Tests – · none yet Owners 49 · 10 reviews
Head-to-head
Updated
Michelin Energy Saver A/S vs Hankook Ventus ST — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 1 road tests and 10 + 22 owner reviews. How we score
Ventus ST is ahead, 74–56
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
56
Dry
Ventus ST +1874Why this score
Source Energy Saver A/S Ventus ST Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 60 (est.) 71 Reviews found online 49 78 Energy Saver A/S: 60% × 60.2 (est.) + 40% × 49 = 56
Ventus ST: 60% × 70.6 + 40% × 78.4 = 74
No road tests of dry for Energy Saver A/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
-
54
Wet
Ventus ST +2276Why this score
Source Energy Saver A/S Ventus ST Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 58 (est.) 75 Reviews found online 49 78 Energy Saver A/S: 60% × 57.9 (est.) + 40% × 48.5 = 54
Ventus ST: 60% × 74.5 + 40% × 77.6 = 76
No road tests of wet for Energy Saver A/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
-
54
Snow
No comparison–Why this score
Source Energy Saver A/S Ventus ST Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 61 (est.) – Reviews found online 43 – Energy Saver A/S: 60% × 61.1 (est.) + 40% × 43.3 = 54
No road tests of snow for Energy Saver A/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
-
60
Comfort
Ventus ST +1373Why this score
Source Energy Saver A/S Ventus ST Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 50 76 Energy Saver A/S: 60% × 65.9 (est.) + 40% × 50.3 = 60
Ventus ST: 60% × 70.4 (est.) + 40% × 76.4 = 73
No road tests of comfort for Energy Saver A/S or Ventus ST. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
61
Noise
Ventus ST +768Why this score
Source Energy Saver A/S Ventus ST Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 67 (est.) 69 Reviews found online 53 ≈ 67 (est.) Energy Saver A/S: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 52.7 = 61
Ventus ST: 60% × 69 + 40% × 67.3 (est.) = 68
No road tests of noise for Energy Saver A/S. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
No owner ratings of noise for Ventus ST. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
-
57
Treadwear
Ventus ST +1572Why this score
Source Energy Saver A/S Ventus ST Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 61 (est.) ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online 51 77 Energy Saver A/S: 60% × 61.2 (est.) + 40% × 51.1 = 57
Ventus ST: 60% × 69.2 (est.) + 40% × 77.2 = 72
No road tests of treadwear for Energy Saver A/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
No road tests of treadwear for Ventus ST. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
-
50
Handling (owners)
Ventus ST +2979Why this score
Source Energy Saver A/S Ventus ST Reviews found online 50 79
Scores at a glance
| Category | Michelin Energy Saver A/S | Hankook Ventus ST |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 56 | 74 |
| Dry | 56 | 74 |
| Wet | 54 | 76 |
| Snow | 54 | – |
| Comfort | 60 | 73 |
| Noise | 61 | 68 |
| Treadwear | 57 | 72 |
| Handling (owners) | 50 | 79 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
56
/ 100
Energy Saver A/S
74
/ 100
Ventus ST
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Energy Saver A/S
Pros
- High fuel economy and rolling efficiency
- Potential for high mileage in specific driving conditions
- Reliable dry weather traction for some users
Cons
- Significant hydroplaning tendencies in wet conditions
- Inconsistent tread life, with reports of premature wear
- Excessive road noise and audible squealing during cornering
Tire B Ventus ST
Pros
- Exceptional tread life and long-lasting durability, often doubling the mileage of competing tires
- Significantly reduced road noise and improved ride comfort compared to factory-fitted premium tires
- Strong dry grip and dependable, predictable wet-weather performance
Cons
- Slightly reduced feedback or a skating sensation in heavy standing water/deep puddles
- Occasional reports of increased road noise as the tires approach the end of their tread life
- Availability can sometimes be limited depending on the region and retailer
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Michelin Energy Saver A/S | B · Hankook Ventus ST |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | — | 10 |
| Rim diameters | — | 17″ – 22″ |
Which one should you actually buy?
56
/ 100
Michelin Energy Saver A/S
74
/ 100
Hankook Ventus ST
Winner: Hankook Ventus ST — better handling, wet and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score. Michelin Energy Saver A/S rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 10 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Hankook Ventus ST scores 79 vs 50 on handling.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Hankook Ventus ST scores 76 vs 54 on wet.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Hankook Ventus ST scores 74 vs 56 on dry.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Hankook Ventus ST scores 72 vs 57 on treadwear.
Tire A · Michelin Energy Saver A/S
Tire B · Hankook Ventus ST
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Energy Saver A/S or Ventus ST?
Which is better in the wet, Energy Saver A/S or Ventus ST?
Hankook Ventus ST, 76 vs 54 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Energy Saver A/S or Ventus ST?
Hankook Ventus ST, 74 vs 56 on our dry score.
Which is quieter, Energy Saver A/S or Ventus ST?
Hankook Ventus ST, 68 vs 61 on our noise score.
Which is more comfortable, Energy Saver A/S or Ventus ST?
Hankook Ventus ST, 73 vs 60 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Energy Saver A/S or Ventus ST?
Hankook Ventus ST, 72 vs 57 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology