Tests 77 · 21 tests Owners 66 · 1,241 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 21 in 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test (straight aquaplaning)
“Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun, very grippy especially in the wet”
Head-to-head
Updated
Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun vs Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 21 + 23 road tests and 1,241 + 5,925 owner reviews. How we score
EfficientGrip Performance 2 is ahead, 85–72
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 87 · 23 tests Owners 83 · 5,925 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 21 in 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test (wear)
“Advice on new tyres So my car got stolen (RIP) and I bought a 16' MB c200d with rears 245/40r18 Its time to change them and I don't know what to do. A/S are not needed because snow is very rare in central Spain. Winter temperatures range between 0-10°C and summer range from 30 to 40. As I drive 25-30000 km per year I especially value wet performance and durability (Minimum 35-40000 km). The problem is, the tyres that would fit perfectlly to me are not available in this size (GY efficient grip performance 2 -best tyres i've ever had- and Michelin Primacy 5). What i've seen is Firestone (both roadhawk 2 and roadhawk sport), continental PC7, GY assy 6, Michelin PS5, bridgestone T6, Dunlop sport TG, kormoran/tigar/Taurus summer 2, nexen sport, hancook (Ventus evo 137 and Ventus prime 4) and kumho ps72. Even though It would be nice to save some money, i'm worried about losing rear grip when wet (its my first rwd) so its not important. What would you pick? Read more”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
Key facts
- In 13 tests that measured dry braking for both, ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun won 8 and EfficientGrip Performance 2 won 5 (average 96% vs 96% of the best).
- In 13 tests that measured wet braking for both, ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun won 9 and EfficientGrip Performance 2 won 4 (average 93% vs 92% of the best).
- In 10 tests that measured straight aquaplaning for both, ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun won 9 and EfficientGrip Performance 2 won 1 (average 98% vs 95% of the best).
- In 9 tests that measured noise for both, ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun won 4 and EfficientGrip Performance 2 won 5 (average 98% vs 99% of the best).
- In 8 tests that measured wet handling for both, ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun won 1 and EfficientGrip Performance 2 won 7 (average 97% vs 98% of the best).
-
74
Dry
EfficientGrip Performance 2 +882Why this score
Source ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun EfficientGrip Performance 2 Professional tests (TWG score) · 20 / 21 tests 79 81 Reviews found online 67 83 Dry Braking (% of best) · 13 shared tests · wins 8–5 96% 96% Dry Handling (% of best) · 7 shared tests · wins 3–3 99% 99% Dry Handling (tester's mark) (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–0 94% 92% Dry (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–1 92% 97% ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun: 60% × 79.4 + 40% × 66.7 = 74
EfficientGrip Performance 2: 60% × 80.7 + 40% × 83 = 82
-
79
Wet
EfficientGrip Performance 2 +483Why this score
Source ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun EfficientGrip Performance 2 Professional tests (TWG score) · 20 / 21 tests 85 83 Reviews found online 70 84 Curved Aquaplaning (% of best) · 5 shared tests · wins 3–2 93% 92% Straight Aquaplaning (% of best) · 10 shared tests · wins 9–1 98% 95% Wet (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–0 97% 96% Wet Braking (% of best) · 13 shared tests · wins 9–4 93% 92% Wet Braking (concrete) (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 2–0 93% 91% Wet Circle (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–1 98% 99% Wet Handling (% of best) · 8 shared tests · wins 1–7 97% 98% ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun: 60% × 85.5 + 40% × 69.6 = 79
EfficientGrip Performance 2: 60% × 82.7 + 40% × 84.3 = 83
-
62
Comfort
EfficientGrip Performance 2 +1981Why this score
Source ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun EfficientGrip Performance 2 Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / 4 tests 60 84 Reviews found online 63 79 Comfort (tester's mark) (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–1 93% 100% ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun: 40% × 60.5 + 60% × 62.7 = 62
EfficientGrip Performance 2: 40% × 84.3 + 60% × 78.5 = 81
-
66
Noise
EfficientGrip Performance 2 +975Why this score
Source ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun EfficientGrip Performance 2 Professional tests (TWG score) · 14 / 13 tests 66 81 Reviews found online ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Noise (% of best) · 9 shared tests · wins 4–5 98% 99% ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun: 60% × 66 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 66
EfficientGrip Performance 2: 60% × 80.7 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 75
No owner ratings of noise for ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun or EfficientGrip Performance 2. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
-
69
Treadwear
EfficientGrip Performance 2 +2594Why this score
Source ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun EfficientGrip Performance 2 Professional tests (TWG score) · 6 / 7 tests 73 100 Reviews found online 63 85 Abrasion (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 0–2 56% 75% Wear (% of best) · 5 shared tests · wins 0–5 65% 98% ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun: 60% × 72.7 + 40% × 63 = 69
EfficientGrip Performance 2: 60% × 100 + 40% × 84.8 = 94
-
66
Handling (owners)
EfficientGrip Performance 2 +1581Why this score
Source ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun EfficientGrip Performance 2 Reviews found online 66 81 -
32
Efficiency
EfficientGrip Performance 2 +5890Why this score
Source ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun EfficientGrip Performance 2 Professional tests (TWG score) · 15 / 17 tests 32 90 Fuel Consumption (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 0–2 94% 97% Rolling Resistance (% of best) · 8 shared tests · wins 1–7 78% 92%
Scores at a glance
| Category | Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun | Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 72 | 85 |
| Dry | 74 | 82 |
| Wet | 79 | 83 |
| Comfort | 62 | 81 |
| Noise | 66 | 75 |
| Treadwear | 69 | 94 |
| Handling (owners) | 66 | 81 |
| Efficiency | 32 | 90 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
72
/ 100
ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
85
/ 100
EfficientGrip Performance 2
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
In the overall rankings of 17 tests that ran both, Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun finished ahead 3 times and Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 14 times.
| Discipline | Category | ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun | EfficientGrip Performance 2 | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry | Dry | 92% | 97% | −5.1 | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2022 Al Volante Summer Tire Test R16 · 205/60R16 |
| Dry Braking | Dry | 96% | 96% | 0.0 | 8–5 in 13 shared tests Newest: 2025 Motor Low Rolling Resistance (AA) Tyre Test · 205/55 R16 |
| Dry Handling | Dry | 99% | 99% | +0.2 | 3–3 in 7 shared tests Newest: 2025 Motor Low Rolling Resistance (AA) Tyre Test · 205/55 R16 |
| Dry Handling (tester's mark) | Dry | 94% | 92% | +2.9 | 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2025 Motor Low Rolling Resistance (AA) Tyre Test · 205/55 R16 |
| Curved Aquaplaning | Wet | 93% | 92% | +0.9 | 3–2 in 5 shared tests Newest: 2025 Motor Low Rolling Resistance (AA) Tyre Test · 205/55 R16 |
| Straight Aquaplaning | Wet | 98% | 95% | +2.5 | 9–1 in 10 shared tests Newest: 2025 Motor Low Rolling Resistance (AA) Tyre Test · 205/55 R16 |
| Wet | Wet | 97% | 96% | +1.0 | 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2022 Al Volante Summer Tire Test R16 · 205/60R16 |
| Wet Braking | Wet | 93% | 92% | +0.9 | 9–4 in 13 shared tests Newest: 2025 Motor Low Rolling Resistance (AA) Tyre Test · 205/55 R16 |
| Wet Braking (concrete) | Wet | 93% | 91% | +2.5 | 2–0 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2024 ADAC Summer Tyre Test · 215/55 R17 |
| Wet Circle | Wet | 98% | 99% | −0.4 | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test · 215/55 R17 |
| Wet Handling | Wet | 97% | 98% | −1.0 | 1–7 in 8 shared tests Newest: 2025 Motor Low Rolling Resistance (AA) Tyre Test · 205/55 R16 |
| Wet Handling (tester's mark) | Wet | 70% #8/11 · 2019 AMS Summer SUV Tyre Test | 88% #2/6 · 2024 ACE/ARBÖ/GTÜ Summer Tire Test R17 | – | Different tests |
| Comfort (tester's mark) | Comfort | 93% | 100% | −7.1 | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2025 Motor Low Rolling Resistance (AA) Tyre Test · 205/55 R16 |
| Noise | Noise | 98% | 99% | −0.9 | 4–5 in 9 shared tests Newest: 2025 Motor Low Rolling Resistance (AA) Tyre Test · 205/55 R16 |
| Abrasion | Treadwear | 56% | 75% | −18.3 | 0–2 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2024 ADAC Summer Tyre Test · 215/55 R17 |
| Wear | Treadwear | 65% | 98% | −33.6 | 0–5 in 5 shared tests Newest: 2024 ADAC Summer Tyre Test · 215/55 R17 |
| Fuel Consumption | Efficiency | 94% | 97% | −3.3 | 0–2 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2024 ADAC Summer Tyre Test · 215/55 R17 |
| Rolling Resistance | Efficiency | 78% | 92% | −13.5 | 1–7 in 8 shared tests Newest: 2025 Motor Low Rolling Resistance (AA) Tyre Test · 205/55 R16 |
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Price | Cost | 83% | 67% | +15.1 | 3–0 in 3 shared tests Newest: 2024 ADAC Summer Tyre Test · 215/55 R17 |
| Total Cost of Ownership | Cost | #13/20 | #1/20 | – | 0–3 in 3 shared tests Newest: 2024 AutoBild Summer Tyre Test · 205/55 R16 |
| Value | Cost | 68% | 85% | −16.8 | 0–5 in 5 shared tests Newest: 2024 ADAC Summer Tyre Test · 215/55 R17 |
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #3/6 | #2/6 | – | 3–14 in 17 shared tests Newest: 2025 Wybór Kierowców Summer Tire Test R16 · 205/55R16 |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
Pros
- Exceptionally low road noise and high cabin comfort
- Strong grip and stability in both wet and dry weather conditions
- Outstanding value for money compared to premium brands
Cons
- Some drivers report higher rolling resistance and slightly increased fuel consumption
- Soft sidewalls can lead to vague initial steering response or a less sporty feel during hard cornering
- Occasional complaints of a firmer, harsher ride over bumps depending on vehicle suspension and aspect ratio
Tire B EfficientGrip Performance 2
Pros
- Exceptional tread longevity and mileage capability
- Quiet operation and high cabin comfort
- Strong grip and predictable handling in both wet and dry conditions
Cons
- Soft sidewalls can cause steering vagueness or body roll during aggressive cornering
- Some users report increased tire noise or resonance as the tread wears down
- Occasional complaints regarding weaker wet braking or traction compared to dedicated sports tires
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Tire A
Positive
Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
Community sentiment regarding the Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun is generally positive, with specific praise noted for its strong wet grip. Users frequently evaluate it as an affordable alternative alongside other budget-friendly options for smaller or standard passenger vehicles.
Top themes
#wet weather performance#budget friendly options#tire size availability#grip and handling#eco-run efficiency
Based on 5 community posts
Tire B
Positive
Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2
Community opinion on the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 is largely positive, with users frequently praising its exceptional wet performance, high durability, and overall comfort. Some users note that its soft sidewalls can make it feel less sharp during spirited cornering, but it remains a top choice for efficiency, braking, and longevity.
r/tires
·1 upvote ·2024-11-10
“17" Goodyear efficient grip performance 2 small leak Hi, On my VW Touran 2019, 1.5 TSI, 17" alu oem wheels I have set Goodyear efficient grip performance 2 . There is a small leak lets say the pressure goes fro m 2.5psi to 2 psi in approx 7-10 days. The VW tpms warns me usually every 2-3 weeks. Those are summer tires, I just removed them for swapping with winter ones and I haven't cleaned them yet. They are quite dirty at the moment. The leaking one, pictured, was in the front this year, I switch them front/back every year. In my opinion it can do one last year (next summer) in the back. How would you fix the leak? I read those slime sprays damages the tire internally over time, but them its really approaching end of life fast in my opinion... I did visual inspection, I really dont see anything except maybe 1or two very tiny mark that could have been a nail puncture or something but its nothing sure... Maybe soap+ water? Thanks for hints. Ps: I have the tool somewhere for the indicator measurement, I cant find it right now.”
r/tires
·1 upvote ·2024-11-10
“17" Goodyear efficient grip performance 2 small leak identified Hi, On my VW Touran 2019, 1.5 TSI, 17" alu oem wheels I have set Goodyear efficient grip performance 2 . There is a small leak lets say the pressure goes fro m 2.5psi to 2 psi in approx 7-10 days. The VW tpms warns me usually every 2-3 weeks. Im posting a new topic as I cant seem to upload pictures on the other one... Thanks to some help here I found the leak. See the pictures. I have no idea what is that roundish shape it seems smooth/rubbery and the hole clearly come from inside it. What now? Slime bottle? Glue? Or this thing that goes inside like a tire repair kit with the kind of rope thingy? Thanks!”
r/TyreReviews
·3 upvotes ·2026-06-16
“Hankook ventus prime 4 VS Goodyear efficientgrip performance 2 I cannot decide between these two tires for ages now. Customer reviews seem all over the place. I drive a tuned volkswagen polo mk6 2020. I need something that inspires confidence for spirited driving in corners with good stability, mainly dry handling and braking but also relatively comfortable. So far I've learned that the goodyear is more comfortable, better in the wet, better at braking but extremely lousy in handling because of the soft sidewalls. Can someone that has used the EGP2 confirm those claims or are they exaggerating. Base spec polos are known for a harsh ride and I live in the balkans. The roads are full of potholes and sometimes you can't even drive around them. specs: 195/55R16 87V”
Top themes
#Wet performance and braking#High durability and longevity#Soft sidewalls and cornering handling#Comfort and low rolling resistance#Comparison with Michelin Primacy
Based on 9 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun | B · Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 86 | 35 |
| Rim diameters | 14″ – 19″ | 15″ – 21″ |
| Tread depth | — | 8/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 300 A - AA A |
| Sidewall | — | Black Side Wall - Raised Black Lettering |
| Max pressure | — | 50 psi |
| Sizes in common | 24 | 24 |
Which one should you actually buy?
72
/ 100
Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
85
/ 100
Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2
Winner: Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 — better efficiency, treadwear and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire B
You want lower fuel or energy use
Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 scores 90 vs 32 on efficiency.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 scores 94 vs 69 on treadwear.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 scores 81 vs 62 on comfort.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 scores 81 vs 66 on handling.
Pick tire A
Your priority is straight aquaplaning
Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun won 9 of 10 shared straight aquaplaning tests.
Tire A · Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
Tire B · Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun or EfficientGrip Performance 2?
Which is better in the wet, ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun or EfficientGrip Performance 2?
Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2, 83 vs 79 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun or EfficientGrip Performance 2?
Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2, 82 vs 74 on our dry score.
Which is quieter, ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun or EfficientGrip Performance 2?
Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2, 75 vs 66 on our noise score.
Which is more comfortable, ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun or EfficientGrip Performance 2?
Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2, 81 vs 62 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun or EfficientGrip Performance 2?
Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2, 94 vs 69 on our treadwear score.
Which rolls more easily, ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun or EfficientGrip Performance 2?
Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2, 90 vs 32 on our efficiency score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology