Tests – · none yet Owners 63 · 39 reviews
Firestone Destination M/T2 vs Pirelli Scorpion All Terrain Plus — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 1 road tests and 39 + 94 owner reviews. How we score
Scorpion All Terrain Plus is ahead, 72–66
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · 1 test Owners 74 · 94 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
67
Dry
Scorpion All Terrain Plus +471Why this score
Source Destination M/T2 Scorpion All Terrain Plus Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 67 73 Destination M/T2: 60% × 67.5 (est.) + 40% × 66.9 = 67
Scorpion All Terrain Plus: 60% × 69.9 (est.) + 40% × 72.6 = 71
No road tests of dry for Destination M/T2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
No road tests of dry for Scorpion All Terrain Plus. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
71
Wet
Scorpion All Terrain Plus +778Why this score
Source Destination M/T2 Scorpion All Terrain Plus Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 71 (est.) ≈ 76 (est.) Reviews found online 71 81 Destination M/T2: 60% × 71.1 (est.) + 40% × 71.4 = 71
Scorpion All Terrain Plus: 60% × 76.2 (est.) + 40% × 80.8 = 78
No road tests of wet for Destination M/T2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for Scorpion All Terrain Plus. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
71
Snow
Scorpion All Terrain Plus +273Why this score
Source Destination M/T2 Scorpion All Terrain Plus Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 71 (est.) ≈ 72 (est.) Reviews found online 71 76 Destination M/T2: 60% × 70.5 (est.) + 40% × 70.6 = 71
Scorpion All Terrain Plus: 60% × 72.1 (est.) + 40% × 75.5 = 73
No road tests of snow for Destination M/T2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
No road tests of snow for Scorpion All Terrain Plus. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
62
Comfort
Scorpion All Terrain Plus +971Why this score
Source Destination M/T2 Scorpion All Terrain Plus Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online 59 72 Destination M/T2: 40% × 66.7 (est.) + 60% × 58.7 = 62
Scorpion All Terrain Plus: 40% × 69.2 (est.) + 60% × 71.6 = 71
No road tests of comfort for Destination M/T2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for Scorpion All Terrain Plus. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
59
Noise
Scorpion All Terrain Plus +867Why this score
Source Destination M/T2 Scorpion All Terrain Plus Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 47 67 Destination M/T2: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 47.3 = 59
Scorpion All Terrain Plus: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 66.6 = 67
No road tests of noise for Destination M/T2 or Scorpion All Terrain Plus. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
56
Treadwear
Scorpion All Terrain Plus +1268Why this score
Source Destination M/T2 Scorpion All Terrain Plus Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 61 (est.) 67 Reviews found online 50 70 Destination M/T2: 60% × 60.6 (est.) + 40% × 50.1 = 56
Scorpion All Terrain Plus: 60% × 66.9 + 40% × 69.9 = 68
No road tests of treadwear for Destination M/T2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
–
Handling (owners)
No comparison75Why this score
Source Destination M/T2 Scorpion All Terrain Plus Reviews found online – 75
Scores at a glance
| Category | Firestone Destination M/T2 | Pirelli Scorpion All Terrain Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 66 | 72 |
| Dry | 67 | 71 |
| Wet | 71 | 78 |
| Snow | 71 | 73 |
| Comfort | 62 | 71 |
| Noise | 59 | 67 |
| Treadwear | 56 | 68 |
| Handling (owners) | – | 75 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Destination M/T2
Scorpion All Terrain Plus
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Destination M/T2
Pros
- Unexpectedly low road noise for a mud-terrain tire
- Exceptional off-road traction in mud, sand, and deep snow
- Good highway manners and stable handling
Cons
- Can develop cupping and increased noise if maintenance/rotations are neglected
- Slight initial slip on road paint during the first few thousand miles
- Mixed reports on longevity when heavily utilized for towing or rough gravel service
Tire B Scorpion All Terrain Plus
Pros
- Exceptional wet, mud, and winter/snow traction (3-peak mountain snowflake certified)
- Surprisingly quiet and smooth ride on the highway compared to aggressive competitors
- Aggressive, attractive sidewall and tread styling that enhances vehicle appearance
Cons
- Some users reported persistent balancing issues or vibrations at highway speeds
- A few drivers noted increased road noise or uneven shoulder wear as the tires aged
- Minor reduction in fuel economy reported by some truck and SUV owners
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Firestone Destination M/T2 | B · Pirelli Scorpion All Terrain Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Mud-Terrain tire | All-Terrain tire |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 18 | 29 |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 20″ | 16″ – 20″ |
| Tread depth | 19/32″ | 12 - 16/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 640 A B |
| Treadwear warranty | — | 50,000 mi |
| Sidewall | Outlined White Lettering | Black Side Wall - Raised White Lettering |
| Max pressure | 50 psi | 44 - 80 psi |
| Sizes in common | 8 | 8 |
Which one should you actually buy?
Firestone Destination M/T2
Pirelli Scorpion All Terrain Plus
Winner: Pirelli Scorpion All Terrain Plus — better treadwear, comfort and noise. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pirelli Scorpion All Terrain Plus scores 68 vs 56 on treadwear.
Pirelli Scorpion All Terrain Plus scores 71 vs 62 on comfort.
Pirelli Scorpion All Terrain Plus scores 67 vs 59 on noise.
Pirelli Scorpion All Terrain Plus scores 78 vs 71 on wet.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Destination M/T2 or Scorpion All Terrain Plus?
Which is better in the wet, Destination M/T2 or Scorpion All Terrain Plus?
Pirelli Scorpion All Terrain Plus, 78 vs 71 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Destination M/T2 or Scorpion All Terrain Plus?
Pirelli Scorpion All Terrain Plus, 71 vs 67 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, Destination M/T2 or Scorpion All Terrain Plus?
Neither, by our numbers: 71 vs 73 on the snow score, within 3 points.
Which is quieter, Destination M/T2 or Scorpion All Terrain Plus?
Pirelli Scorpion All Terrain Plus, 67 vs 59 on our noise score.
Which is more comfortable, Destination M/T2 or Scorpion All Terrain Plus?
Pirelli Scorpion All Terrain Plus, 71 vs 62 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Destination M/T2 or Scorpion All Terrain Plus?
Pirelli Scorpion All Terrain Plus, 68 vs 56 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology