tirewheelguide

Vredestein Hi Trac 2 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Vredestein Hi Trac 2 vs Yokohama A539 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 5 + 105 owner reviews. How we score

Hi Trac 2 leads, 71–69 Narrow edge

Check price on Amazon · Hi Trac 2 or A539 on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Vredestein Hi Trac 2
Tire AVredestein

Hi Trac 2

Summer

± 8Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 71 · 5 reviews

Yokohama A539
Tire BYokohama

A539

Summer

± 8

Tests – · none yet Owners 69 · 105 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 68

    Dry

    Level
    68
    Why this score
    SourceHi Trac 2A539
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online6968

    Hi Trac 2: 60% × 68.3 (est.) + 40% × 68.8 = 68

    A539: 60% × 67.8 (est.) + 40% × 67.6 = 68

    No road tests of dry for Hi Trac 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

    No road tests of dry for A539. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 75

    Wet

    Hi Trac 2 +4
    71
    Why this score
    SourceHi Trac 2A539
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 74 (est.)≈ 71 (est.)
    Reviews found online7671

    Hi Trac 2: 60% × 73.7 (est.) + 40% × 76.1 = 75

    A539: 60% × 70.7 (est.) + 40% × 70.7 = 71

    No road tests of wet for Hi Trac 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for A539. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 69

    Comfort

    Level
    69
    Why this score
    SourceHi Trac 2A539
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online6969

    Hi Trac 2: 40% × 68.7 (est.) + 60% × 68.7 = 69

    A539: 40% × 68.8 (est.) + 60% × 69.2 = 69

    No road tests of comfort for Hi Trac 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

    No road tests of comfort for A539. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  4. 69

    Treadwear

    Hi Trac 2 +2
    67
    Why this score
    SourceHi Trac 2A539
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online7067

    Hi Trac 2: 60% × 67.8 (est.) + 40% × 70 = 69

    A539: 60% × 66.8 (est.) + 40% × 67.2 = 67

    No road tests of treadwear for Hi Trac 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

    No road tests of treadwear for A539. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  5. 71

    Handling (owners)

    A539 +3
    74
    Why this score
    SourceHi Trac 2A539
    Reviews found online7174
Scores at a glance
CategoryVredestein Hi Trac 2Yokohama A539
Relative Score 71 69
Dry 68 68
Wet 75 71
Comfort 69 69
Treadwear 69 67
Handling (owners) 71 74

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

Hi Trac 2

± 8

A539

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Hi Trac 2

Pros

  • Strong wet weather grip and braking performance
  • Quiet operation compared to factory-fitted alternatives
  • Good traction for acceleration and braking

Cons

  • Poor tread longevity, with some users reporting significant wear under 10,000 miles
  • Soft sidewalls leading to a 'wobbly' sensation or excessive flex during cornering
  • Lack of lateral grip in dry conditions
All owner themes in the Hi Trac 2 review

Tire B A539

Pros

  • Excellent dry and wet cornering grip
  • Predictable and dependable handling during spirited driving
  • Good braking performance

Cons

  • Can lose traction easily when cold or under heavy throttle
  • Potential for wheel spin in wet conditions for quicker or more powerful cars
  • Can wear relatively quickly due to a softer rubber compound
All owner themes in the A539 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Vredestein Hi Trac 2 B · Yokohama A539
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available—6
Rim diameters—12″ – 14″

Which one should you actually buy?

Vredestein Hi Trac 2

Yokohama A539

Narrow edge: Vredestein Hi Trac 2 — better wet. Where the Yokohama A539 is ahead, it is by less than 3 points. Vredestein Hi Trac 2 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 5 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Vredestein Hi Trac 2 scores 75 vs 71 on wet.

Tire A · Vredestein Hi Trac 2
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Yokohama A539
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Hi Trac 2 or A539?

Which is better in the wet, Hi Trac 2 or A539?

Vredestein Hi Trac 2, 75 vs 71 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Hi Trac 2 or A539?

Neither, by our numbers: 68 vs 68 on the dry score, within 3 points.

Which is more comfortable, Hi Trac 2 or A539?

Neither, by our numbers: 69 vs 69 on the comfort score, within 3 points.

Which lasts longer, Hi Trac 2 or A539?

Neither, by our numbers: 69 vs 67 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology