tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Firestone Firehawk AS vs Hankook Dynapro HP — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 8 + 7 owner reviews. How we score

Too close to call: Firehawk AS 65, Dynapro HP 64.

Check price on Amazon · Firehawk AS Check price on Amazon · Dynapro HP
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Firestone Firehawk AS
Tire AFirestone

Firehawk AS

All Season High Performance tires

Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 63 · 8 reviews

Hankook Dynapro HP
Tire BHankook

Dynapro HP

Summer

Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 63 · 7 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 65

    Dry

    Firehawk AS +3
    62
    Why this score
    SourceFirehawk ASDynapro HP
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 64 (est.)
    Reviews found online6459

    Firehawk AS: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 64.2 = 65

    Dynapro HP: 60% × 64.2 (est.) + 40% × 59 = 62

    No road tests of dry for Firehawk AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

    No road tests of dry for Dynapro HP. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 65

    Wet

    Dynapro HP +3
    68
    Why this score
    SourceFirehawk ASDynapro HP
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online6467

    Firehawk AS: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 63.8 = 65

    Dynapro HP: 60% × 68.1 (est.) + 40% × 66.7 = 68

    No road tests of wet for Firehawk AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

    No road tests of wet for Dynapro HP. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 61

    Snow

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceFirehawk ASDynapro HP
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 65 (est.)–
    Reviews found online56–

    Firehawk AS: 60% × 65.2 (est.) + 40% × 55.8 = 61

    No road tests of snow for Firehawk AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

  4. 65

    Comfort

    Level
    65
    Why this score
    SourceFirehawk ASDynapro HP
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online6161

    Firehawk AS: 60% × 67.8 (est.) + 40% × 61.2 = 65

    Dynapro HP: 60% × 67.7 (est.) + 40% × 60.7 = 65

    No road tests of comfort for Firehawk AS or Dynapro HP. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 67

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceFirehawk ASDynapro HP
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)–
    Reviews found online67–

    Firehawk AS: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 67 = 67

    No road tests of noise for Firehawk AS. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 66

    Treadwear

    Firehawk AS +1
    65
    Why this score
    SourceFirehawk ASDynapro HP
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 65 (est.)
    Reviews found online6665

    Firehawk AS: 60% × 65.6 (est.) + 40% × 65.6 = 66

    Dynapro HP: 60% × 65.3 (est.) + 40% × 64.7 = 65

    No road tests of treadwear for Firehawk AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

    No road tests of treadwear for Dynapro HP. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  7. 61

    Handling (owners)

    Firehawk AS +4
    57
    Why this score
    SourceFirehawk ASDynapro HP
    Reviews found online6157
Scores at a glance
CategoryFirestone Firehawk ASHankook Dynapro HP
Relative Score 65 64
Dry 65 62
Wet 65 68
Snow 61 –
Comfort 65 65
Noise 67 –
Treadwear 66 65
Handling (owners) 61 57

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Firehawk AS

Dynapro HP

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Firehawk AS

Pros

  • Exceptionally quiet and smooth ride quality
  • Strong dry handling and improved cornering response
  • Good water dispersion and wet road performance for most users

Cons

  • Potential susceptibility to hydroplaning in heavy rain according to select reviewers
  • Requires proper balancing to prevent irregular tread wear
All owner themes in the Firehawk AS review

Tire B Dynapro HP

Pros

  • Impressive long-term durability and high mileage potential (up to 68,000 miles reported)
  • Stable performance for motorway travel and holiday towing under normal conditions
  • Consistent and even wear reported over extended periods (e.g., 40,000 km)

Cons

  • Extreme and premature front tire degradation, including uneven wear and a melted appearance at very low mileage
  • Lack of traction on soft or slippery surfaces like wet grass
  • Reduced performance and confidence when towing heavier loads such as a caravan
All owner themes in the Dynapro HP review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Firestone Firehawk AS B · Hankook Dynapro HP
CategoryAll Season High Performance tiresSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverSUV and 4x4
Sizes available414
Rim diameters15″ – 18″16″ – 18″
Tread depth11/32″—
UTQG480 A A—
Treadwear warranty50,000 mi—
SidewallBlackwall—
Max pressure44 psi—
Sizes in common00

Which one should you actually buy?

Firestone Firehawk AS

Hankook Dynapro HP

Too close to call: Firestone Firehawk AS and Hankook Dynapro HP are within 2 points overall. Firestone Firehawk AS is stronger on dry. Hankook Dynapro HP is stronger on wet. Firestone Firehawk AS rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 8 reviews), so read this result as provisional. Hankook Dynapro HP rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 7 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Firestone Firehawk AS scores 65 vs 62 on dry.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Hankook Dynapro HP scores 68 vs 65 on wet.

Tire A · Firestone Firehawk AS
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Hankook Dynapro HP
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Firehawk AS or Dynapro HP?

Which is better in the wet, Firehawk AS or Dynapro HP?

Hankook Dynapro HP, 68 vs 65 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Firehawk AS or Dynapro HP?

Firestone Firehawk AS, 65 vs 62 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, Firehawk AS or Dynapro HP?

Neither, by our numbers: 65 vs 65 on the comfort score, within 3 points.

Which lasts longer, Firehawk AS or Dynapro HP?

Neither, by our numbers: 66 vs 65 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology