Tests – · none yet Owners 63 · 39 reviews
Head-to-head
Updated
Firestone Destination M/T2 vs BFGoodrich Mud-Terrain T/A KM3 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 39 + 123 owner reviews. How we score
Mud-Terrain T/A KM3 leads, 69–66 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 69 · 123 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
67
Dry
Mud-Terrain T/A KM3 +168Why this score
Source Destination M/T2 Mud-Terrain T/A KM3 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 67 68 Destination M/T2: 60% × 67.5 (est.) + 40% × 66.9 = 67
Mud-Terrain T/A KM3: 60% × 68.1 (est.) + 40% × 68.4 = 68
No road tests of dry for Destination M/T2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
No road tests of dry for Mud-Terrain T/A KM3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
71
Wet
Mud-Terrain T/A KM3 +273Why this score
Source Destination M/T2 Mud-Terrain T/A KM3 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 71 (est.) ≈ 73 (est.) Reviews found online 71 74 Destination M/T2: 60% × 71.1 (est.) + 40% × 71.4 = 71
Mud-Terrain T/A KM3: 60% × 72.7 (est.) + 40% × 74.3 = 73
No road tests of wet for Destination M/T2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for Mud-Terrain T/A KM3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
71
Snow
Destination M/T2 +368Why this score
Source Destination M/T2 Mud-Terrain T/A KM3 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 71 (est.) ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online 71 67 Destination M/T2: 60% × 70.5 (est.) + 40% × 70.6 = 71
Mud-Terrain T/A KM3: 60% × 69.3 (est.) + 40% × 66.6 = 68
No road tests of snow for Destination M/T2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
No road tests of snow for Mud-Terrain T/A KM3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
62
Comfort
Mud-Terrain T/A KM3 +466Why this score
Source Destination M/T2 Mud-Terrain T/A KM3 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 59 65 Destination M/T2: 40% × 66.7 (est.) + 60% × 58.7 = 62
Mud-Terrain T/A KM3: 40% × 68 (est.) + 60% × 64.9 = 66
No road tests of comfort for Destination M/T2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.21).
No road tests of comfort for Mud-Terrain T/A KM3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.21).
-
59
Noise
Mud-Terrain T/A KM3 +665Why this score
Source Destination M/T2 Mud-Terrain T/A KM3 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 47 63 Destination M/T2: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 47 = 59
Mud-Terrain T/A KM3: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 63.1 = 65
No road tests of noise for Destination M/T2 or Mud-Terrain T/A KM3. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
56
Treadwear
Mud-Terrain T/A KM3 +1369Why this score
Source Destination M/T2 Mud-Terrain T/A KM3 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 61 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 50 70 Destination M/T2: 60% × 60.7 (est.) + 40% × 50.1 = 56
Mud-Terrain T/A KM3: 60% × 67.7 (est.) + 40% × 69.8 = 69
No road tests of treadwear for Destination M/T2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for Mud-Terrain T/A KM3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
Scores at a glance
| Category | Firestone Destination M/T2 | BFGoodrich Mud-Terrain T/A KM3 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 66 | 69 |
| Dry | 67 | 68 |
| Wet | 71 | 73 |
| Snow | 71 | 68 |
| Comfort | 62 | 66 |
| Noise | 59 | 65 |
| Treadwear | 56 | 69 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
66
/ 100
Destination M/T2
69
/ 100
Mud-Terrain T/A KM3
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Destination M/T2
Pros
- Unexpectedly low road noise for a mud-terrain tire
- Exceptional off-road traction in mud, sand, and deep snow
- Good highway manners and stable handling
Cons
- Can develop cupping and increased noise if maintenance/rotations are neglected
- Slight initial slip on road paint during the first few thousand miles
- Mixed reports on longevity when heavily utilized for towing or rough gravel service
Tire B Mud-Terrain T/A KM3
Pros
- Outstanding off-road and mud traction
- Surprisingly quiet and comfortable on the highway for a mud-terrain tire
- Impressive tread wear and longevity
Cons
- Do not perform quite as well as dedicated road tires during on-road driving
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Firestone Destination M/T2 | B · BFGoodrich Mud-Terrain T/A KM3 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Mud-Terrain tire | Mud-Terrain tire |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 18 | 27 |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 20″ | 16″ – 20″ |
| Tread depth | 19/32″ | 18/32″ |
| Sidewall | Outlined White Lettering | Raised Black Lettering |
| Max pressure | 50 psi | 45 - 80 psi |
| Sizes in common | 14 | 14 |
Which one should you actually buy?
66
/ 100
Firestone Destination M/T2
69
/ 100
BFGoodrich Mud-Terrain T/A KM3
Narrow edge: BFGoodrich Mud-Terrain T/A KM3 — better treadwear, noise and comfort. Pick the Firestone Destination M/T2 if snow matters most to you.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
BFGoodrich Mud-Terrain T/A KM3 scores 69 vs 56 on treadwear.
Pick tire B
You want a quieter cabin
BFGoodrich Mud-Terrain T/A KM3 scores 65 vs 59 on noise.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
BFGoodrich Mud-Terrain T/A KM3 scores 66 vs 62 on comfort.
Pick tire A
You drive through snowy winters
Firestone Destination M/T2 scores 71 vs 68 on snow.
Tire A · Firestone Destination M/T2
Tire B · BFGoodrich Mud-Terrain T/A KM3
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Destination M/T2 or Mud-Terrain T/A KM3?
Which is better in the wet, Destination M/T2 or Mud-Terrain T/A KM3?
Neither, by our numbers: 71 vs 73 on the wet score, within 3 points.
Which grips better on dry roads, Destination M/T2 or Mud-Terrain T/A KM3?
Neither, by our numbers: 67 vs 68 on the dry score, within 3 points.
Which is better in snow, Destination M/T2 or Mud-Terrain T/A KM3?
Firestone Destination M/T2, 71 vs 68 on our snow score.
Which is quieter, Destination M/T2 or Mud-Terrain T/A KM3?
BFGoodrich Mud-Terrain T/A KM3, 65 vs 59 on our noise score.
Which is more comfortable, Destination M/T2 or Mud-Terrain T/A KM3?
BFGoodrich Mud-Terrain T/A KM3, 66 vs 62 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Destination M/T2 or Mud-Terrain T/A KM3?
BFGoodrich Mud-Terrain T/A KM3, 69 vs 56 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology