Tests – · none yet Owners 51 · 7 reviews
Firestone F590 vs Hankook Dynapro M/T — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.
Dynapro M/T is ahead, 65–55
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 65 · 5 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
53
Dry
Dynapro M/T +1265Why this score
Source F590 Dynapro M/T Reviews found online 45 64 -
55
Wet
Dynapro M/T +1368Why this score
Source F590 Dynapro M/T Reviews found online 50 67 -
–
Snow
No comparison69Why this score
Source F590 Dynapro M/T Reviews found online – 69 -
65
Comfort
F590 +362Why this score
Source F590 Dynapro M/T Reviews found online 60 54 -
61
Treadwear
Dynapro M/T +566Why this score
Source F590 Dynapro M/T Reviews found online 57 67 -
46
Handling
Dynapro M/T +1561Why this score
Source F590 Dynapro M/T Reviews found online 46 61
Scores at a glance
| Category | Firestone F590 | Hankook Dynapro M/T |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 55 | 65 |
| Dry | 53 | 65 |
| Wet | 55 | 68 |
| Snow | – | 69 |
| Comfort | 65 | 62 |
| Treadwear | 61 | 66 |
| Handling | 46 | 61 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neither tire has a score here yet, so this weight changes nothing.
F590
Dynapro M/T
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A F590
Pros
- Effective hydroplaning resistance in heavy rain
- Adequate dry grip for standard daily driving
- Reliable performance for basic commuting needs
Cons
- Poor traction during low-speed acceleration leading to wheel spin
- Premature tread wear and sidewall perishing
- Inconsistent wet weather performance causing safety concerns
Tire B Dynapro M/T
Pros
- Exceptional tread life and overall mileage considering heavy use
- Surprisingly low road noise for a mud-terrain tire
- Strong dry and off-road traction, often reducing the need for 4WD
Cons
- Severe loss of wet traction and dangerous slip/understeer tendencies as the rubber compound hardens over time
- Prone to slow punctures on the running surface under heavy loads
- Develops uneven wear patterns over extended high-mileage use
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Firestone F590 | B · Hankook Dynapro M/T |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | All Season |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | SUV and 4x4 |
Which one should you actually buy?
Firestone F590
Hankook Dynapro M/T
Winner: Hankook Dynapro M/T — better handling, wet and dry. Pick the Firestone F590 if comfort matters most to you.
Hankook Dynapro M/T scores 61 vs 46 on handling.
Hankook Dynapro M/T scores 68 vs 55 on wet.
Hankook Dynapro M/T scores 65 vs 53 on dry.
Hankook Dynapro M/T scores 66 vs 61 on treadwear.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.