tirewheelguide

Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Firestone Destination LE2 vs Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 102 + 12 owner reviews. How we score

Destination LE2 is ahead, 68–61

Check price on Amazon · Destination LE2 or Geolandar G055 Blue Earth on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 68

    Dry

    Destination LE2 +7
    61
    Why this score
    SourceDestination LE2Geolandar G055 Blue Earth
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 64 (est.)
    Reviews found online6858

    Destination LE2: 60% × 67.6 (est.) + 40% × 67.5 = 68

    Geolandar G055 Blue Earth: 60% × 63.8 (est.) + 40% × 58 = 61

    No road tests of dry for Destination LE2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

    No road tests of dry for Geolandar G055 Blue Earth. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 69

    Wet

    Destination LE2 +12
    57
    Why this score
    SourceDestination LE2Geolandar G055 Blue Earth
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 60 (est.)
    Reviews found online6953

    Destination LE2: 60% × 69.4 (est.) + 40% × 69.1 = 69

    Geolandar G055 Blue Earth: 60% × 60.3 (est.) + 40% × 52.9 = 57

    No road tests of wet for Destination LE2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

    No road tests of wet for Geolandar G055 Blue Earth. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 66

    Snow

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceDestination LE2Geolandar G055 Blue Earth
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)–
    Reviews found online63–

    Destination LE2: 60% × 67.5 (est.) + 40% × 62.8 = 66

    No road tests of snow for Destination LE2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

  4. 66

    Comfort

    Destination LE2 +1
    65
    Why this score
    SourceDestination LE2Geolandar G055 Blue Earth
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online6462

    Destination LE2: 60% × 68.2 (est.) + 40% × 63.5 = 66

    Geolandar G055 Blue Earth: 60% × 67.9 (est.) + 40% × 61.8 = 65

    No road tests of comfort for Destination LE2 or Geolandar G055 Blue Earth. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 69

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceDestination LE2Geolandar G055 Blue Earth
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)–
    Reviews found online72–

    Destination LE2: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 71.6 = 69

    No road tests of noise for Destination LE2. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 67

    Treadwear

    Destination LE2 +2
    65
    Why this score
    SourceDestination LE2Geolandar G055 Blue Earth
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 65 (est.)
    Reviews found online6764

    Destination LE2: 60% × 66.2 (est.) + 40% × 67.4 = 67

    Geolandar G055 Blue Earth: 60% × 65.1 (est.) + 40% × 64 = 65

    No road tests of treadwear for Destination LE2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

    No road tests of treadwear for Geolandar G055 Blue Earth. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  7. 68

    Handling (owners)

    Destination LE2 +10
    58
    Why this score
    SourceDestination LE2Geolandar G055 Blue Earth
    Reviews found online6858
Scores at a glance
CategoryFirestone Destination LE2Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth
Relative Score 68 61
Dry 68 61
Wet 69 57
Snow 66 –
Comfort 66 65
Noise 69 –
Treadwear 67 65
Handling (owners) 68 58

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Destination LE2

Geolandar G055 Blue Earth

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Destination LE2

Pros

  • Excellent dry and wet traction
  • Affordable, high-value pricing
  • Quiet and comfortable highway ride

Cons

  • Tendency to pick up and retain small stones from gravel roads
  • Occasional reports of higher-than-expected road noise on specific vehicle models
  • Isolated instances of balancing difficulties or premature wear
All owner themes in the Destination LE2 review

Tire B Geolandar G055 Blue Earth

Pros

  • Extremely quiet and comfortable ride quality
  • Improved fuel economy and low rolling resistance
  • Adequate dry road grip and handling

Cons

  • Dangerous or unreliable wet weather traction, particularly lateral grip and cornering
  • Prone to wheel spin on damp or wet surfaces
  • Accelerated or uneven tread wear reported on certain crossover and SUV models
All owner themes in the Geolandar G055 Blue Earth review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Firestone Destination LE2 B · Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth
CategoryAll-Season tireSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverSUV and 4x4
Sizes available5—
Rim diameters16″ – 18″—
Tread depth11/32″—
UTQG520 A B—
Treadwear warranty60,000 mi—
SidewallBlackwall—
Max pressure44 psi—

Which one should you actually buy?

Firestone Destination LE2

Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth

Winner: Firestone Destination LE2 — better wet, handling and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score. Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 12 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Firestone Destination LE2 scores 69 vs 57 on wet.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Firestone Destination LE2 scores 68 vs 58 on handling.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Firestone Destination LE2 scores 68 vs 61 on dry.

Tire A · Firestone Destination LE2
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Destination LE2 or Geolandar G055 Blue Earth?

Which is better in the wet, Destination LE2 or Geolandar G055 Blue Earth?

Firestone Destination LE2, 69 vs 57 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Destination LE2 or Geolandar G055 Blue Earth?

Firestone Destination LE2, 68 vs 61 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, Destination LE2 or Geolandar G055 Blue Earth?

Neither, by our numbers: 66 vs 65 on the comfort score, within 3 points.

Which lasts longer, Destination LE2 or Geolandar G055 Blue Earth?

Neither, by our numbers: 67 vs 65 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology