Tests – · none yet Owners 71 · 5 reviews
Head-to-head
Updated
Vredestein Hi Trac 2 vs Yokohama A539 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.
Hi Trac 2 leads, 70–69 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
68
Dry
Level68Why this score
Source Hi Trac 2 A539 Reviews found online 69 68 -
74
Wet
Hi Trac 2 +470Why this score
Source Hi Trac 2 A539 Reviews found online 76 70 -
69
Comfort
Level69Why this score
Source Hi Trac 2 A539 Reviews found online 70 70 -
68
Treadwear
Hi Trac 2 +266Why this score
Source Hi Trac 2 A539 Reviews found online 69 66 -
71
Handling
A539 +374Why this score
Source Hi Trac 2 A539 Reviews found online 71 74
Scores at a glance
| Category | Vredestein Hi Trac 2 | Yokohama A539 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 70 | 69 |
| Dry | 68 | 68 |
| Wet | 74 | 70 |
| Comfort | 69 | 69 |
| Treadwear | 68 | 66 |
| Handling | 71 | 74 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
70
/ 100
Hi Trac 2
69
/ 100
A539
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Hi Trac 2
Pros
- Strong wet weather grip and braking performance
- Quiet operation compared to factory-fitted alternatives
- Good traction for acceleration and braking
Cons
- Poor tread longevity, with some users reporting significant wear under 10,000 miles
- Soft sidewalls leading to a 'wobbly' sensation or excessive flex during cornering
- Lack of lateral grip in dry conditions
Tire B A539
Pros
- Excellent dry and wet cornering grip
- Predictable and dependable handling during spirited driving
- Good braking performance
Cons
- Can lose traction easily when cold or under heavy throttle
- Potential for wheel spin in wet conditions for quicker or more powerful cars
- Can wear relatively quickly due to a softer rubber compound
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Vredestein Hi Trac 2 | B · Yokohama A539 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | — | 6 |
| Rim diameters | — | 12″ – 14″ |
Which one should you actually buy?
70
/ 100
Vredestein Hi Trac 2
69
/ 100
Yokohama A539
Too close to call: Vredestein Hi Trac 2 and Yokohama A539 are within 2 points overall. Vredestein Hi Trac 2 is stronger on wet. Yokohama A539 is stronger on handling.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Vredestein Hi Trac 2 scores 74 vs 70 on wet.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Yokohama A539 scores 74 vs 71 on handling.
Tire A · Vredestein Hi Trac 2
Tire B · Yokohama A539
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.