Tests – · 1 test Owners 64 · 42 reviews
Firestone All Season vs Yokohama A539 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.
A539 leads, 69–65 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
67
Dry
A539 +168Why this score
Source All Season A539 Reviews found online 66 68 -
68
Wet
A539 +270Why this score
Source All Season A539 Reviews found online 68 70 -
64
Snow
No comparison–Why this score
Source All Season A539 Reviews found online 61 – -
65
Comfort
A539 +469Why this score
Source All Season A539 Reviews found online 61 70 -
66
Noise
No comparison–Why this score
Source All Season A539 Reviews found online 65 – -
66
Treadwear
Level66Why this score
Source All Season A539 Professional tests (TWG score) 67 – Reviews found online 65 66 -
57
Handling
A539 +1774Why this score
Source All Season A539 Reviews found online 57 74
Scores at a glance
| Category | Firestone All Season | Yokohama A539 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 65 | 69 |
| Dry | 67 | 68 |
| Wet | 68 | 70 |
| Snow | 64 | – |
| Comfort | 65 | 69 |
| Noise | 66 | – |
| Treadwear | 66 | 66 |
| Handling | 57 | 74 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neither tire has a score here yet, so this weight changes nothing.
Neither tire has a score here yet, so this weight changes nothing.
All Season
A539
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A All Season
Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.
Tire B A539
Pros
- Excellent dry and wet cornering grip
- Predictable and dependable handling during spirited driving
- Good braking performance
Cons
- Can lose traction easily when cold or under heavy throttle
- Potential for wheel spin in wet conditions for quicker or more powerful cars
- Can wear relatively quickly due to a softer rubber compound
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Firestone All Season | B · Yokohama A539 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season Touring tires | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 62 | 6 |
| Rim diameters | 14″ – 20″ | 12″ – 14″ |
| Tread depth | 10/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 560 A B | — |
| Treadwear warranty | 65,000 mi | — |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | — |
| Max pressure | 44 psi | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
Firestone All Season
Yokohama A539
Winner: Yokohama A539 — better handling and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Yokohama A539 scores 74 vs 57 on handling.
Yokohama A539 scores 69 vs 65 on comfort.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.