Tests – · none yet Owners 34 · 278 reviews
“Tesla model y tire HP71 crugen on tirerack is offering $80 rebate per tire.”
Head-to-head
Updated
Kumho Crugen HP71 vs Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 278 + 67 owner reviews. How we score
Dynapro HP2 RA33 is ahead, 74–47
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 76 · 67 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
44
Dry
Dynapro HP2 RA33 +3074Why this score
Source Crugen HP71 Dynapro HP2 RA33 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 52 (est.) ≈ 72 (est.) Reviews found online 31 77 Crugen HP71: 60% × 52.5 (est.) + 40% × 30.7 = 44
Dynapro HP2 RA33: 60% × 71.7 (est.) + 40% × 76.9 = 74
No road tests of dry for Crugen HP71. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
No road tests of dry for Dynapro HP2 RA33. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
51
Wet
Dynapro HP2 RA33 +2677Why this score
Source Crugen HP71 Dynapro HP2 RA33 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 56 (est.) ≈ 76 (est.) Reviews found online 44 80 Crugen HP71: 60% × 56 (est.) + 40% × 43.9 = 51
Dynapro HP2 RA33: 60% × 75.8 (est.) + 40% × 79.9 = 77
No road tests of wet for Crugen HP71. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for Dynapro HP2 RA33. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
53
Snow
Dynapro HP2 RA33 +1568Why this score
Source Crugen HP71 Dynapro HP2 RA33 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 61 (est.) ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online 41 67 Crugen HP71: 60% × 61.2 (est.) + 40% × 41 = 53
Dynapro HP2 RA33: 60% × 69.4 (est.) + 40% × 66.9 = 68
No road tests of snow for Crugen HP71. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
No road tests of snow for Dynapro HP2 RA33. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
44
Comfort
Dynapro HP2 RA33 +3175Why this score
Source Crugen HP71 Dynapro HP2 RA33 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 61 (est.) ≈ 71 (est.) Reviews found online 32 77 Crugen HP71: 40% × 61.3 (est.) + 60% × 32.1 = 44
Dynapro HP2 RA33: 40% × 70.5 (est.) + 60% × 77.3 = 75
No road tests of comfort for Crugen HP71. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for Dynapro HP2 RA33. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
54
Noise
Dynapro HP2 RA33 +1670Why this score
Source Crugen HP71 Dynapro HP2 RA33 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 36 74 Crugen HP71: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 35.6 = 54
Dynapro HP2 RA33: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 74.3 = 70
No road tests of noise for Crugen HP71 or Dynapro HP2 RA33. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
37
Treadwear
Dynapro HP2 RA33 +3673Why this score
Source Crugen HP71 Dynapro HP2 RA33 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 49 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 18 77 Crugen HP71: 60% × 49.3 (est.) + 40% × 18.4 = 37
Dynapro HP2 RA33: 60% × 70.2 (est.) + 40% × 76.7 = 73
No road tests of treadwear for Crugen HP71. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for Dynapro HP2 RA33. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
51
Handling (owners)
Dynapro HP2 RA33 +2374Why this score
Source Crugen HP71 Dynapro HP2 RA33 Reviews found online 51 74
Scores at a glance
| Category | Kumho Crugen HP71 | Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 47 | 74 |
| Dry | 44 | 74 |
| Wet | 51 | 77 |
| Snow | 53 | 68 |
| Comfort | 44 | 75 |
| Noise | 54 | 70 |
| Treadwear | 37 | 73 |
| Handling (owners) | 51 | 74 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
47
/ 100
Crugen HP71
74
/ 100
Dynapro HP2 RA33
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | Crugen HP71 | Dynapro HP2 RA33 | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #8/9 2021 Teknikens Värld Summer Tire Test R18 | #11/15 2017 ADAC SUV Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Crugen HP71
Pros
- Strong value: frequently described as much cheaper than Michelin, Pirelli or Bridgestone alternatives while not feeling like a budget tire.
- Good wet and heavy-rain traction, with some reports of confident light-snow performance.
- Quiet, smooth ride reported by many owners, often as an improvement over the stock tires (Bridgestone Dueler, Pirelli, Hankook).
Cons
- Premature or uneven tread wear is the most common complaint, with reports of tires worn out at roughly 15,000 to 27,000 miles or within 1.5 years, far below the 65,000-mile rating.
- Road and highway noise, including howling that develops with mileage, reported by several owners.
- Vibration and difficulty keeping the tires balanced, in some cases even after repeated balancing and rotations.
Tire B Dynapro HP2 RA33
Pros
- Exceptional value and cost-effectiveness compared to premium brands like Michelin
- Quiet, smooth, and comfortable ride quality
- Strong dry and wet traction under normal driving conditions
Cons
- Occasional road noise or humming sound at higher speeds or on concrete surfaces
- Potential for faster or average tread wear depending on driving habits and vehicle type
- Some users reported sketchy wet cornering grip or sliding on roundabouts
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Tire A
Mixed
Kumho Crugen HP71
Community opinions on the Kumho Crugen HP71 (including EV variants) are generally mixed, primarily leaning on price and initial comfort versus longevity. Many users appreciate the affordable pricing, quiet/smooth ride, and good handling, but a significant number report faster-than-expected tread wear and occasional issues with foam lining separation or durability on heavier vehicles.
r/nissanpathfinder
·1 upvote ·2026-05-31
“2026 Pathfinder Tires: 255/60R18 Kumho Crugen HP71 vs 255/50R20 Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra I think I settled on a configuration that suits our needs but it comes with the upgraded 255/50R20 Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra tires/rims. The 20" wheels look great but I think the 18" Kumho's with the taller side will be better for the sometimes rough roads (potholes, large bumps, torn up city streets) we drive and for lighter towing. I highly doubt the dealer will exchange them for me but first I wanted to ask if I'm just overthinking this or should I try to trade down for the 18s. For reference I'm completely satisfied driving an outback with 225/60R18 Yokohama Avid GT (controlled, planted) and not happy with a highlander with 235/65R18 (too soft, uncontrolled). I get that these are different vehicles, suspensions, center of gravity, but hopefully it gives you a better idea. Thanks Edit: clarification on towing: fiberglass trailer like Scamp/Casita”
r/tires
·2026-10-14
“Kumho warranty I had these for a little under 18 months. The thread is still good, but the tires have these cracks. Do you guys think I can claim warranty from Kumho? These are Kumho Crugen HP71. Manufacturing date 01/24.”
r/AskAMechanic
·1 upvote ·2026-07-26
“I need a new tire, right? 215/55R18 Kumho Crugen HP71 tire showing cords on the outer sidewall. I need a new tire, right? Edit: I’m thinking about replacing just this one tire, 2023 CX-30 AWD. Tires were new Oct 2025 and have 7mm tread depth left. According to the spec sheet, this new tire would have 7.9mm of depth. Can I get away with one tire? Edit 2: Existing vs new tires would have ~1mm of difference in tread depth Read more”
Top themes
#Affordability and Value#Ride Comfort and Noise#Tread Wear and Longevity#EV Performance and Efficiency#Durability and Quality Issues
Based on 52 community posts
Tire B
Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Kumho Crugen HP71 | B · Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Ultra High Performance tires | Summer |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 63 | 49 |
| Rim diameters | 16″ – 22″ | 15″ – 22″ |
| Tread depth | 9.9/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 640 A A | — |
| Treadwear warranty | 65,000 mi | 65,000 mi |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | — |
| Max pressure | 51 psi | — |
| Sizes in common | 32 | 32 |
Which one should you actually buy?
47
/ 100
Kumho Crugen HP71
74
/ 100
Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33
Winner: Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33 — better treadwear, comfort and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33 scores 73 vs 37 on treadwear.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33 scores 75 vs 44 on comfort.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33 scores 74 vs 44 on dry.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33 scores 77 vs 51 on wet.
Tire A · Kumho Crugen HP71
Tire B · Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Crugen HP71 or Dynapro HP2 RA33?
Which is better in the wet, Crugen HP71 or Dynapro HP2 RA33?
Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33, 77 vs 51 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Crugen HP71 or Dynapro HP2 RA33?
Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33, 74 vs 44 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, Crugen HP71 or Dynapro HP2 RA33?
Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33, 68 vs 53 on our snow score.
Which is quieter, Crugen HP71 or Dynapro HP2 RA33?
Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33, 70 vs 54 on our noise score.
Which is more comfortable, Crugen HP71 or Dynapro HP2 RA33?
Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33, 75 vs 44 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Crugen HP71 or Dynapro HP2 RA33?
Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33, 73 vs 37 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology