Tests – · none yet Owners 73 · 5 reviews
Head-to-head
Updated
Firestone Firehawk 900 vs Michelin Energy — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 5 + 42 owner reviews. How we score
Firehawk 900 is ahead, 71–60
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
69
Dry
Firehawk 900 +1455Why this score
Source Firehawk 900 Energy Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 60 (est.) Reviews found online 70 48 Firehawk 900: 60% × 68.8 (est.) + 40% × 70.4 = 69
Energy: 60% × 60 (est.) + 40% × 48.4 = 55
No road tests of dry for Firehawk 900. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
No road tests of dry for Energy. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
-
73
Wet
Firehawk 900 +1261Why this score
Source Firehawk 900 Energy Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 72 (est.) ≈ 63 (est.) Reviews found online 74 57 Firehawk 900: 60% × 72.3 (est.) + 40% × 74.2 = 73
Energy: 60% × 62.9 (est.) + 40% × 57.4 = 61
No road tests of wet for Firehawk 900. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
No road tests of wet for Energy. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
-
71
Comfort
Firehawk 900 +665Why this score
Source Firehawk 900 Energy Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 70 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 74 60 Firehawk 900: 60% × 69.9 (est.) + 40% × 73.7 = 71
Energy: 60% × 67.6 (est.) + 40% × 60.2 = 65
No road tests of comfort for Firehawk 900 or Energy. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
69
Treadwear
Firehawk 900 +267Why this score
Source Firehawk 900 Energy Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 72 67 Firehawk 900: 60% × 67.6 (est.) + 40% × 72 = 69
Energy: 60% × 66.1 (est.) + 40% × 67.3 = 67
No road tests of treadwear for Firehawk 900. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
No road tests of treadwear for Energy. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
-
76
Handling (owners)
Firehawk 900 +2551Why this score
Source Firehawk 900 Energy Reviews found online 76 51
Scores at a glance
| Category | Firestone Firehawk 900 | Michelin Energy |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 71 | 60 |
| Dry | 69 | 55 |
| Wet | 73 | 61 |
| Comfort | 71 | 65 |
| Treadwear | 69 | 67 |
| Handling (owners) | 76 | 51 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
71
/ 100
Firehawk 900
60
/ 100
Energy
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Firehawk 900
Pros
- Reliable wet and dry traction
- Strong durability and impact resistance against potholes
- High level of ride comfort and bump absorption
Cons
- Noticeable road noise, especially at lower speeds
- Run-flat variants may be unsuitable for certain vehicle suspension setups
- Dry grip performance can degrade noticeably as the tire ages
Tire B Energy
Pros
- Exceptional tread life and durability
- Noticeable improvements in fuel economy
- Low road noise and comfortable ride quality
Cons
- Lack of steering feedback and road feel
- Inconsistent or poor grip in wet conditions
- High price point relative to competitors
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Firestone Firehawk 900 | B · Michelin Energy |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Which one should you actually buy?
71
/ 100
Firestone Firehawk 900
60
/ 100
Michelin Energy
Winner: Firestone Firehawk 900 — better handling, dry and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score. Firestone Firehawk 900 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 5 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Firestone Firehawk 900 scores 76 vs 51 on handling.
Pick tire A
You want the most grip on dry roads
Firestone Firehawk 900 scores 69 vs 55 on dry.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Firestone Firehawk 900 scores 73 vs 61 on wet.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
Firestone Firehawk 900 scores 71 vs 65 on comfort.
Tire A · Firestone Firehawk 900
Tire B · Michelin Energy
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Firehawk 900 or Energy?
Which is better in the wet, Firehawk 900 or Energy?
Firestone Firehawk 900, 73 vs 61 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Firehawk 900 or Energy?
Firestone Firehawk 900, 69 vs 55 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, Firehawk 900 or Energy?
Firestone Firehawk 900, 71 vs 65 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Firehawk 900 or Energy?
Neither, by our numbers: 69 vs 67 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology