Tests – · none yet Owners 63 · 39 reviews
Head-to-head
Updated
Firestone Destination M/T2 vs General Grabber A/TX — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 39 + 370 owner reviews. How we score
Grabber A/TX leads, 70–67 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 69 · 370 reviews
“275/60r20 General Grabber A/Tx Just thought I'd share what my truck looks like with a slightly larger tire size in case anyone wondered. No level, just stock. Good looking tires in my opinion.”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
68
Dry
Grabber A/TX +169Why this score
Source Destination M/T2 Grabber A/TX Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 68 69 Destination M/T2: 60% × 67.9 (est.) + 40% × 67.7 = 68
Grabber A/TX: 60% × 68.4 (est.) + 40% × 68.8 = 69
No road tests of dry for Destination M/T2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
No road tests of dry for Grabber A/TX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
72
Wet
Grabber A/TX +274Why this score
Source Destination M/T2 Grabber A/TX Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 71 (est.) ≈ 73 (est.) Reviews found online 72 75 Destination M/T2: 60% × 71.4 (est.) + 40% × 71.9 = 72
Grabber A/TX: 60% × 73.1 (est.) + 40% × 74.9 = 74
No road tests of wet for Destination M/T2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for Grabber A/TX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
71
Snow
Destination M/T2 +269Why this score
Source Destination M/T2 Grabber A/TX Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 71 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 72 67 Destination M/T2: 60% × 71.1 (est.) + 40% × 71.5 = 71
Grabber A/TX: 60% × 69.5 (est.) + 40% × 67.4 = 69
No road tests of snow for Destination M/T2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).
No road tests of snow for Grabber A/TX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).
-
63
Comfort
Level63Why this score
Source Destination M/T2 Grabber A/TX Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 60 59 Destination M/T2: 40% × 67.4 (est.) + 60% × 59.7 = 63
Grabber A/TX: 40% × 67.3 (est.) + 60% × 59.4 = 63
No road tests of comfort for Destination M/T2 or Grabber A/TX. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
59
Noise
Grabber A/TX +564Why this score
Source Destination M/T2 Grabber A/TX Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 48 60 Destination M/T2: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 48 = 59
Grabber A/TX: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 59.7 = 64
No road tests of noise for Destination M/T2 or Grabber A/TX. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
56
Treadwear
Grabber A/TX +1470Why this score
Source Destination M/T2 Grabber A/TX Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 61 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 50 72 Destination M/T2: 60% × 60.5 (est.) + 40% × 50.1 = 56
Grabber A/TX: 60% × 68.1 (est.) + 40% × 71.9 = 70
No road tests of treadwear for Destination M/T2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
No road tests of treadwear for Grabber A/TX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
-
–
Handling (owners)
No comparison58Why this score
Source Destination M/T2 Grabber A/TX Reviews found online – 58
Scores at a glance
| Category | Firestone Destination M/T2 | General Grabber A/TX |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 67 | 70 |
| Dry | 68 | 69 |
| Wet | 72 | 74 |
| Snow | 71 | 69 |
| Comfort | 63 | 63 |
| Noise | 59 | 64 |
| Treadwear | 56 | 70 |
| Handling (owners) | – | 58 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Recomputed
Headline score
67
/ 100
Destination M/T2
70
/ 100
Grabber A/TX
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Destination M/T2
Pros
- Unexpectedly low road noise for a mud-terrain tire
- Exceptional off-road traction in mud, sand, and deep snow
- Good highway manners and stable handling
Cons
- Can develop cupping and increased noise if maintenance/rotations are neglected
- Slight initial slip on road paint during the first few thousand miles
- Mixed reports on longevity when heavily utilized for towing or rough gravel service
Tire B Grabber A/TX
Pros
- Exceptional winter and snow traction (3-peak mountain snowflake rated)
- Impressively low road noise and high ride comfort for an aggressive all-terrain tire
- Strong wet and dry road grip with confident handling
Cons
- Noticeable decrease in fuel economy (MPG drop)
- Tread tends to pick up and throw small stones and pebbles
- Mixed reviews on long-term treadwear and longevity
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Tire A
Firestone Destination M/T2
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Tire B
Positive
General Grabber A/TX
Community sentiment toward the General Grabber A/TX is largely positive, with owners frequently praising its winter traction on snow and ice as well as its quiet highway ride. Buyers appreciate its availability in lighter standard load ratings and competitive pricing compared to rivals like the BFG KO2. Minor drawbacks cited include fuel economy loss with heavier LT versions and a tendency for the tread to pick up and fling gravel rocks.
f150forum.com
“Quote: Originally Posted by Teddydogno1 I think I am going to get these for my 2002 SCab FX4. Price and rating both seem very good. How do you like them (those that have them)? Rob I like them a lot. I have about 12000 miles on them. They have a little noise, but not bad if that is a factor for you. I am running them at 38 psi and the ride is a little softer. If I had one complaint, I run a lot of gravel roads and rocks will stick in the tread. When I get up to highway speed the rocks come out and come out hard. I have factory rims so my tires don't stick out beyond the fenders except a tiny bit. I have a couple nice rock chips on the side of my truck from that.”
jeepforum.com
·2021-10-12
“Thanks Coldcase, you always come through. Im thinking of going for the General Grabber A/Tx, 1 vehicle from the link you posted is using them and even a bigger size at 285 without any issue, difference is they have the altitude package instead of Overland. Do you think ill be fine?”
5thgenrams.com
·2019-12-14
“Not sure where those ratings are from but all the ratings I have seen on the tire have been on par with other at tires. all 4 cost me 765 installed. My traction in NEPA has been excellent in the snow and wet.”
Top themes
#Snow and ice traction#Highway road noise#Standard load availability#Fuel economy impact#Rock retention and throwing#Ride quality and PSI
Based on 37 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Firestone Destination M/T2 | B · General Grabber A/TX |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Mud-Terrain tire | All-Terrain tire |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 18 | 44 |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 20″ | 15″ – 22″ |
| Tread depth | 19/32″ | 14 - 17/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 640 A A - B |
| Sidewall | Outlined White Lettering | Black Side Wall - Raised White Lettering |
| Max pressure | 50 psi | 35 - 80 psi |
| Sizes in common | 14 | 14 |
Which one should you actually buy?
67
/ 100
Firestone Destination M/T2
70
/ 100
General Grabber A/TX
Narrow edge: General Grabber A/TX — better treadwear and noise. Where the Firestone Destination M/T2 is ahead, it is by less than 3 points.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
General Grabber A/TX scores 70 vs 56 on treadwear.
Pick tire B
You want a quieter cabin
General Grabber A/TX scores 64 vs 59 on noise.
Tire A · Firestone Destination M/T2
Tire B · General Grabber A/TX
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Destination M/T2 or Grabber A/TX?
Which is better in the wet, Destination M/T2 or Grabber A/TX?
Neither, by our numbers: 72 vs 74 on the wet score, within 3 points.
Which grips better on dry roads, Destination M/T2 or Grabber A/TX?
Neither, by our numbers: 68 vs 69 on the dry score, within 3 points.
Which is better in snow, Destination M/T2 or Grabber A/TX?
Neither, by our numbers: 71 vs 69 on the snow score, within 3 points.
Which is quieter, Destination M/T2 or Grabber A/TX?
General Grabber A/TX, 64 vs 59 on our noise score.
Which is more comfortable, Destination M/T2 or Grabber A/TX?
Neither, by our numbers: 63 vs 63 on the comfort score, within 3 points.
Which lasts longer, Destination M/T2 or Grabber A/TX?
General Grabber A/TX, 70 vs 56 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology