Tests – · none yet Owners 59 · 8 reviews
Firestone F700 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Head-to-head
Updated
Firestone F700 vs Kumho Ecsta PS71 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 14 road tests and 8 + 8,191 owner reviews. How we score
Ecsta PS71 is ahead, 73–62
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 68 · 14 tests Owners 69 · 8,191 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 18 in 2025 ADAC Summer Tyre Test (straight aquaplaning)
“Those are Kumho Ecsta PS71s, thread width is supposed to be 245mm, the actual one is hardly 235. How so?”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
64
Dry
Ecsta PS71 +1175Why this score
Source F700 Ecsta PS71 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 12 tests ≈ 66 (est.) 78 Reviews found online 62 72 F700: 60% × 65.6 (est.) + 40% × 62.3 = 64
Ecsta PS71: 60% × 77.6 + 40% × 71.7 = 75
No road tests of dry for F700. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
61
Wet
Ecsta PS71 +2485Why this score
Source F700 Ecsta PS71 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 13 tests ≈ 63 (est.) 92 Reviews found online 57 75 F700: 60% × 63.3 (est.) + 40% × 57.1 = 61
Ecsta PS71: 60% × 91.8 + 40% × 74.6 = 85
No road tests of wet for F700. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
59
Comfort
Ecsta PS71 +1069Why this score
Source F700 Ecsta PS71 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests ≈ 66 (est.) 75 Reviews found online 55 65 F700: 40% × 65.9 (est.) + 60% × 55.2 = 59
Ecsta PS71: 40% × 74.6 + 60% × 65.3 = 69
No road tests of comfort for F700. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
–
Noise
No comparison36Why this score
Source F700 Ecsta PS71 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 8 tests – 16 Reviews found online – ≈ 66 (est.) Ecsta PS71: 60% × 15.6 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 36
No owner ratings of noise for Ecsta PS71. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
-
61
Treadwear
F700 +952Why this score
Source F700 Ecsta PS71 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 6 tests ≈ 63 (est.) 46 Reviews found online 57 60 F700: 60% × 63.2 (est.) + 40% × 57.2 = 61
Ecsta PS71: 60% × 46 + 40% × 59.8 = 52
No road tests of treadwear for F700. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
60
Handling (owners)
Ecsta PS71 +1373Why this score
Source F700 Ecsta PS71 Reviews found online 60 73 -
–
Efficiency
No comparison48Why this score
Source F700 Ecsta PS71 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 7 tests – 48
Scores at a glance
| Category | Firestone F700 | Kumho Ecsta PS71 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 62 | 73 |
| Dry | 64 | 75 |
| Wet | 61 | 85 |
| Comfort | 59 | 69 |
| Noise | – | 36 |
| Treadwear | 61 | 52 |
| Handling (owners) | 60 | 73 |
| Efficiency | – | 48 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Recomputed
Headline score
62
/ 100
F700
73
/ 100
Ecsta PS71
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A F700
Pros
- Reliable dry-weather traction
- Good steering feedback and handling characteristics
- Competitive tread life for some users
Cons
- Inconsistent wet-weather grip and braking performance
- High levels of road noise
- Prone to uneven or irregular tread wear patterns
Tire B Ecsta PS71
Pros
- Outstanding wet weather grip and aquaplaning resistance
- High value for money compared to tier-one premium brands
- Predictable handling and solid cornering stability in both dry and wet conditions
Cons
- Noticeable road noise or droning at motorway speeds on certain vehicles
- Occasional reports of balancing difficulties or out-of-round/egg-shaped tires
- Softer sidewalls can lead to slightly vague steering response around center or tread block movement
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Tire A
Firestone F700
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Tire B
Positive
Kumho Ecsta PS71
Community members generally view the Kumho Ecsta PS71 as a capable and reliable mid-range ultra-high performance tire offering solid grip and value for money compared to premium alternatives. While perceived as good once warmed up, some drivers note that it does not quite reach the ultimate grip level of top-tier brands and question its tread wear longevity.
z4-forum.com
·2023-01-29
“Steve; have a look at Kuhmo Ecsta PS71s. I just fitted a set on my new wheels for my 440i. Weapon of choice for the 'non tyre snob' IMHO. Much cheaper than the 'big' brands, heat up quickly and they also look really nice (for a black round tyre). Can't comment on noise, as the exhaust on mine is so noisy I can't hear the radio, let alone tyres!”
r/tires
·5 upvotes ·2022-10-17
“Those are Kumho Ecsta PS71s, thread width is supposed to be 245mm, the actual one is hardly 235. How so?”
bimmerforums.co.uk
·1 upvote ·2024-05-05
“On Blackcircles all the 245/40 R19 ditch finders cost around £100 and have a poor wet grip & all the decent mid range cost around £170 and have A rated wet grip. Would you risk it for £240? I know I wouldn't. The cheapest A wet rated is a Kuhmo Ecsta PS71 at £136 if you really want to keep the cost down. If you want a relatively soft comfortable tyre then a Hankook S1 Evo 3 is an excellent choice.”
Top themes
#value for money#wet and dry grip#tire wear longevity#sporty handling performance#warm up temperature behavior#mid-range alternative comparison
Based on 23 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Firestone F700 | B · Kumho Ecsta PS71 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | — | 133 |
| Rim diameters | — | 16″ – 22″ |
| UTQG | 200 - 540 AA - B A - B | — |
| Sidewall | — | Blackwall |
Which one should you actually buy?
62
/ 100
Firestone F700
73
/ 100
Kumho Ecsta PS71
Winner: Kumho Ecsta PS71 — better wet, handling and dry. Pick the Firestone F700 if treadwear matters most to you. Firestone F700 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 8 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Kumho Ecsta PS71 scores 85 vs 61 on wet.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Kumho Ecsta PS71 scores 73 vs 60 on handling.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Kumho Ecsta PS71 scores 75 vs 64 on dry.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Kumho Ecsta PS71 scores 69 vs 59 on comfort.
Tire A · Firestone F700
Tire B · Kumho Ecsta PS71
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
F700 or Ecsta PS71?
Which is better in the wet, F700 or Ecsta PS71?
Kumho Ecsta PS71, 85 vs 61 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, F700 or Ecsta PS71?
Kumho Ecsta PS71, 75 vs 64 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, F700 or Ecsta PS71?
Kumho Ecsta PS71, 69 vs 59 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, F700 or Ecsta PS71?
Firestone F700, 61 vs 52 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology