tirewheelguide

Hankook Dynapro AS RH03 is discontinued — replaced by Hankook Dynapro HT RH12. Compare Dynapro HT RH12 with Destination A/T

Head-to-head Updated

Firestone Destination A/T vs Hankook Dynapro AS RH03 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 80 + 3 owner reviews. How we score

Destination A/T is ahead, 68–57

Check price on Amazon · Destination A/T or Dynapro AS RH03 on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Firestone Destination A/T
Tire AFirestone

Destination A/T

All Season All Terrain and Off Road tires

Tests – · none yet Owners 68 · 80 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 67

    Dry

    Destination A/T +11
    56
    Why this score
    SourceDestination A/TDynapro AS RH03
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 60 (est.)
    Reviews found online6749

    Destination A/T: 60% × 67.6 (est.) + 40% × 67.3 = 67

    Dynapro AS RH03: 60% × 60.2 (est.) + 40% × 49 = 56

    No road tests of dry for Destination A/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

    No road tests of dry for Dynapro AS RH03. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 70

    Wet

    Destination A/T +13
    57
    Why this score
    SourceDestination A/TDynapro AS RH03
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 70 (est.)≈ 60 (est.)
    Reviews found online7053

    Destination A/T: 60% × 69.8 (est.) + 40% × 69.8 = 70

    Dynapro AS RH03: 60% × 60.3 (est.) + 40% × 52.8 = 57

    No road tests of wet for Destination A/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

    No road tests of wet for Dynapro AS RH03. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 69

    Snow

    Destination A/T +14
    55
    Why this score
    SourceDestination A/TDynapro AS RH03
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 62 (est.)
    Reviews found online6845

    Destination A/T: 60% × 69.4 (est.) + 40% × 68.3 = 69

    Dynapro AS RH03: 60% × 61.6 (est.) + 40% × 44.8 = 55

    No road tests of snow for Destination A/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

    No road tests of snow for Dynapro AS RH03. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

  4. 68

    Comfort

    Destination A/T +9
    59
    Why this score
    SourceDestination A/TDynapro AS RH03
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online6748

    Destination A/T: 60% × 68.8 (est.) + 40% × 67.1 = 68

    Dynapro AS RH03: 60% × 65.5 (est.) + 40% × 48.3 = 59

    No road tests of comfort for Destination A/T or Dynapro AS RH03. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 69

    Noise

    Destination A/T +8
    61
    Why this score
    SourceDestination A/TDynapro AS RH03
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online7151

    Destination A/T: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 70.9 = 69

    Dynapro AS RH03: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 50.7 = 61

    No road tests of noise for Destination A/T or Dynapro AS RH03. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 67

    Treadwear

    Destination A/T +7
    60
    Why this score
    SourceDestination A/TDynapro AS RH03
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 63 (est.)
    Reviews found online6856

    Destination A/T: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 68.3 = 67

    Dynapro AS RH03: 60% × 62.8 (est.) + 40% × 56.3 = 60

    No road tests of treadwear for Destination A/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

    No road tests of treadwear for Dynapro AS RH03. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  7. 65

    Handling (owners)

    Destination A/T +16
    49
    Why this score
    SourceDestination A/TDynapro AS RH03
    Reviews found online6549
Scores at a glance
CategoryFirestone Destination A/THankook Dynapro AS RH03
Relative Score 68 57
Dry 67 56
Wet 70 57
Snow 69 55
Comfort 68 59
Noise 69 61
Treadwear 67 60
Handling (owners) 65 49

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Destination A/T

Dynapro AS RH03

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Destination A/T

Pros

  • Exceptional ride comfort and low road noise for an all-terrain tire
  • Strong value proposition with competitive pricing
  • Reliable traction in diverse conditions including snow, sand, and wet pavement

Cons

  • Noticeable decline in wet-weather traction as tread depth wears down
  • Tendency to hydroplane in deep standing water
  • Limited performance in deep, thick mud compared to more aggressive mud-terrain tires
All owner themes in the Destination A/T review

Tire B Dynapro AS RH03

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Firestone Destination A/T B · Hankook Dynapro AS RH03
CategoryAll Season All Terrain and Off Road tiresAll-Season tire
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4SUV and 4x4
Tread depth14/32″14/32″
UTQG460 A B—
SidewallOutlined White LetteringBlackwall
Max pressure50 psi80 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

Firestone Destination A/T

Hankook Dynapro AS RH03

Winner: Firestone Destination A/T — better handling, snow and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score. Hankook Dynapro AS RH03 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 3 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Firestone Destination A/T scores 65 vs 49 on handling.

Pick tire A You drive through snowy winters

Firestone Destination A/T scores 69 vs 55 on snow.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Firestone Destination A/T scores 70 vs 57 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Firestone Destination A/T scores 67 vs 56 on dry.

Tire A · Firestone Destination A/T
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Hankook Dynapro AS RH03
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Destination A/T or Dynapro AS RH03?

Which is better in the wet, Destination A/T or Dynapro AS RH03?

Firestone Destination A/T, 70 vs 57 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Destination A/T or Dynapro AS RH03?

Firestone Destination A/T, 67 vs 56 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, Destination A/T or Dynapro AS RH03?

Firestone Destination A/T, 69 vs 55 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, Destination A/T or Dynapro AS RH03?

Firestone Destination A/T, 69 vs 61 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, Destination A/T or Dynapro AS RH03?

Firestone Destination A/T, 68 vs 59 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Destination A/T or Dynapro AS RH03?

Firestone Destination A/T, 67 vs 60 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology