tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Firestone Destination M/T2 vs General Grabber A/TX — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 39 + 373 owner reviews. How we score

Grabber A/TX leads, 69–66 Narrow edge

Check price on Amazon · Grabber A/TX or Destination M/T2 on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

General Grabber A/TX
Tire BGeneral

Grabber A/TX

All-Terrain tire

± 7

Tests – · none yet Owners 68 · 373 reviews

“275/60r20 General Grabber A/Tx Just thought I'd share what my truck looks like with a slightly larger tire size in case anyone wondered. No level, just stock. Good looking tires in my opinion.”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 67

    Dry

    Grabber A/TX +1
    68
    Why this score
    SourceDestination M/T2Grabber A/TX
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online6768

    Destination M/T2: 60% × 67.5 (est.) + 40% × 66.9 = 67

    Grabber A/TX: 60% × 67.9 (est.) + 40% × 67.9 = 68

    No road tests of dry for Destination M/T2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

    No road tests of dry for Grabber A/TX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 71

    Wet

    Grabber A/TX +2
    73
    Why this score
    SourceDestination M/T2Grabber A/TX
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 71 (est.)≈ 73 (est.)
    Reviews found online7174

    Destination M/T2: 60% × 71.1 (est.) + 40% × 71.4 = 71

    Grabber A/TX: 60% × 72.7 (est.) + 40% × 74.2 = 73

    No road tests of wet for Destination M/T2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for Grabber A/TX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 71

    Snow

    Destination M/T2 +3
    68
    Why this score
    SourceDestination M/T2Grabber A/TX
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 71 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online7167

    Destination M/T2: 60% × 70.5 (est.) + 40% × 70.6 = 71

    Grabber A/TX: 60% × 69.3 (est.) + 40% × 66.7 = 68

    No road tests of snow for Destination M/T2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

    No road tests of snow for Grabber A/TX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 62

    Comfort

    Destination M/T2 +1
    61
    Why this score
    SourceDestination M/T2Grabber A/TX
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online5958

    Destination M/T2: 40% × 66.7 (est.) + 60% × 58.7 = 62

    Grabber A/TX: 40% × 66.6 (est.) + 60% × 58.1 = 61

    No road tests of comfort for Destination M/T2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.21).

    No road tests of comfort for Grabber A/TX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.21).

  5. 59

    Noise

    Grabber A/TX +5
    64
    Why this score
    SourceDestination M/T2Grabber A/TX
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online4759

    Destination M/T2: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 47 = 59

    Grabber A/TX: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 59.4 = 64

    No road tests of noise for Destination M/T2 or Grabber A/TX. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 56

    Treadwear

    Grabber A/TX +14
    70
    Why this score
    SourceDestination M/T2Grabber A/TX
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 61 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online5072

    Destination M/T2: 60% × 60.7 (est.) + 40% × 50.1 = 56

    Grabber A/TX: 60% × 68.6 (est.) + 40% × 72.4 = 70

    No road tests of treadwear for Destination M/T2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

    No road tests of treadwear for Grabber A/TX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. –

    Handling (owners)

    No comparison
    59
    Why this score
    SourceDestination M/T2Grabber A/TX
    Reviews found online–59
Scores at a glance
CategoryFirestone Destination M/T2General Grabber A/TX
Relative Score 66 69
Dry 67 68
Wet 71 73
Snow 71 68
Comfort 62 61
Noise 59 64
Treadwear 56 70
Handling (owners) – 59

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

Destination M/T2

± 7

Grabber A/TX

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Destination M/T2

Pros

  • Unexpectedly low road noise for a mud-terrain tire
  • Exceptional off-road traction in mud, sand, and deep snow
  • Good highway manners and stable handling

Cons

  • Can develop cupping and increased noise if maintenance/rotations are neglected
  • Slight initial slip on road paint during the first few thousand miles
  • Mixed reports on longevity when heavily utilized for towing or rough gravel service
All owner themes in the Destination M/T2 review

Tire B Grabber A/TX

Pros

  • Exceptional winter and snow traction (3-peak mountain snowflake rated)
  • Impressively low road noise and high ride comfort for an aggressive all-terrain tire
  • Strong wet and dry road grip with confident handling

Cons

  • Noticeable decrease in fuel economy (MPG drop)
  • Tread tends to pick up and throw small stones and pebbles
  • Mixed reviews on long-term treadwear and longevity
All owner themes in the Grabber A/TX review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Firestone Destination M/T2

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Tire B

General Grabber A/TX

Positive

Community sentiment toward the General Grabber A/TX is largely positive, with owners frequently praising its winter traction on snow and ice as well as its quiet highway ride. Buyers appreciate its availability in lighter standard load ratings and competitive pricing compared to rivals like the BFG KO2. Minor drawbacks cited include fuel economy loss with heavier LT versions and a tendency for the tread to pick up and fling gravel rocks.

r/4Runner ·16 upvotes ·2020-10-11

“Swapped OEM 265/65R17 for Grabber A/Tx 265/70R17 On 2018 Wheels”
jeepforum.com ·2021-10-12

“Thanks Coldcase, you always come through. Im thinking of going for the General Grabber A/Tx, 1 vehicle from the link you posted is using them and even a bigger size at 285 without any issue, difference is they have the altitude package instead of Overland. Do you think ill be fine?”
r/Crosstrek ·12 upvotes ·2025-04-12

“Tire recommendations! Current 215/75R-15 GENERAL GRABBER A/TX SL I am going to need new tires and I am wondering if I should buy a different tire than what I currently have. Overall these tires have been great and drive pretty well in the snow in VT and NY. Drive NJ roads year round aswell. Any recommendations?! Much appreciate any advice!! Read more”
Top themes
#Snow and ice traction#Highway road noise#Standard load availability#Fuel economy impact#Rock retention and throwing#Ride quality and PSI

Based on 37 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Firestone Destination M/T2 B · General Grabber A/TX
CategoryMud-Terrain tireAll-Terrain tire
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4SUV and 4x4
Sizes available1844
Rim diameters15″ – 20″15″ – 22″
Tread depth19/32″14 - 17/32″
UTQG—640 A A - B
SidewallOutlined White LetteringBlack Side Wall - Raised White Lettering
Max pressure50 psi35 - 80 psi
Sizes in common1414

Which one should you actually buy?

Firestone Destination M/T2

General Grabber A/TX

Narrow edge: General Grabber A/TX — better treadwear and noise. Pick the Firestone Destination M/T2 if snow matters most to you.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

General Grabber A/TX scores 70 vs 56 on treadwear.

Pick tire B You want a quieter cabin

General Grabber A/TX scores 64 vs 59 on noise.

Pick tire A You drive through snowy winters

Firestone Destination M/T2 scores 71 vs 68 on snow.

Tire A · Firestone Destination M/T2
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · General Grabber A/TX
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Destination M/T2 or Grabber A/TX?

Which is better in the wet, Destination M/T2 or Grabber A/TX?

Neither, by our numbers: 71 vs 73 on the wet score, within 3 points.

Which grips better on dry roads, Destination M/T2 or Grabber A/TX?

Neither, by our numbers: 67 vs 68 on the dry score, within 3 points.

Which is better in snow, Destination M/T2 or Grabber A/TX?

Firestone Destination M/T2, 71 vs 68 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, Destination M/T2 or Grabber A/TX?

General Grabber A/TX, 64 vs 59 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, Destination M/T2 or Grabber A/TX?

Neither, by our numbers: 62 vs 61 on the comfort score, within 3 points.

Which lasts longer, Destination M/T2 or Grabber A/TX?

General Grabber A/TX, 70 vs 56 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology