Tests 76 · 21 tests Owners 68 · 1,240 reviews
Best test result: #5 of 7 in 2025 Motor Low Rolling Resistance (AA) Tyre Test (overall ranking)
“Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun, very grippy especially in the wet”
Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.
ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun is ahead, 72–65
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 76 · 21 tests Owners 68 · 1,240 reviews
Best test result: #5 of 7 in 2025 Motor Low Rolling Resistance (AA) Tyre Test (overall ranking)
“Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun, very grippy especially in the wet”
Tests – · 1 test Owners 59 · 76 reviews
Best test result: #18 of 22 in 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance Summer Tires (overall ranking)
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
| Source | ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun | S.drive |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 79 | – |
| Reviews found online | 69 | 65 |
| Source | ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun | S.drive |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 84 | – |
| Reviews found online | 71 | 60 |
| Source | ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun | S.drive |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews found online | – | 38 |
| Source | ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun | S.drive |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 60 | – |
| Reviews found online | 65 | 57 |
| Source | ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun | S.drive |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 66 | – |
| Reviews found online | – | 61 |
| Source | ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun | S.drive |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 72 | 70 |
| Reviews found online | 65 | 60 |
| Source | ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun | S.drive |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews found online | 67 | 64 |
| Category | Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun | Yokohama S.drive |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 72 | 65 |
| Dry | 75 | 66 |
| Wet | 79 | 63 |
| Snow | – | 50 |
| Comfort | 62 | 63 |
| Noise | 66 | 64 |
| Treadwear | 69 | 66 |
| Handling | 67 | 64 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neither tire has a score here yet, so this weight changes nothing.
ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
S.drive
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Each result is shown as % of the best tire in that test. “Same test” rows are the strictest comparison: both tires were measured side by side.
| Discipline | Category | ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun | S.drive | Δ | Both? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Ranking | Overall | 20% #5/7 · 2025 Motor Low Rolling Resistance (AA) Tyre Test | 19% #18/22 · 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance Summer Tires | +0.9 | Different tests |
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Community sentiment regarding the Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun is generally positive, with specific praise noted for its strong wet grip. Users frequently evaluate it as an affordable alternative alongside other budget-friendly options for smaller or standard passenger vehicles.
Based on 5 community posts
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
| Attribute | A · Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun | B · Yokohama S.drive |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Ultra High Performance Summer tire |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 86 | 1 |
| Rim diameters | 14″ – 19″ | 17″ |
| Tread depth | — | 10/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 300 A A |
| Sidewall | — | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | — | 51 psi |
Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
Yokohama S.drive
Winner: Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun — better wet, dry and treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun scores 79 vs 63 on wet.
Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun scores 75 vs 66 on dry.
Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun scores 69 vs 66 on treadwear.
Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun scores 67 vs 64 on handling.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.