Tests – · 1 test Owners 74 · 9 reviews
Best test result: #5 of 18 in 2022 Consumer Reports All Terrain Truck Tires (tested tread life (miles))
Head-to-head
Updated
Firestone Destination A/T2 vs Yokohama Geolander A/T G015 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 1 + 0 road tests and 9 + 0 owner reviews. How we score
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners – · none yet
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
69
Dry
No comparison–Why this score
Source Destination A/T2 Geolander A/T G015 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) – Reviews found online 70 – Destination A/T2: 60% × 69 (est.) + 40% × 70.2 = 69
No road tests of dry for Destination A/T2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
78
Wet
No comparison–Why this score
Source Destination A/T2 Geolander A/T G015 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 77 (est.) – Reviews found online 81 – Destination A/T2: 60% × 76.6 (est.) + 40% × 81.3 = 78
No road tests of wet for Destination A/T2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
74
Snow
No comparison–Why this score
Source Destination A/T2 Geolander A/T G015 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 72 (est.) – Reviews found online 75 – Destination A/T2: 60% × 72.5 (est.) + 40% × 75.3 = 74
No road tests of snow for Destination A/T2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).
-
73
Comfort
No comparison–Why this score
Source Destination A/T2 Geolander A/T G015 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 70 (est.) – Reviews found online 75 – Destination A/T2: 40% × 70.1 (est.) + 60% × 74.6 = 73
No road tests of comfort for Destination A/T2. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
69
Noise
No comparison–Why this score
Source Destination A/T2 Geolander A/T G015 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) – Reviews found online 73 – Destination A/T2: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 72.6 = 69
No road tests of noise for Destination A/T2. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
70
Treadwear
No comparison–Why this score
Source Destination A/T2 Geolander A/T G015 Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests 71 – Reviews found online 69 – Destination A/T2: 60% × 71.1 + 40% × 69.1 = 70
-
72
Handling (owners)
No comparison–Why this score
Source Destination A/T2 Geolander A/T G015 Reviews found online 72 –
Scores at a glance
| Category | Firestone Destination A/T2 | Yokohama Geolander A/T G015 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 73 | – |
| Dry | 69 | – |
| Wet | 78 | – |
| Snow | 74 | – |
| Comfort | 73 | – |
| Noise | 69 | – |
| Treadwear | 70 | – |
| Handling (owners) | 72 | – |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
73
/ 100
Destination A/T2
–
/ 100
Geolander A/T G015
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Destination A/T2
Pros
- Exceptional wet weather traction and grip
- Strong performance in snow with 3PMS rating
- Quiet and smooth ride quality at highway speeds
Cons
- Vague or unresponsive steering feedback
- Questionable durability on sharp rocks or rough forest service roads
- Stiffer ride compared to factory street tires
Tire B Geolander A/T G015
Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Firestone Destination A/T2 | B · Yokohama Geolander A/T G015 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All-Terrain tire | All-Terrain tire |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 33 | — |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 22″ | — |
| Tread depth | 10 - 12/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 540 - 560 A B | — |
| Treadwear warranty | 55,000 mi | — |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall - Raised Outline White Lettering | — |
| Max pressure | 44 - 50 psi | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
73
/ 100
Firestone Destination A/T2
–
/ 100
Yokohama Geolander A/T G015
Only Firestone Destination A/T2 has enough test and review data for a Relative Score, so there is no head-to-head winner yet.
Tire A · Firestone Destination A/T2
Tire B · Yokohama Geolander A/T G015
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology