Tests – · none yet Owners 71 · 5 reviews
Vredestein Hi Trac 2 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Vredestein Hi Trac 2 vs Yokohama BluEarth RV02 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 2 road tests and 5 + 8 owner reviews. How we score
Hi Trac 2 is ahead, 71–65
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 64 · 2 tests Owners 65 · 8 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
68
Dry
Hi Trac 2 +662Why this score
Source Hi Trac 2 BluEarth RV02 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 68 (est.) 58 Reviews found online 69 68 Hi Trac 2: 60% × 68.3 (est.) + 40% × 68.8 = 68
BluEarth RV02: 60% × 58.4 + 40% × 67.6 = 62
No road tests of dry for Hi Trac 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
75
Wet
Hi Trac 2 +669Why this score
Source Hi Trac 2 BluEarth RV02 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 74 (est.) 67 Reviews found online 76 72 Hi Trac 2: 60% × 73.7 (est.) + 40% × 76.1 = 75
BluEarth RV02: 60% × 67 + 40% × 72.2 = 69
No road tests of wet for Hi Trac 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
69
Comfort
Hi Trac 2 +366Why this score
Source Hi Trac 2 BluEarth RV02 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 69 (est.) 61 Reviews found online 69 69 Hi Trac 2: 40% × 68.7 (est.) + 60% × 68.7 = 69
BluEarth RV02: 40% × 61.3 + 60% × 69 = 66
No road tests of comfort for Hi Trac 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
–
Noise
No comparison65Why this score
Source Hi Trac 2 BluEarth RV02 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests – 64 Reviews found online – ≈ 66 (est.) BluEarth RV02: 60% × 64.1 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 65
No owner ratings of noise for BluEarth RV02. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
-
69
Treadwear
Hi Trac 2 +861Why this score
Source Hi Trac 2 BluEarth RV02 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 68 (est.) 67 Reviews found online 70 52 Hi Trac 2: 60% × 67.8 (est.) + 40% × 70 = 69
BluEarth RV02: 60% × 66.7 + 40% × 51.9 = 61
No road tests of treadwear for Hi Trac 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
71
Handling (owners)
Hi Trac 2 +269Why this score
Source Hi Trac 2 BluEarth RV02 Reviews found online 71 69 -
–
Efficiency
No comparison71Why this score
Source Hi Trac 2 BluEarth RV02 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests – 71
Scores at a glance
| Category | Vredestein Hi Trac 2 | Yokohama BluEarth RV02 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 71 | 65 |
| Dry | 68 | 62 |
| Wet | 75 | 69 |
| Comfort | 69 | 66 |
| Noise | – | 65 |
| Treadwear | 69 | 61 |
| Handling (owners) | 71 | 69 |
| Efficiency | – | 71 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Hi Trac 2
BluEarth RV02
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Hi Trac 2
Pros
- Strong wet weather grip and braking performance
- Quiet operation compared to factory-fitted alternatives
- Good traction for acceleration and braking
Cons
- Poor tread longevity, with some users reporting significant wear under 10,000 miles
- Soft sidewalls leading to a 'wobbly' sensation or excessive flex during cornering
- Lack of lateral grip in dry conditions
Tire B BluEarth RV02
Pros
- Exceptional wet and dry surface grip
- High levels of ride comfort and low road noise
- Improved vehicle stability for tall-profile vehicles like MPVs and SUVs
Cons
- Noticeable increase in noise and decrease in comfort as tread wears down
- Reports of premature sidewall or tread cracking
- Inconsistent tread life, with some users noting rapid wear due to softer compounds
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Vredestein Hi Trac 2 | B · Yokohama BluEarth RV02 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | — | 4 |
| Rim diameters | — | 17″ – 18″ |
Which one should you actually buy?
Vredestein Hi Trac 2
Yokohama BluEarth RV02
Winner: Vredestein Hi Trac 2 — better treadwear, dry and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score. Vredestein Hi Trac 2 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 5 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Vredestein Hi Trac 2 scores 69 vs 61 on treadwear.
Vredestein Hi Trac 2 scores 68 vs 62 on dry.
Vredestein Hi Trac 2 scores 75 vs 69 on wet.
Vredestein Hi Trac 2 scores 69 vs 66 on comfort.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Hi Trac 2 or BluEarth RV02?
Which is better in the wet, Hi Trac 2 or BluEarth RV02?
Vredestein Hi Trac 2, 75 vs 69 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Hi Trac 2 or BluEarth RV02?
Vredestein Hi Trac 2, 68 vs 62 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, Hi Trac 2 or BluEarth RV02?
Vredestein Hi Trac 2, 69 vs 66 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Hi Trac 2 or BluEarth RV02?
Vredestein Hi Trac 2, 69 vs 61 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology