Tests – · none yet Owners 67 · 102 reviews
Firestone Destination LE2 vs Hankook Ventus ST — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 1 road tests and 102 + 23 owner reviews. How we score
Ventus ST is ahead, 76–67
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
67
Dry
Ventus ST +875Why this score
Source Destination LE2 Ventus ST Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 67 (est.) 71 Reviews found online 66 83 Destination LE2: 60% × 67.2 (est.) + 40% × 66.2 = 67
Ventus ST: 60% × 70.6 + 40% × 82.7 = 75
No road tests of dry for Destination LE2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
69
Wet
Ventus ST +978Why this score
Source Destination LE2 Ventus ST Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 70 (est.) 75 Reviews found online 69 83 Destination LE2: 60% × 69.6 (est.) + 40% × 68.6 = 69
Ventus ST: 60% × 74.7 + 40% × 83.1 = 78
No road tests of wet for Destination LE2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
66
Snow
No comparison–Why this score
Source Destination LE2 Ventus ST Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) – Reviews found online 63 – Destination LE2: 60% × 68.1 (est.) + 40% × 63 = 66
No road tests of snow for Destination LE2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
63
Comfort
Ventus ST +1376Why this score
Source Destination LE2 Ventus ST Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 71 (est.) Reviews found online 61 79 Destination LE2: 40% × 67 (est.) + 60% × 60.6 = 63
Ventus ST: 40% × 70.8 (est.) + 60% × 79.3 = 76
No road tests of comfort for Destination LE2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for Ventus ST. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
68
Noise
Level68Why this score
Source Destination LE2 Ventus ST Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 66 (est.) 69 Reviews found online 71 ≈ 66 (est.) Destination LE2: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 71 = 68
Ventus ST: 60% × 69.1 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 68
No road tests of noise for Destination LE2. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
No owner ratings of noise for Ventus ST. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
-
68
Treadwear
Ventus ST +977Why this score
Source Destination LE2 Ventus ST Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 73 (est.) Reviews found online 69 84 Destination LE2: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 68.8 = 68
Ventus ST: 60% × 72.9 (est.) + 40% × 84.3 = 77
No road tests of treadwear for Destination LE2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for Ventus ST. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
66
Handling (owners)
Ventus ST +1783Why this score
Source Destination LE2 Ventus ST Reviews found online 66 83 -
–
Efficiency
No comparison57Why this score
Source Destination LE2 Ventus ST Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests – 57
Scores at a glance
| Category | Firestone Destination LE2 | Hankook Ventus ST |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 67 | 76 |
| Dry | 67 | 75 |
| Wet | 69 | 78 |
| Snow | 66 | – |
| Comfort | 63 | 76 |
| Noise | 68 | 68 |
| Treadwear | 68 | 77 |
| Handling (owners) | 66 | 83 |
| Efficiency | – | 57 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Destination LE2
Ventus ST
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Destination LE2
Pros
- Excellent dry and wet traction
- Affordable, high-value pricing
- Quiet and comfortable highway ride
Cons
- Tendency to pick up and retain small stones from gravel roads
- Occasional reports of higher-than-expected road noise on specific vehicle models
- Isolated instances of balancing difficulties or premature wear
Tire B Ventus ST
Pros
- Exceptional tread life and long-lasting durability, often doubling the mileage of competing tires
- Significantly reduced road noise and improved ride comfort compared to factory-fitted premium tires
- Strong dry grip and dependable, predictable wet-weather performance
Cons
- Slightly reduced feedback or a skating sensation in heavy standing water/deep puddles
- Occasional reports of increased road noise as the tires approach the end of their tread life
- Availability can sometimes be limited depending on the region and retailer
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Firestone Destination LE2 | B · Hankook Ventus ST |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All-Season tire | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 5 | 10 |
| Rim diameters | 16″ – 18″ | 17″ – 22″ |
| Tread depth | 11/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 520 A B | — |
| Treadwear warranty | 60,000 mi | — |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | — |
| Max pressure | 44 psi | — |
| Sizes in common | 0 | 0 |
Which one should you actually buy?
Firestone Destination LE2
Hankook Ventus ST
Winner: Hankook Ventus ST — better handling, comfort and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Hankook Ventus ST scores 83 vs 66 on handling.
Hankook Ventus ST scores 76 vs 63 on comfort.
Hankook Ventus ST scores 78 vs 69 on wet.
Hankook Ventus ST scores 77 vs 68 on treadwear.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Destination LE2 or Ventus ST?
Which is better in the wet, Destination LE2 or Ventus ST?
Hankook Ventus ST, 78 vs 69 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Destination LE2 or Ventus ST?
Hankook Ventus ST, 75 vs 67 on our dry score.
Which is quieter, Destination LE2 or Ventus ST?
Neither, by our numbers: 68 vs 68 on the noise score, within 3 points.
Which is more comfortable, Destination LE2 or Ventus ST?
Hankook Ventus ST, 76 vs 63 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Destination LE2 or Ventus ST?
Hankook Ventus ST, 77 vs 68 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology