Tests – · none yet Owners 59 · 8 reviews
Firestone F700 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Head-to-head
Updated
Firestone F700 vs Kumho Ecowing ES31 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 8 + 9,931 owner reviews. How we score
Too close to call: F700 62, Ecowing ES31 63.
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 62 · 9,931 reviews
“Certa vez, nos comentários de um vídeo sobre pneus no YouTube, vi a galera que trabalha com Uber falando bem do Ecowing ES31, relatando que tem ótima durabilidade. Resolvi arriscar e coloquei, são ótimos mesmo, já rodei 18 mil km e estão impecáveis ainda.”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
64
Dry
Level64Why this score
Source F700 Ecowing ES31 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 65 (est.) Reviews found online 62 62 F700: 60% × 65.6 (est.) + 40% × 62.3 = 64
Ecowing ES31: 60% × 65.5 (est.) + 40% × 61.9 = 64
No road tests of dry for F700. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
No road tests of dry for Ecowing ES31. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
61
Wet
Ecowing ES31 +263Why this score
Source F700 Ecowing ES31 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 63 (est.) ≈ 65 (est.) Reviews found online 57 60 F700: 60% × 63.3 (est.) + 40% × 57.1 = 61
Ecowing ES31: 60% × 64.9 (est.) + 40% × 60.1 = 63
No road tests of wet for F700. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for Ecowing ES31. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
59
Comfort
Ecowing ES31 +463Why this score
Source F700 Ecowing ES31 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 55 61 F700: 40% × 65.9 (est.) + 60% × 55.2 = 59
Ecowing ES31: 40% × 67.1 (est.) + 60% × 60.8 = 63
No road tests of comfort for F700. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for Ecowing ES31. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
61
Treadwear
Ecowing ES31 +566Why this score
Source F700 Ecowing ES31 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 63 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 57 65 F700: 60% × 63.2 (est.) + 40% × 57.2 = 61
Ecowing ES31: 60% × 65.9 (est.) + 40% × 64.9 = 66
No road tests of treadwear for F700. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for Ecowing ES31. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
60
Handling (owners)
F700 +555Why this score
Source F700 Ecowing ES31 Reviews found online 60 55
Scores at a glance
| Category | Firestone F700 | Kumho Ecowing ES31 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 62 | 63 |
| Dry | 64 | 64 |
| Wet | 61 | 63 |
| Comfort | 59 | 63 |
| Treadwear | 61 | 66 |
| Handling (owners) | 60 | 55 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
62
/ 100
F700
63
/ 100
Ecowing ES31
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A F700
Pros
- Reliable dry-weather traction
- Good steering feedback and handling characteristics
- Competitive tread life for some users
Cons
- Inconsistent wet-weather grip and braking performance
- High levels of road noise
- Prone to uneven or irregular tread wear patterns
Tire B Ecowing ES31
Pros
- Exceptional value and affordability compared to premium brand alternatives
- Low road noise and enhanced ride comfort over bumps and speed humps
- Improved fuel economy and reduced rolling resistance
Cons
- Polarizing wet weather performance, with some users reporting frightening losses of traction
- Soft sidewalls that can feel vague during quick lane changes or lead to vulnerability against curbs and potholes
- Occasional reports of accelerated or uneven tread wear on outer shoulders
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Tire A
Firestone F700
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Tire B
Mixed
Kumho Ecowing ES31
The Kumho Ecowing ES31 is generally viewed as an affordable, budget-friendly mid-range summer tire that offers good durability and dry grip, making it popular among commuters and rideshare drivers. However, opinions are mixed regarding its wet weather performance, with some users reporting poor wet grip while others find it acceptable for cautious, everyday driving.
r/carros
·3 upvotes ·2024-07-22
“Kumho ecowing es31 é o melhor custo benefício, tem classificação B de consumo e C de aderência, eu já tive pneu da Kumho e gostei da aderência e é um pneu macio pra conforto. Continental Power Contact 2 tbm é uma boa opção. Eu não recomendo xbri, farroad, ling long, speedmax, pois tem durabilidade baixa.”
r/ArAutos
·2 upvotes ·2025-04-04
“Tengo las kumho ecowing es31 y ninguna queja, siempre respondieron bien aunque la verdad manejo como un abuelo, solo una vez frene fuerte en la panamericana y nunca bloquearon, las volveria a poner en otro auto.”
r/TyreReviews
·2 upvotes ·2025-11-05
“The EU label is all over the place. But none have A-A-A as far as I can tell. Did not score good in wet in the test on the site. Wear rate on a Mazda 2 should be decent with almost anything. Why not look at all seasons? Sava All weather and Kumho Solus are closest to the ES31 in price.”
Top themes
#Cost effectiveness and value#Wet weather grip#Treadwear and durability#Budget tier limitations#Urban commuting suitability
Based on 12 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Firestone F700 | B · Kumho Ecowing ES31 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | — | 39 |
| Rim diameters | — | 13″ – 18″ |
| UTQG | 200 - 540 AA - B A - B | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
62
/ 100
Firestone F700
63
/ 100
Kumho Ecowing ES31
Too close to call: Firestone F700 and Kumho Ecowing ES31 are within 2 points overall. Kumho Ecowing ES31 is stronger on treadwear and comfort. Firestone F700 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 8 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Kumho Ecowing ES31 scores 66 vs 61 on treadwear.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Kumho Ecowing ES31 scores 63 vs 59 on comfort.
Tire A · Firestone F700
Tire B · Kumho Ecowing ES31
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
F700 or Ecowing ES31?
Which is better in the wet, F700 or Ecowing ES31?
Neither, by our numbers: 61 vs 63 on the wet score, within 3 points.
Which grips better on dry roads, F700 or Ecowing ES31?
Neither, by our numbers: 64 vs 64 on the dry score, within 3 points.
Which is more comfortable, F700 or Ecowing ES31?
Kumho Ecowing ES31, 63 vs 59 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, F700 or Ecowing ES31?
Kumho Ecowing ES31, 66 vs 61 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology