tirewheelguide

Hankook Dynapro M/T looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Hankook Dynapro M/T vs Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 5 + 67 owner reviews. How we score

Dynapro HP2 RA33 is ahead, 74–66

Check price on Amazon · Dynapro HP2 RA33 or Dynapro M/T on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Hankook Dynapro M/T
Tire AHankook

Dynapro M/T

Mud-Terrain tire

± 8Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 65 · 5 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 66

    Dry

    Dynapro HP2 RA33 +8
    74
    Why this score
    SourceDynapro M/TDynapro HP2 RA33
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 72 (est.)
    Reviews found online6477

    Dynapro M/T: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 64.3 = 66

    Dynapro HP2 RA33: 60% × 71.6 (est.) + 40% × 76.8 = 74

    No road tests of dry for Dynapro M/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

    No road tests of dry for Dynapro HP2 RA33. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 68

    Wet

    Dynapro HP2 RA33 +9
    77
    Why this score
    SourceDynapro M/TDynapro HP2 RA33
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 76 (est.)
    Reviews found online6680

    Dynapro M/T: 60% × 68.4 (est.) + 40% × 66.4 = 68

    Dynapro HP2 RA33: 60% × 75.7 (est.) + 40% × 79.8 = 77

    No road tests of wet for Dynapro M/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for Dynapro HP2 RA33. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 69

    Snow

    Dynapro M/T +1
    68
    Why this score
    SourceDynapro M/TDynapro HP2 RA33
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 70 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online6867

    Dynapro M/T: 60% × 69.8 (est.) + 40% × 68.3 = 69

    Dynapro HP2 RA33: 60% × 69.3 (est.) + 40% × 66.7 = 68

    No road tests of snow for Dynapro M/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

    No road tests of snow for Dynapro HP2 RA33. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 58

    Comfort

    Dynapro HP2 RA33 +17
    75
    Why this score
    SourceDynapro M/TDynapro HP2 RA33
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online5377

    Dynapro M/T: 40% × 65.5 (est.) + 60% × 53.2 = 58

    Dynapro HP2 RA33: 40% × 70.4 (est.) + 60% × 77.3 = 75

    No road tests of comfort for Dynapro M/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

    No road tests of comfort for Dynapro HP2 RA33. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  5. –

    Noise

    No comparison
    70
    Why this score
    SourceDynapro M/TDynapro HP2 RA33
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online–74

    Dynapro HP2 RA33: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 74.4 = 70

    No road tests of noise for Dynapro HP2 RA33. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 66

    Treadwear

    Dynapro HP2 RA33 +7
    73
    Why this score
    SourceDynapro M/TDynapro HP2 RA33
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online6677

    Dynapro M/T: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 66.2 = 66

    Dynapro HP2 RA33: 60% × 70.2 (est.) + 40% × 76.7 = 73

    No road tests of treadwear for Dynapro M/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

    No road tests of treadwear for Dynapro HP2 RA33. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 61

    Handling (owners)

    Dynapro HP2 RA33 +13
    74
    Why this score
    SourceDynapro M/TDynapro HP2 RA33
    Reviews found online6174
Scores at a glance
CategoryHankook Dynapro M/THankook Dynapro HP2 RA33
Relative Score 66 74
Dry 66 74
Wet 68 77
Snow 69 68
Comfort 58 75
Noise – 70
Treadwear 66 73
Handling (owners) 61 74

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

Dynapro M/T

± 7

Dynapro HP2 RA33

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

DisciplineCategoryDynapro M/TDynapro HP2 RA33ΔHead-to-head
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Overall Ranking Overall #5/10 2016 All Terrain and Off Road MT Tyre Test #11/15 2017 ADAC SUV Summer Tyre Test – Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Dynapro M/T

Pros

  • Exceptional tread life and overall mileage considering heavy use
  • Surprisingly low road noise for a mud-terrain tire
  • Strong dry and off-road traction, often reducing the need for 4WD

Cons

  • Severe loss of wet traction and dangerous slip/understeer tendencies as the rubber compound hardens over time
  • Prone to slow punctures on the running surface under heavy loads
  • Develops uneven wear patterns over extended high-mileage use
All owner themes in the Dynapro M/T review

Tire B Dynapro HP2 RA33

Pros

  • Exceptional value and cost-effectiveness compared to premium brands like Michelin
  • Quiet, smooth, and comfortable ride quality
  • Strong dry and wet traction under normal driving conditions

Cons

  • Occasional road noise or humming sound at higher speeds or on concrete surfaces
  • Potential for faster or average tread wear depending on driving habits and vehicle type
  • Some users reported sketchy wet cornering grip or sliding on roundabouts
All owner themes in the Dynapro HP2 RA33 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Hankook Dynapro M/T B · Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33
CategoryMud-Terrain tireSummer
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4SUV and 4x4
Sizes available—49
Rim diameters—15″ – 22″
Treadwear warranty—65,000 mi

Which one should you actually buy?

Hankook Dynapro M/T

Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33

Winner: Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33 — better comfort, handling and wet. Where the Hankook Dynapro M/T is ahead, it is by less than 3 points. Hankook Dynapro M/T rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 5 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33 scores 75 vs 58 on comfort.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33 scores 74 vs 61 on handling.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33 scores 77 vs 68 on wet.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33 scores 74 vs 66 on dry.

Tire A · Hankook Dynapro M/T
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Dynapro M/T or Dynapro HP2 RA33?

Which is better in the wet, Dynapro M/T or Dynapro HP2 RA33?

Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33, 77 vs 68 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Dynapro M/T or Dynapro HP2 RA33?

Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33, 74 vs 66 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, Dynapro M/T or Dynapro HP2 RA33?

Neither, by our numbers: 69 vs 68 on the snow score, within 3 points.

Which is more comfortable, Dynapro M/T or Dynapro HP2 RA33?

Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33, 75 vs 58 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Dynapro M/T or Dynapro HP2 RA33?

Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33, 73 vs 66 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology