Tests – · none yet Owners 73 · 5 reviews
Firestone Firehawk 900 vs Laufenn I FIT — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.
Firehawk 900 is ahead, 71–49
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
69
Dry
Firehawk 900 +1950Why this score
Source Firehawk 900 I FIT Reviews found online 70 40 -
73
Wet
Firehawk 900 +3142Why this score
Source Firehawk 900 I FIT Professional tests (TWG score) – 49 Reviews found online 74 33 -
–
Snow
No comparison64Why this score
Source Firehawk 900 I FIT Reviews found online – 60 -
71
Comfort
Firehawk 900 +962Why this score
Source Firehawk 900 I FIT Reviews found online 74 55 -
69
Treadwear
Firehawk 900 +1158Why this score
Source Firehawk 900 I FIT Reviews found online 72 53 -
76
Handling
Firehawk 900 +3838Why this score
Source Firehawk 900 I FIT Reviews found online 76 38
Scores at a glance
| Category | Firestone Firehawk 900 | Laufenn I FIT |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 71 | 49 |
| Dry | 69 | 50 |
| Wet | 73 | 42 |
| Snow | – | 64 |
| Comfort | 71 | 62 |
| Treadwear | 69 | 58 |
| Handling | 76 | 38 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neither tire has a score here yet, so this weight changes nothing.
Firehawk 900
I FIT
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Firehawk 900
Pros
- Reliable wet and dry traction
- Strong durability and impact resistance against potholes
- High level of ride comfort and bump absorption
Cons
- Noticeable road noise, especially at lower speeds
- Run-flat variants may be unsuitable for certain vehicle suspension setups
- Dry grip performance can degrade noticeably as the tire ages
Tire B I FIT
Pros
- Acceptable traction in snow and ice conditions
- Comfortable and quiet ride quality when new
- Affordable budget-oriented pricing as a Hankook sub-brand
Cons
- Catastrophically poor grip and high risk of aquaplaning on wet and cold roads
- Sudden loss of traction without warning, inspiring low confidence
- Rapid performance degradation after the first or second season
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Firestone Firehawk 900 | B · Laufenn I FIT |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Winter |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | — | 4 |
| Rim diameters | — | 14″ – 18″ |
Which one should you actually buy?
Firestone Firehawk 900
Laufenn I FIT
Winner: Firestone Firehawk 900 — better handling, wet and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Firestone Firehawk 900 scores 76 vs 38 on handling.
Firestone Firehawk 900 scores 73 vs 42 on wet.
Firestone Firehawk 900 scores 69 vs 50 on dry.
Firestone Firehawk 900 scores 69 vs 58 on treadwear.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.