Nexen N FERA SUR4 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun vs Nexen N FERA SUR4 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 21 + 0 road tests and 1,241 + 6 owner reviews. How we score

ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun is ahead, 73–62

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
Tire AFalken

ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun

Summer

Tests 76 · 21 tests Owners 68 · 1,241 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 21 in 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test (straight aquaplaning)

“Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun, very grippy especially in the wet”

Nexen N FERA SUR4
Tire BNexen

N FERA SUR4

Summer

Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 57 · 6 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 75

    Dry

    ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun +4
    71
    Why this score
    SourceZIEX ZE310 EcoRunN FERA SUR4
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 20 / – tests79≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online6973

    ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun: 60% × 79.1 + 40% × 68.5 = 75

    N FERA SUR4: 60% × 69.9 (est.) + 40% × 73.2 = 71

    No road tests of dry for N FERA SUR4. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 79

    Wet

    ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun +24
    55
    Why this score
    SourceZIEX ZE310 EcoRunN FERA SUR4
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 20 / – tests84≈ 59 (est.)
    Reviews found online7150

    ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun: 60% × 84.4 + 40% × 70.9 = 79

    N FERA SUR4: 60% × 58.8 (est.) + 40% × 50.1 = 55

    No road tests of wet for N FERA SUR4. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 62

    Comfort

    ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun +2
    60
    Why this score
    SourceZIEX ZE310 EcoRunN FERA SUR4
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / – tests60≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online6551

    ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun: 60% × 60.5 + 40% × 65 = 62

    N FERA SUR4: 60% × 65.9 (est.) + 40% × 50.6 = 60

    No road tests of comfort for N FERA SUR4. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  4. 67

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceZIEX ZE310 EcoRunN FERA SUR4
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 14 / – tests66–
    Reviews found online≈ 67 (est.)–

    ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun: 60% × 66 + 40% × 67.3 (est.) = 67

    No owner ratings of noise for ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  5. 69

    Treadwear

    ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun +14
    55
    Why this score
    SourceZIEX ZE310 EcoRunN FERA SUR4
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 6 / – tests72≈ 60 (est.)
    Reviews found online6547

    ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun: 60% × 72.1 + 40% × 64.9 = 69

    N FERA SUR4: 60% × 59.8 (est.) + 40% × 46.7 = 55

    No road tests of treadwear for N FERA SUR4. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  6. 67

    Handling (owners)

    N FERA SUR4 +4
    71
    Why this score
    SourceZIEX ZE310 EcoRunN FERA SUR4
    Reviews found online6771
Scores at a glance
Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun vs Nexen N FERA SUR4: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryFalken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRunNexen N FERA SUR4
Relative Score 73 62
Dry 75 71
Wet 79 55
Comfort 62 60
Noise 67 –
Treadwear 69 55
Handling (owners) 67 71

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun

N FERA SUR4

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun

Pros

  • Exceptionally low road noise and high cabin comfort
  • Strong grip and stability in both wet and dry weather conditions
  • Outstanding value for money compared to premium brands

Cons

  • Some drivers report higher rolling resistance and slightly increased fuel consumption
  • Soft sidewalls can lead to vague initial steering response or a less sporty feel during hard cornering
  • Occasional complaints of a firmer, harsher ride over bumps depending on vehicle suspension and aspect ratio
All owner themes in the ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun review

Tire B N FERA SUR4

Pros

  • Exceptional dry grip and track-day performance
  • Precise steering feedback and predictable handling
  • Cost-effective alternative to more expensive track tires

Cons

  • High level of road noise
  • Poor wet-weather performance and dangerous hydroplaning tendencies in heavy rain
  • Fast tread wear
All owner themes in the N FERA SUR4 review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun

Positive

Community sentiment regarding the Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun is generally positive, with specific praise noted for its strong wet grip. Users frequently evaluate it as an affordable alternative alongside other budget-friendly options for smaller or standard passenger vehicles.

Top themes
#wet weather performance#budget friendly options#tire size availability#grip and handling#eco-run efficiency

Based on 5 community posts

Tire B

Nexen N FERA SUR4

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun B · Nexen N FERA SUR4
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available86—
Rim diameters14″ – 19″—

Which one should you actually buy?

Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun

Nexen N FERA SUR4

Winner: Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun — better wet, treadwear and dry. Where the Nexen N FERA SUR4 is ahead, it is by less than 3 points. Nexen N FERA SUR4 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 6 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun scores 79 vs 55 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun scores 69 vs 55 on treadwear.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun scores 75 vs 71 on dry.

Tire A · Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
Tire B · Nexen N FERA SUR4

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun or N FERA SUR4?

Which is better in the wet, ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun or N FERA SUR4?

Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun, 79 vs 55 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun or N FERA SUR4?

Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun, 75 vs 71 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun or N FERA SUR4?

Neither, by our numbers: 62 vs 60 on the comfort score, within 3 points.

Which lasts longer, ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun or N FERA SUR4?

Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun, 69 vs 55 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology