tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 vs Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 23 + 21 road tests and 5,925 + 1,241 owner reviews. How we score

EfficientGrip Performance 2 is ahead, 85–72

Check price on Amazon · EfficientGrip Performance 2 or ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2
Tire AGoodyear

EfficientGrip Performance 2

Summer

± 4

Tests 87 · 23 tests Owners 83 · 5,925 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 21 in 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test (wear)

“Advice on new tyres So my car got stolen (RIP) and I bought a 16' MB c200d with rears 245/40r18 Its time to change them and I don't know what to do. A/S are not needed because snow is very rare in central Spain. Winter temperatures range between 0-10°C and summer range from 30 to 40. As I drive 25-30000 km per year I especially value wet performance and durability (Minimum 35-40000 km). The problem is, the tyres that would fit perfectlly to me are not available in this size (GY efficient grip performance 2 -best tyres i've ever had- and Michelin Primacy 5). What i've seen is Firestone (both roadhawk 2 and roadhawk sport), continental PC7, GY assy 6, Michelin PS5, bridgestone T6, Dunlop sport TG, kormoran/tigar/Taurus summer 2, nexen sport, hancook (Ventus evo 137 and Ventus prime 4) and kumho ps72. Even though It would be nice to save some money, i'm worried about losing rear grip when wet (its my first rwd) so its not important. What would you pick? Read more”

Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
Tire BFalken

ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun

Summer

± 5

Tests 77 · 21 tests Owners 66 · 1,241 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 21 in 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test (straight aquaplaning)

“Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun, very grippy especially in the wet”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

Key facts

  • In 13 tests that measured dry braking for both, EfficientGrip Performance 2 won 5 and ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun won 8 (average 96% vs 96% of the best).
  • In 13 tests that measured wet braking for both, EfficientGrip Performance 2 won 4 and ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun won 9 (average 92% vs 93% of the best).
  • In 10 tests that measured straight aquaplaning for both, EfficientGrip Performance 2 won 1 and ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun won 9 (average 95% vs 98% of the best).
  • In 9 tests that measured noise for both, EfficientGrip Performance 2 won 5 and ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun won 4 (average 99% vs 98% of the best).
  • In 8 tests that measured wet handling for both, EfficientGrip Performance 2 won 7 and ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun won 1 (average 98% vs 97% of the best).
  1. 82

    Dry

    EfficientGrip Performance 2 +8
    74
    Why this score
    SourceEfficientGrip Performance 2ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 21 / 20 tests8179
    Reviews found online8367
    Dry Braking (% of best) · 13 shared tests · wins 5–896%96%
    Dry Handling (% of best) · 7 shared tests · wins 3–399%99%
    Dry Handling (tester's mark) (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–192%94%
    Dry (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–097%92%

    EfficientGrip Performance 2: 60% × 80.7 + 40% × 83 = 82

    ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun: 60% × 79.4 + 40% × 66.7 = 74

  2. 83

    Wet

    EfficientGrip Performance 2 +4
    79
    Why this score
    SourceEfficientGrip Performance 2ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 21 / 20 tests8385
    Reviews found online8470
    Curved Aquaplaning (% of best) · 5 shared tests · wins 2–392%93%
    Straight Aquaplaning (% of best) · 10 shared tests · wins 1–995%98%
    Wet (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–196%97%
    Wet Braking (% of best) · 13 shared tests · wins 4–992%93%
    Wet Braking (concrete) (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 0–291%93%
    Wet Circle (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–099%98%
    Wet Handling (% of best) · 8 shared tests · wins 7–198%97%

    EfficientGrip Performance 2: 60% × 82.7 + 40% × 84.3 = 83

    ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun: 60% × 85.5 + 40% × 69.6 = 79

  3. 81

    Comfort

    EfficientGrip Performance 2 +19
    62
    Why this score
    SourceEfficientGrip Performance 2ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 4 / 2 tests8460
    Reviews found online7963
    Comfort (tester's mark) (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–0100%93%

    EfficientGrip Performance 2: 40% × 84.3 + 60% × 78.5 = 81

    ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun: 40% × 60.5 + 60% × 62.7 = 62

  4. 75

    Noise

    EfficientGrip Performance 2 +9
    66
    Why this score
    SourceEfficientGrip Performance 2ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 13 / 14 tests8166
    Reviews found online≈ 67 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Noise (% of best) · 9 shared tests · wins 5–499%98%

    EfficientGrip Performance 2: 60% × 80.7 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 75

    ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun: 60% × 66 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 66

    No owner ratings of noise for EfficientGrip Performance 2 or ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  5. 94

    Treadwear

    EfficientGrip Performance 2 +25
    69
    Why this score
    SourceEfficientGrip Performance 2ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 7 / 6 tests10073
    Reviews found online8563
    Abrasion (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 2–075%56%
    Wear (% of best) · 5 shared tests · wins 5–098%65%

    EfficientGrip Performance 2: 60% × 100 + 40% × 84.8 = 94

    ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun: 60% × 72.7 + 40% × 63 = 69

  6. 81

    Handling (owners)

    EfficientGrip Performance 2 +15
    66
    Why this score
    SourceEfficientGrip Performance 2ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
    Reviews found online8166
  7. 90

    Efficiency

    EfficientGrip Performance 2 +58
    32
    Why this score
    SourceEfficientGrip Performance 2ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 17 / 15 tests9032
    Fuel Consumption (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 2–097%94%
    Rolling Resistance (% of best) · 8 shared tests · wins 7–192%78%
Scores at a glance
CategoryGoodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
Relative Score 85 72
Dry 82 74
Wet 83 79
Comfort 81 62
Noise 75 66
Treadwear 94 69
Handling (owners) 81 66
Efficiency 90 32

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 4

EfficientGrip Performance 2

± 5

ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

In the overall rankings of 17 tests that ran both, Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 finished ahead 14 times and Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun 3 times.

DisciplineCategoryEfficientGrip Performance 2ZIEX ZE310 EcoRunΔHead-to-head
Dry Dry 97% 92% +5.1 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2022 Al Volante Summer Tire Test R16 · 205/60R16
Dry Braking Dry 96% 96% 0.0 5–8 in 13 shared tests Newest: 2025 Motor Low Rolling Resistance (AA) Tyre Test · 205/55 R16
Dry Handling Dry 99% 99% −0.2 3–3 in 7 shared tests Newest: 2025 Motor Low Rolling Resistance (AA) Tyre Test · 205/55 R16
Dry Handling (tester's mark) Dry 92% 94% −2.9 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2025 Motor Low Rolling Resistance (AA) Tyre Test · 205/55 R16
Curved Aquaplaning Wet 92% 93% −0.9 2–3 in 5 shared tests Newest: 2025 Motor Low Rolling Resistance (AA) Tyre Test · 205/55 R16
Straight Aquaplaning Wet 95% 98% −2.5 1–9 in 10 shared tests Newest: 2025 Motor Low Rolling Resistance (AA) Tyre Test · 205/55 R16
Wet Wet 96% 97% −1.0 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2022 Al Volante Summer Tire Test R16 · 205/60R16
Wet Braking Wet 92% 93% −0.9 4–9 in 13 shared tests Newest: 2025 Motor Low Rolling Resistance (AA) Tyre Test · 205/55 R16
Wet Braking (concrete) Wet 91% 93% −2.5 0–2 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2024 ADAC Summer Tyre Test · 215/55 R17
Wet Circle Wet 99% 98% +0.4 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test · 215/55 R17
Wet Handling Wet 98% 97% +1.0 7–1 in 8 shared tests Newest: 2025 Motor Low Rolling Resistance (AA) Tyre Test · 205/55 R16
Comfort (tester's mark) Comfort 100% 93% +7.1 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2025 Motor Low Rolling Resistance (AA) Tyre Test · 205/55 R16
Noise Noise 99% 98% +0.9 5–4 in 9 shared tests Newest: 2025 Motor Low Rolling Resistance (AA) Tyre Test · 205/55 R16
Abrasion Treadwear 75% 56% +18.3 2–0 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2024 ADAC Summer Tyre Test · 215/55 R17
Wear Treadwear 98% 65% +33.6 5–0 in 5 shared tests Newest: 2024 ADAC Summer Tyre Test · 215/55 R17
Fuel Consumption Efficiency 97% 94% +3.3 2–0 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2024 ADAC Summer Tyre Test · 215/55 R17
Rolling Resistance Efficiency 92% 78% +13.5 7–1 in 8 shared tests Newest: 2025 Motor Low Rolling Resistance (AA) Tyre Test · 205/55 R16
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Price Cost 67% 83% −15.1 0–3 in 3 shared tests Newest: 2024 ADAC Summer Tyre Test · 215/55 R17
Total Cost of Ownership Cost #1/20 #13/20 – 3–0 in 3 shared tests Newest: 2024 AutoBild Summer Tyre Test · 205/55 R16
Value Cost 85% 68% +16.8 5–0 in 5 shared tests Newest: 2024 ADAC Summer Tyre Test · 215/55 R17
Overall Ranking Overall #2/6 #3/6 – 14–3 in 17 shared tests Newest: 2025 Wybór Kierowców Summer Tire Test R16 · 205/55R16

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A EfficientGrip Performance 2

Pros

  • Exceptional tread longevity and mileage capability
  • Quiet operation and high cabin comfort
  • Strong grip and predictable handling in both wet and dry conditions

Cons

  • Soft sidewalls can cause steering vagueness or body roll during aggressive cornering
  • Some users report increased tire noise or resonance as the tread wears down
  • Occasional complaints regarding weaker wet braking or traction compared to dedicated sports tires
All owner themes in the EfficientGrip Performance 2 review

Tire B ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun

Pros

  • Exceptionally low road noise and high cabin comfort
  • Strong grip and stability in both wet and dry weather conditions
  • Outstanding value for money compared to premium brands

Cons

  • Some drivers report higher rolling resistance and slightly increased fuel consumption
  • Soft sidewalls can lead to vague initial steering response or a less sporty feel during hard cornering
  • Occasional complaints of a firmer, harsher ride over bumps depending on vehicle suspension and aspect ratio
All owner themes in the ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2

Positive

Community opinion on the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 is largely positive, with users frequently praising its exceptional wet performance, high durability, and overall comfort. Some users note that its soft sidewalls can make it feel less sharp during spirited cornering, but it remains a top choice for efficiency, braking, and longevity.

r/tires ·1 upvote ·2024-11-10

“17" Goodyear efficient grip performance 2 small leak Hi, On my VW Touran 2019, 1.5 TSI, 17" alu oem wheels I have set Goodyear efficient grip performance 2 . There is a small leak lets say the pressure goes fro m 2.5psi to 2 psi in approx 7-10 days. The VW tpms warns me usually every 2-3 weeks. Those are summer tires, I just removed them for swapping with winter ones and I haven't cleaned them yet. They are quite dirty at the moment. The leaking one, pictured, was in the front this year, I switch them front/back every year. In my opinion it can do one last year (next summer) in the back. How would you fix the leak? I read those slime sprays damages the tire internally over time, but them its really approaching end of life fast in my opinion... I did visual inspection, I really dont see anything except maybe 1or two very tiny mark that could have been a nail puncture or something but its nothing sure... Maybe soap+ water? Thanks for hints. Ps: I have the tool somewhere for the indicator measurement, I cant find it right now.”
r/tires ·1 upvote ·2024-11-10

“17" Goodyear efficient grip performance 2 small leak identified Hi, On my VW Touran 2019, 1.5 TSI, 17" alu oem wheels I have set Goodyear efficient grip performance 2 . There is a small leak lets say the pressure goes fro m 2.5psi to 2 psi in approx 7-10 days. The VW tpms warns me usually every 2-3 weeks. Im posting a new topic as I cant seem to upload pictures on the other one... Thanks to some help here I found the leak. See the pictures. I have no idea what is that roundish shape it seems smooth/rubbery and the hole clearly come from inside it. What now? Slime bottle? Glue? Or this thing that goes inside like a tire repair kit with the kind of rope thingy? Thanks!”
r/TyreReviews ·3 upvotes ·2026-06-16

“Hankook ventus prime 4 VS Goodyear efficientgrip performance 2 I cannot decide between these two tires for ages now. Customer reviews seem all over the place. I drive a tuned volkswagen polo mk6 2020. I need something that inspires confidence for spirited driving in corners with good stability, mainly dry handling and braking but also relatively comfortable. So far I've learned that the goodyear is more comfortable, better in the wet, better at braking but extremely lousy in handling because of the soft sidewalls. Can someone that has used the EGP2 confirm those claims or are they exaggerating. Base spec polos are known for a harsh ride and I live in the balkans. The roads are full of potholes and sometimes you can't even drive around them. specs: 195/55R16 87V”
Top themes
#Wet performance and braking#High durability and longevity#Soft sidewalls and cornering handling#Comfort and low rolling resistance#Comparison with Michelin Primacy

Based on 9 community posts

Tire B

Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun

Positive

Community sentiment regarding the Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun is generally positive, with specific praise noted for its strong wet grip. Users frequently evaluate it as an affordable alternative alongside other budget-friendly options for smaller or standard passenger vehicles.

Top themes
#wet weather performance#budget friendly options#tire size availability#grip and handling#eco-run efficiency

Based on 5 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 B · Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available3586
Rim diameters15″ – 21″14″ – 19″
Tread depth8/32″—
UTQG300 A - AA A—
SidewallBlack Side Wall - Raised Black Lettering—
Max pressure50 psi—
Sizes in common2424

Which one should you actually buy?

Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2

Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun

Winner: Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 — better efficiency, treadwear and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire A You want lower fuel or energy use

Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 scores 90 vs 32 on efficiency.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 scores 94 vs 69 on treadwear.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 scores 81 vs 62 on comfort.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 scores 81 vs 66 on handling.

Pick tire B Your priority is straight aquaplaning

Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun won 9 of 10 shared straight aquaplaning tests.

Tire A · Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

EfficientGrip Performance 2 or ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun?

Which is better in the wet, EfficientGrip Performance 2 or ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun?

Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2, 83 vs 79 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, EfficientGrip Performance 2 or ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun?

Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2, 82 vs 74 on our dry score.

Which is quieter, EfficientGrip Performance 2 or ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun?

Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2, 75 vs 66 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, EfficientGrip Performance 2 or ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun?

Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2, 81 vs 62 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, EfficientGrip Performance 2 or ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun?

Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2, 94 vs 69 on our treadwear score.

Which rolls more easily, EfficientGrip Performance 2 or ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun?

Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2, 90 vs 32 on our efficiency score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology