Tests – · none yet Owners 73 · 5 reviews
Firestone Firehawk 900 vs Yokohama Advan A032R — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 62 · 2 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
69
Dry
No comparison–Why this score
Source Firehawk 900 Advan A032R Reviews found online 70 – -
73
Wet
No comparison–Why this score
Source Firehawk 900 Advan A032R Reviews found online 75 – -
71
Comfort
No comparison–Why this score
Source Firehawk 900 Advan A032R Reviews found online 74 – -
69
Treadwear
No comparison–Why this score
Source Firehawk 900 Advan A032R Reviews found online 72 – -
76
Handling
No comparison–Why this score
Source Firehawk 900 Advan A032R Reviews found online 76 –
Scores at a glance
| Category | Firestone Firehawk 900 | Yokohama Advan A032R |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 71 | – |
| Dry | 69 | – |
| Wet | 73 | – |
| Comfort | 71 | – |
| Treadwear | 69 | – |
| Handling | 76 | – |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Firehawk 900
Advan A032R
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Firehawk 900
Pros
- Reliable wet and dry traction
- Strong durability and impact resistance against potholes
- High level of ride comfort and bump absorption
Cons
- Noticeable road noise, especially at lower speeds
- Run-flat variants may be unsuitable for certain vehicle suspension setups
- Dry grip performance can degrade noticeably as the tire ages
Tire B Advan A032R
Pros
- Rapid warm-up time to reach optimal operating temperature
- Predictable and progressive grip characteristics
- Excellent traction during hard braking and cornering
Cons
- Short tread life, particularly under intensive track use
- Performance degradation when exceeding optimal thermal limits
- Limited longevity compared to street-oriented tires
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Firestone Firehawk 900 | B · Yokohama Advan A032R |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer Trackday and Competition tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Which one should you actually buy?
Firestone Firehawk 900
Yokohama Advan A032R
Only Firestone Firehawk 900 has enough test and review data for a Relative Score, so there is no head-to-head winner yet.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.