tirewheelguide

Hankook Dynapro M/T looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Firestone Destination M/T2 vs Hankook Dynapro M/T — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 39 + 5 owner reviews. How we score

Too close to call: Destination M/T2 67, Dynapro M/T 66.

Check price on Amazon · Destination M/T2 Check price on Amazon · Dynapro M/T
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Hankook Dynapro M/T
Tire BHankook

Dynapro M/T

Mud-Terrain tire

± 8Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 65 · 5 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 67

    Dry

    Destination M/T2 +1
    66
    Why this score
    SourceDestination M/T2Dynapro M/T
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online6764

    Destination M/T2: 60% × 67.5 (est.) + 40% × 66.9 = 67

    Dynapro M/T: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 64.3 = 66

    No road tests of dry for Destination M/T2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

    No road tests of dry for Dynapro M/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 71

    Wet

    Destination M/T2 +3
    68
    Why this score
    SourceDestination M/T2Dynapro M/T
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 71 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online7166

    Destination M/T2: 60% × 71.1 (est.) + 40% × 71.4 = 71

    Dynapro M/T: 60% × 68.4 (est.) + 40% × 66.4 = 68

    No road tests of wet for Destination M/T2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for Dynapro M/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 71

    Snow

    Destination M/T2 +2
    69
    Why this score
    SourceDestination M/T2Dynapro M/T
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 71 (est.)≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online7168

    Destination M/T2: 60% × 70.5 (est.) + 40% × 70.6 = 71

    Dynapro M/T: 60% × 69.8 (est.) + 40% × 68.3 = 69

    No road tests of snow for Destination M/T2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

    No road tests of snow for Dynapro M/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 62

    Comfort

    Destination M/T2 +4
    58
    Why this score
    SourceDestination M/T2Dynapro M/T
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online5953

    Destination M/T2: 40% × 66.7 (est.) + 60% × 58.7 = 62

    Dynapro M/T: 40% × 65.5 (est.) + 60% × 53.2 = 58

    No road tests of comfort for Destination M/T2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

    No road tests of comfort for Dynapro M/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  5. 59

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceDestination M/T2Dynapro M/T
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)–
    Reviews found online47–

    Destination M/T2: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 47.3 = 59

    No road tests of noise for Destination M/T2. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 56

    Treadwear

    Dynapro M/T +10
    66
    Why this score
    SourceDestination M/T2Dynapro M/T
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 61 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online5066

    Destination M/T2: 60% × 60.6 (est.) + 40% × 50.1 = 56

    Dynapro M/T: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 66.2 = 66

    No road tests of treadwear for Destination M/T2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

    No road tests of treadwear for Dynapro M/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. –

    Handling (owners)

    No comparison
    61
    Why this score
    SourceDestination M/T2Dynapro M/T
    Reviews found online–61
Scores at a glance
CategoryFirestone Destination M/T2Hankook Dynapro M/T
Relative Score 67 66
Dry 67 66
Wet 71 68
Snow 71 69
Comfort 62 58
Noise 59 –
Treadwear 56 66
Handling (owners) – 61

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

Destination M/T2

± 8

Dynapro M/T

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Destination M/T2

Pros

  • Unexpectedly low road noise for a mud-terrain tire
  • Exceptional off-road traction in mud, sand, and deep snow
  • Good highway manners and stable handling

Cons

  • Can develop cupping and increased noise if maintenance/rotations are neglected
  • Slight initial slip on road paint during the first few thousand miles
  • Mixed reports on longevity when heavily utilized for towing or rough gravel service
All owner themes in the Destination M/T2 review

Tire B Dynapro M/T

Pros

  • Exceptional tread life and overall mileage considering heavy use
  • Surprisingly low road noise for a mud-terrain tire
  • Strong dry and off-road traction, often reducing the need for 4WD

Cons

  • Severe loss of wet traction and dangerous slip/understeer tendencies as the rubber compound hardens over time
  • Prone to slow punctures on the running surface under heavy loads
  • Develops uneven wear patterns over extended high-mileage use
All owner themes in the Dynapro M/T review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Firestone Destination M/T2 B · Hankook Dynapro M/T
CategoryMud-Terrain tireMud-Terrain tire
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4SUV and 4x4
Sizes available18—
Rim diameters15″ – 20″—
Tread depth19/32″—
SidewallOutlined White Lettering—
Max pressure50 psi—

Which one should you actually buy?

Firestone Destination M/T2

Hankook Dynapro M/T

Too close to call: Firestone Destination M/T2 and Hankook Dynapro M/T are within 2 points overall. Firestone Destination M/T2 is stronger on comfort and wet. Hankook Dynapro M/T is stronger on treadwear. Hankook Dynapro M/T rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 5 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Hankook Dynapro M/T scores 66 vs 56 on treadwear.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Firestone Destination M/T2 scores 62 vs 58 on comfort.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Firestone Destination M/T2 scores 71 vs 68 on wet.

Tire A · Firestone Destination M/T2
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Hankook Dynapro M/T
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Destination M/T2 or Dynapro M/T?

Which is better in the wet, Destination M/T2 or Dynapro M/T?

Firestone Destination M/T2, 71 vs 68 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Destination M/T2 or Dynapro M/T?

Neither, by our numbers: 67 vs 66 on the dry score, within 3 points.

Which is better in snow, Destination M/T2 or Dynapro M/T?

Neither, by our numbers: 71 vs 69 on the snow score, within 3 points.

Which is more comfortable, Destination M/T2 or Dynapro M/T?

Firestone Destination M/T2, 62 vs 58 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Destination M/T2 or Dynapro M/T?

Hankook Dynapro M/T, 66 vs 56 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology