General AltiMAX RT looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Falken Ziez ZE950 AS vs General AltiMAX RT — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 3 + 11 owner reviews. How we score

Ziez ZE950 AS is ahead, 75–65

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Falken Ziez ZE950 AS
Tire AFalken

Ziez ZE950 AS

All Season High Performance tires

Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 77 · 3 reviews

General AltiMAX RT
Tire BGeneral

AltiMAX RT

All-Season Touring tires

Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 63 · 11 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 76

    Dry

    Ziez ZE950 AS +11
    65
    Why this score
    SourceZiez ZE950 ASAltiMAX RT
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 73 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online8164

    Ziez ZE950 AS: 60% × 72.9 (est.) + 40% × 80.6 = 76

    AltiMAX RT: 60% × 66.1 (est.) + 40% × 63.7 = 65

    No road tests of dry for Ziez ZE950 AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

    No road tests of dry for AltiMAX RT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 76

    Wet

    Ziez ZE950 AS +9
    67
    Why this score
    SourceZiez ZE950 ASAltiMAX RT
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 74 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online7866

    Ziez ZE950 AS: 60% × 74.2 (est.) + 40% × 77.6 = 76

    AltiMAX RT: 60% × 67.7 (est.) + 40% × 66 = 67

    No road tests of wet for Ziez ZE950 AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

    No road tests of wet for AltiMAX RT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 77

    Snow

    Ziez ZE950 AS +16
    61
    Why this score
    SourceZiez ZE950 ASAltiMAX RT
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 74 (est.)≈ 65 (est.)
    Reviews found online8155

    Ziez ZE950 AS: 60% × 73.7 (est.) + 40% × 81.3 = 77

    AltiMAX RT: 60% × 65 (est.) + 40% × 55 = 61

    No road tests of snow for Ziez ZE950 AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

    No road tests of snow for AltiMAX RT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

  4. 75

    Comfort

    Ziez ZE950 AS +10
    65
    Why this score
    SourceZiez ZE950 ASAltiMAX RT
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 71 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online8262

    Ziez ZE950 AS: 60% × 71.3 (est.) + 40% × 81.5 = 75

    AltiMAX RT: 60% × 67.8 (est.) + 40% × 61.5 = 65

    No road tests of comfort for Ziez ZE950 AS or AltiMAX RT. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. –

    Noise

    No comparison
    66
    Why this score
    SourceZiez ZE950 ASAltiMAX RT
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online–65

    AltiMAX RT: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 64.8 = 66

    No road tests of noise for AltiMAX RT. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 67

    Treadwear

    Ziez ZE950 AS +2
    65
    Why this score
    SourceZiez ZE950 ASAltiMAX RT
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 65 (est.)
    Reviews found online6864

    Ziez ZE950 AS: 60% × 66.5 (est.) + 40% × 68.4 = 67

    AltiMAX RT: 60% × 65.1 (est.) + 40% × 63.8 = 65

    No road tests of treadwear for Ziez ZE950 AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

    No road tests of treadwear for AltiMAX RT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  7. 80

    Handling (owners)

    Ziez ZE950 AS +16
    64
    Why this score
    SourceZiez ZE950 ASAltiMAX RT
    Reviews found online8064
Scores at a glance
Falken Ziez ZE950 AS vs General AltiMAX RT: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryFalken Ziez ZE950 ASGeneral AltiMAX RT
Relative Score 75 65
Dry 76 65
Wet 76 67
Snow 77 61
Comfort 75 65
Noise – 66
Treadwear 67 65
Handling (owners) 80 64

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Ziez ZE950 AS

AltiMAX RT

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Ziez ZE950 AS

Pros

  • Excellent value for the price point
  • Smooth and comfortable ride quality
  • Low road noise levels

Cons

  • Limited tread life warranty compared to some competitors
  • Potential trade-off between handling performance and longevity
All owner themes in the Ziez ZE950 AS review

Tire B AltiMAX RT

Pros

  • Affordable price point offering high value
  • Quiet and comfortable ride quality suitable for large sedans
  • Reliable all-around traction in both wet and dry conditions

Cons

  • Subpar wet-weather performance reported by some users
  • Premature tread wear down to 30,000 miles in isolated experiences
All owner themes in the AltiMAX RT review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Falken Ziez ZE950 AS B · General AltiMAX RT
CategoryAll Season High Performance tiresAll-Season Touring tires
Vehicle type—Passenger Car / Crossover
Tread depth—10/32″
UTQG—440 A A
Treadwear warranty—70,000 mi
Sidewall—Blackwall
Max pressure—44 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

Falken Ziez ZE950 AS

General AltiMAX RT

Winner: Falken Ziez ZE950 AS — better snow, handling and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score. Falken Ziez ZE950 AS rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 3 reviews), so read this result as provisional. General AltiMAX RT rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 11 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A You drive through snowy winters

Falken Ziez ZE950 AS scores 77 vs 61 on snow.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Falken Ziez ZE950 AS scores 80 vs 64 on handling.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Falken Ziez ZE950 AS scores 76 vs 65 on dry.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Falken Ziez ZE950 AS scores 75 vs 65 on comfort.

Tire A · Falken Ziez ZE950 AS
Tire B · General AltiMAX RT

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Ziez ZE950 AS or AltiMAX RT?

Which is better in the wet, Ziez ZE950 AS or AltiMAX RT?

Falken Ziez ZE950 AS, 76 vs 67 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Ziez ZE950 AS or AltiMAX RT?

Falken Ziez ZE950 AS, 76 vs 65 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, Ziez ZE950 AS or AltiMAX RT?

Falken Ziez ZE950 AS, 77 vs 61 on our snow score.

Which is more comfortable, Ziez ZE950 AS or AltiMAX RT?

Falken Ziez ZE950 AS, 75 vs 65 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Ziez ZE950 AS or AltiMAX RT?

Neither, by our numbers: 67 vs 65 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology