A/S
Relative Score 70 53
Dry 70 55
Wet 73 54
Snow 65 60
Comfort 68 54
Noise – 62
Treadwear 73 39
Handling (owners) – 42

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

Defender T+H

± 8

ZIEX ZE001 A/S

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Defender T+H

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

Tire B ZIEX ZE001 A/S

Pros

  • Quiet and comfortable ride quality
  • Reliable dry-road traction and handling
  • Satisfactory performance for daily commuting and highway driving

Cons

  • Rapid and premature tread wear
  • Poor traction and confidence in snow and icy conditions
  • Low hydroplaning resistance in heavy rain
All owner themes in the ZIEX ZE001 A/S review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Michelin Defender T+H B · Falken ZIEX ZE001 A/S
CategoryPremium Touring All Season tireAll Season
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4SUV and 4x4
Sizes available—6
Rim diameters—17″ – 20″
Tread depth—10/32″
UTQG—360 A A
Sidewall—Blackwall
Max pressure—51 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

Michelin Defender T+H

Falken ZIEX ZE001 A/S

Winner: Michelin Defender T+H — better treadwear, wet and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score. Michelin Defender T+H rests on little evidence so far (1 test, 1 review), so read this result as provisional. Falken ZIEX ZE001 A/S rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 17 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Michelin Defender T+H scores 73 vs 39 on treadwear.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Michelin Defender T+H scores 73 vs 54 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Michelin Defender T+H scores 70 vs 55 on dry.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Michelin Defender T+H scores 68 vs 54 on comfort.

Tire A · Michelin Defender T+H
Tire B · Falken ZIEX ZE001 A/S

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Defender T+H or ZIEX ZE001 A/S?

Which is better in the wet, Defender T+H or ZIEX ZE001 A/S?

Michelin Defender T+H, 73 vs 54 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Defender T+H or ZIEX ZE001 A/S?

Michelin Defender T+H, 70 vs 55 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, Defender T+H or ZIEX ZE001 A/S?

Michelin Defender T+H, 65 vs 60 on our snow score.

Which is more comfortable, Defender T+H or ZIEX ZE001 A/S?

Michelin Defender T+H, 68 vs 54 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Defender T+H or ZIEX ZE001 A/S?

Michelin Defender T+H, 73 vs 39 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology