Tests – · 1 test Owners 74 · 43 reviews
Firestone All Season vs Yokohama A539 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 1 + 0 road tests and 43 + 105 owner reviews. How we score
All Season leads, 73–69 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
74
Dry
All Season +668Why this score
Source All Season A539 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 72 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 77 68 All Season: 60% × 71.6 (est.) + 40% × 76.9 = 74
A539: 60% × 67.8 (est.) + 40% × 67.6 = 68
No road tests of dry for All Season. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
No road tests of dry for A539. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
76
Wet
All Season +571Why this score
Source All Season A539 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 75 (est.) ≈ 71 (est.) Reviews found online 78 71 All Season: 60% × 74.9 (est.) + 40% × 78.4 = 76
A539: 60% × 70.7 (est.) + 40% × 70.7 = 71
No road tests of wet for All Season. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for A539. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
69
Snow
No comparison–Why this score
Source All Season A539 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 70 (est.) – Reviews found online 68 – All Season: 60% × 69.7 (est.) + 40% × 67.8 = 69
No road tests of snow for All Season. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
71
Comfort
All Season +269Why this score
Source All Season A539 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online 71 69 All Season: 40% × 69.2 (est.) + 60% × 71.4 = 71
A539: 40% × 68.8 (est.) + 60% × 69.2 = 69
No road tests of comfort for All Season. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for A539. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
68
Noise
No comparison–Why this score
Source All Season A539 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) – Reviews found online 71 – All Season: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 70.7 = 68
No road tests of noise for All Season. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
69
Treadwear
All Season +267Why this score
Source All Season A539 Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests 67 ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 72 67 All Season: 60% × 67.1 + 40% × 72.1 = 69
A539: 60% × 66.8 (est.) + 40% × 67.2 = 67
No road tests of treadwear for A539. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
–
Handling (owners)
No comparison74Why this score
Source All Season A539 Reviews found online – 74
Scores at a glance
| Category | Firestone All Season | Yokohama A539 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 73 | 69 |
| Dry | 74 | 68 |
| Wet | 76 | 71 |
| Snow | 69 | – |
| Comfort | 71 | 69 |
| Noise | 68 | – |
| Treadwear | 69 | 67 |
| Handling (owners) | – | 74 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
All Season
A539
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A All Season
Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.
Tire B A539
Pros
- Excellent dry and wet cornering grip
- Predictable and dependable handling during spirited driving
- Good braking performance
Cons
- Can lose traction easily when cold or under heavy throttle
- Potential for wheel spin in wet conditions for quicker or more powerful cars
- Can wear relatively quickly due to a softer rubber compound
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Firestone All Season | B · Yokohama A539 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season Touring tires | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 62 | 6 |
| Rim diameters | 14″ – 20″ | 12″ – 14″ |
| Tread depth | 10/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 560 A B | — |
| Treadwear warranty | 65,000 mi | — |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | — |
| Max pressure | 44 psi | — |
| Sizes in common | 0 | 0 |
Which one should you actually buy?
Firestone All Season
Yokohama A539
Narrow edge: Firestone All Season — better dry and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Firestone All Season scores 74 vs 68 on dry.
Firestone All Season scores 76 vs 71 on wet.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
All Season or A539?
Which is better in the wet, All Season or A539?
Firestone All Season, 76 vs 71 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, All Season or A539?
Firestone All Season, 74 vs 68 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, All Season or A539?
Neither, by our numbers: 71 vs 69 on the comfort score, within 3 points.
Which lasts longer, All Season or A539?
Neither, by our numbers: 69 vs 67 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology