tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun vs Nexen N Blue HD+ — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 21 + 5 road tests and 1,241 + 82 owner reviews. How we score

ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun leads, 72–70 Narrow edge

Check price on Amazon · ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun or N Blue HD+ on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
Tire AFalken

ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun

Summer

± 5

Tests 77 · 21 tests Owners 66 · 1,241 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 21 in 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test (straight aquaplaning)

“Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun, very grippy especially in the wet”

Nexen N Blue HD+
Tire BNexen

N Blue HD+

Summer

± 8

Tests 70 · 5 tests Owners 71 · 82 reviews

Best test result: #2 of 10 in 2017 Mid Range Tyre Test (dry braking)

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

Key facts

  • In 3 tests that measured dry braking for both, ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun won 1 and N Blue HD+ won 0 (average 96% vs 95% of the best).
  • In 3 tests that measured wet braking for both, ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun won 3 and N Blue HD+ won 0 (average 95% vs 92% of the best).
  1. 74

    Dry

    ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun +2
    72
    Why this score
    SourceZIEX ZE310 EcoRunN Blue HD+
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 20 / 5 tests7974
    Reviews found online6770
    Dry Braking (% of best) · 3 shared tests · wins 1–096%95%
    Dry Handling (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 1–099%99%
    Dry Handling (tester's mark) (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–078%78%

    ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun: 60% × 79.4 + 40% × 66.7 = 74

    N Blue HD+: 60% × 73.6 + 40% × 70.4 = 72

  2. 79

    Wet

    ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun +6
    73
    Why this score
    SourceZIEX ZE310 EcoRunN Blue HD+
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 20 / 5 tests8573
    Reviews found online7074
    Straight Aquaplaning (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 2–097%93%
    Wet Handling (tester's mark) (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–070%60%
    Wet Braking (% of best) · 3 shared tests · wins 3–095%92%
    Wet Handling (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 2–097%96%

    ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun: 60% × 85.5 + 40% × 69.6 = 79

    N Blue HD+: 60% × 73.1 + 40% × 73.9 = 73

  3. 62

    Comfort

    N Blue HD+ +9
    71
    Why this score
    SourceZIEX ZE310 EcoRunN Blue HD+
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / 1 tests6070
    Reviews found online6372
    Comfort (tester's mark) (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–170%80%

    ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun: 40% × 60.5 + 60% × 62.7 = 62

    N Blue HD+: 40% × 70 + 60% × 71.8 = 71

  4. 66

    Noise

    N Blue HD+ +1
    67
    Why this score
    SourceZIEX ZE310 EcoRunN Blue HD+
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 14 / 2 tests6667
    Reviews found online≈ 67 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Noise (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 1–098%97%

    ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun: 60% × 66 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 66

    N Blue HD+: 60% × 66.6 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 67

    No owner ratings of noise for ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun or N Blue HD+. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  5. 69

    Treadwear

    ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun +3
    66
    Why this score
    SourceZIEX ZE310 EcoRunN Blue HD+
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 6 / 1 tests7364
    Reviews found online6367
    Wear (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–073%63%

    ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun: 60% × 72.7 + 40% × 63 = 69

    N Blue HD+: 60% × 64.5 + 40% × 67.3 = 66

  6. 66

    Handling (owners)

    N Blue HD+ +5
    71
    Why this score
    SourceZIEX ZE310 EcoRunN Blue HD+
    Reviews found online6671
  7. 32

    Efficiency

    N Blue HD+ +23
    55
    Why this score
    SourceZIEX ZE310 EcoRunN Blue HD+
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 15 / 3 tests3255
    Rolling Resistance (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 1–180%82%
Scores at a glance
CategoryFalken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRunNexen N Blue HD+
Relative Score 72 70
Dry 74 72
Wet 79 73
Comfort 62 71
Noise 66 67
Treadwear 69 66
Handling (owners) 66 71
Efficiency 32 55

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 5

ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun

± 8

N Blue HD+

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

In the overall rankings of 4 tests that ran both, Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun finished ahead 4 times and Nexen N Blue HD+ 0 times.

DisciplineCategoryZIEX ZE310 EcoRunN Blue HD+ΔHead-to-head
Dry Braking Dry 96% 95% +0.3 1–0 in 3 shared tests Newest: 2021 53 Summer Tyre Braking Test · 205/55 R16
Dry Handling Dry 99% 99% +0.2 1–0 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2021 Auto Bild 16 Inch Summer Tyre Test · 205/55 R16
Dry Handling (tester's mark) Dry 78% 78% 0.0 0–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2019 AMS Summer SUV Tyre Test · 215/55 R17
Straight Aquaplaning Wet 97% 93% +4.7 2–0 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2021 Auto Bild 16 Inch Summer Tyre Test · 205/55 R16
Wet Braking Wet 95% 92% +2.4 3–0 in 3 shared tests Newest: 2021 53 Summer Tyre Braking Test · 205/55 R16
Wet Handling Wet 97% 96% +1.2 2–0 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2021 Auto Bild 16 Inch Summer Tyre Test · 205/55 R16
Wet Handling (tester's mark) Wet 70% 60% +10.0 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2019 AMS Summer SUV Tyre Test · 215/55 R17
Comfort (tester's mark) Comfort 70% 80% −10.0 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2019 AMS Summer SUV Tyre Test · 215/55 R17
Noise Noise 98% 97% +1.0 1–0 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2021 Auto Bild 16 Inch Summer Tyre Test · 205/55 R16
Wear Treadwear 73% 63% +9.9 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2021 Auto Bild 16 Inch Summer Tyre Test · 205/55 R16
Rolling Resistance Efficiency 80% 82% −2.2 1–1 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2021 Auto Bild 16 Inch Summer Tyre Test · 205/55 R16
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Total Cost of Ownership Cost #11/20 #16/20 – 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2021 Auto Bild 16 Inch Summer Tyre Test · 205/55 R16
Value Cost 80% 76% +4.9 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2021 Auto Bild 16 Inch Summer Tyre Test · 205/55 R16
Overall Ranking Overall #8/53 #15/53 – 4–0 in 4 shared tests Newest: 2021 53 Summer Tyre Braking Test · 205/55 R16

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun

Pros

  • Exceptionally low road noise and high cabin comfort
  • Strong grip and stability in both wet and dry weather conditions
  • Outstanding value for money compared to premium brands

Cons

  • Some drivers report higher rolling resistance and slightly increased fuel consumption
  • Soft sidewalls can lead to vague initial steering response or a less sporty feel during hard cornering
  • Occasional complaints of a firmer, harsher ride over bumps depending on vehicle suspension and aspect ratio
All owner themes in the ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun review

Tire B N Blue HD+

Pros

  • Excellent value for money compared to premium brands
  • High level of ride comfort and very low road noise
  • Reliable and stable grip in both dry and wet conditions for normal driving

Cons

  • Accelerated tread wear reported by some users
  • Vague handling and loss of predictability when pushed hard or cornered aggressively
  • Occasional reports of shoulder cracking or ruptures
All owner themes in the N Blue HD+ review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun

Positive

Community sentiment regarding the Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun is generally positive, with specific praise noted for its strong wet grip. Users frequently evaluate it as an affordable alternative alongside other budget-friendly options for smaller or standard passenger vehicles.

Top themes
#wet weather performance#budget friendly options#tire size availability#grip and handling#eco-run efficiency

Based on 5 community posts

Tire B

Nexen N Blue HD+

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun B · Nexen N Blue HD+
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available86—
Rim diameters14″ – 19″—

Which one should you actually buy?

Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun

Nexen N Blue HD+

Narrow edge: Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun — better wet and treadwear. Pick the Nexen N Blue HD+ if efficiency and comfort matter most to you.

Pick tire B You want lower fuel or energy use

Nexen N Blue HD+ scores 55 vs 32 on efficiency.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Nexen N Blue HD+ scores 71 vs 62 on comfort.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun scores 79 vs 73 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun scores 69 vs 66 on treadwear.

Tire A · Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Nexen N Blue HD+
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun or N Blue HD+?

Which is better in the wet, ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun or N Blue HD+?

Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun, 79 vs 73 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun or N Blue HD+?

Neither, by our numbers: 74 vs 72 on the dry score, within 3 points.

Which is quieter, ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun or N Blue HD+?

Neither, by our numbers: 66 vs 67 on the noise score, within 3 points.

Which is more comfortable, ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun or N Blue HD+?

Nexen N Blue HD+, 71 vs 62 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun or N Blue HD+?

Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun, 69 vs 66 on our treadwear score.

Which rolls more easily, ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun or N Blue HD+?

Nexen N Blue HD+, 55 vs 32 on our efficiency score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology