Tests – · none yet Owners 68 · 80 reviews
Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Head-to-head
Updated
Firestone Destination A/T vs Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 80 + 12 owner reviews. How we score
Destination A/T is ahead, 68–61
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 59 · 12 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
67
Dry
Destination A/T +661Why this score
Source Destination A/T Geolandar G055 Blue Earth Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 64 (est.) Reviews found online 67 58 Destination A/T: 60% × 67.6 (est.) + 40% × 67.3 = 67
Geolandar G055 Blue Earth: 60% × 63.8 (est.) + 40% × 58 = 61
No road tests of dry for Destination A/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
No road tests of dry for Geolandar G055 Blue Earth. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
-
70
Wet
Destination A/T +1357Why this score
Source Destination A/T Geolandar G055 Blue Earth Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 70 (est.) ≈ 60 (est.) Reviews found online 70 53 Destination A/T: 60% × 69.8 (est.) + 40% × 69.8 = 70
Geolandar G055 Blue Earth: 60% × 60.3 (est.) + 40% × 52.9 = 57
No road tests of wet for Destination A/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
No road tests of wet for Geolandar G055 Blue Earth. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
-
69
Snow
No comparison–Why this score
Source Destination A/T Geolandar G055 Blue Earth Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) – Reviews found online 68 – Destination A/T: 60% × 69.4 (est.) + 40% × 68.3 = 69
No road tests of snow for Destination A/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
-
68
Comfort
Destination A/T +365Why this score
Source Destination A/T Geolandar G055 Blue Earth Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 67 62 Destination A/T: 60% × 68.8 (est.) + 40% × 67.1 = 68
Geolandar G055 Blue Earth: 60% × 67.9 (est.) + 40% × 61.8 = 65
No road tests of comfort for Destination A/T or Geolandar G055 Blue Earth. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
69
Noise
No comparison–Why this score
Source Destination A/T Geolandar G055 Blue Earth Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) – Reviews found online 71 – Destination A/T: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 70.9 = 69
No road tests of noise for Destination A/T. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
67
Treadwear
Destination A/T +265Why this score
Source Destination A/T Geolandar G055 Blue Earth Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 65 (est.) Reviews found online 68 64 Destination A/T: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 68.3 = 67
Geolandar G055 Blue Earth: 60% × 65.1 (est.) + 40% × 64 = 65
No road tests of treadwear for Destination A/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
No road tests of treadwear for Geolandar G055 Blue Earth. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
-
65
Handling (owners)
Destination A/T +758Why this score
Source Destination A/T Geolandar G055 Blue Earth Reviews found online 65 58
Scores at a glance
| Category | Firestone Destination A/T | Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 68 | 61 |
| Dry | 67 | 61 |
| Wet | 70 | 57 |
| Snow | 69 | – |
| Comfort | 68 | 65 |
| Noise | 69 | – |
| Treadwear | 67 | 65 |
| Handling (owners) | 65 | 58 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
68
/ 100
Destination A/T
61
/ 100
Geolandar G055 Blue Earth
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Destination A/T
Pros
- Exceptional ride comfort and low road noise for an all-terrain tire
- Strong value proposition with competitive pricing
- Reliable traction in diverse conditions including snow, sand, and wet pavement
Cons
- Noticeable decline in wet-weather traction as tread depth wears down
- Tendency to hydroplane in deep standing water
- Limited performance in deep, thick mud compared to more aggressive mud-terrain tires
Tire B Geolandar G055 Blue Earth
Pros
- Extremely quiet and comfortable ride quality
- Improved fuel economy and low rolling resistance
- Adequate dry road grip and handling
Cons
- Dangerous or unreliable wet weather traction, particularly lateral grip and cornering
- Prone to wheel spin on damp or wet surfaces
- Accelerated or uneven tread wear reported on certain crossover and SUV models
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Firestone Destination A/T | B · Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season All Terrain and Off Road tires | Summer |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | SUV and 4x4 |
| Tread depth | 14/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 460 A B | — |
| Sidewall | Outlined White Lettering | — |
| Max pressure | 50 psi | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
68
/ 100
Firestone Destination A/T
61
/ 100
Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth
Winner: Firestone Destination A/T — better wet, handling and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score. Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 12 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Firestone Destination A/T scores 70 vs 57 on wet.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Firestone Destination A/T scores 65 vs 58 on handling.
Pick tire A
You want the most grip on dry roads
Firestone Destination A/T scores 67 vs 61 on dry.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
Firestone Destination A/T scores 68 vs 65 on comfort.
Tire A · Firestone Destination A/T
Tire B · Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Destination A/T or Geolandar G055 Blue Earth?
Which is better in the wet, Destination A/T or Geolandar G055 Blue Earth?
Firestone Destination A/T, 70 vs 57 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Destination A/T or Geolandar G055 Blue Earth?
Firestone Destination A/T, 67 vs 61 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, Destination A/T or Geolandar G055 Blue Earth?
Firestone Destination A/T, 68 vs 65 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Destination A/T or Geolandar G055 Blue Earth?
Neither, by our numbers: 67 vs 65 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology