Tests – · none yet Owners 69 · 8 reviews
Head-to-head
Updated
Firestone Firehawk AS vs Kumho Ecsta PA31 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 8 + 23 owner reviews. How we score
Firehawk AS is ahead, 69–63
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 59 · 23 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
70
Dry
Firehawk AS +763Why this score
Source Firehawk AS Ecsta PA31 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 65 (est.) Reviews found online 71 60 Firehawk AS: 60% × 69 (est.) + 40% × 70.6 = 70
Ecsta PA31: 60% × 64.6 (est.) + 40% × 59.8 = 63
No road tests of dry for Firehawk AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
No road tests of dry for Ecsta PA31. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
69
Wet
Firehawk AS +267Why this score
Source Firehawk AS Ecsta PA31 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 68 66 Firehawk AS: 60% × 69.4 (est.) + 40% × 68.4 = 69
Ecsta PA31: 60% × 67.9 (est.) + 40% × 65.5 = 67
No road tests of wet for Firehawk AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for Ecsta PA31. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
66
Snow
Firehawk AS +759Why this score
Source Firehawk AS Ecsta PA31 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 64 (est.) Reviews found online 62 51 Firehawk AS: 60% × 67.9 (est.) + 40% × 62.4 = 66
Ecsta PA31: 60% × 64.3 (est.) + 40% × 51.1 = 59
No road tests of snow for Firehawk AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
No road tests of snow for Ecsta PA31. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
69
Comfort
Firehawk AS +1158Why this score
Source Firehawk AS Ecsta PA31 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 69 54 Firehawk AS: 40% × 68.7 (est.) + 60% × 68.8 = 69
Ecsta PA31: 40% × 65.6 (est.) + 60% × 53.6 = 58
No road tests of comfort for Firehawk AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for Ecsta PA31. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
70
Noise
Firehawk AS +367Why this score
Source Firehawk AS Ecsta PA31 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 74 67 Firehawk AS: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 74.1 = 70
Ecsta PA31: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 66.7 = 67
No road tests of noise for Firehawk AS or Ecsta PA31. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
70
Treadwear
Firehawk AS +961Why this score
Source Firehawk AS Ecsta PA31 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 64 (est.) Reviews found online 72 58 Firehawk AS: 60% × 68.5 (est.) + 40% × 71.9 = 70
Ecsta PA31: 60% × 63.6 (est.) + 40% × 58.3 = 61
No road tests of treadwear for Firehawk AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for Ecsta PA31. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
67
Handling (owners)
Firehawk AS +1255Why this score
Source Firehawk AS Ecsta PA31 Reviews found online 67 55
Scores at a glance
| Category | Firestone Firehawk AS | Kumho Ecsta PA31 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 69 | 63 |
| Dry | 70 | 63 |
| Wet | 69 | 67 |
| Snow | 66 | 59 |
| Comfort | 69 | 58 |
| Noise | 70 | 67 |
| Treadwear | 70 | 61 |
| Handling (owners) | 67 | 55 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
69
/ 100
Firehawk AS
63
/ 100
Ecsta PA31
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Firehawk AS
Pros
- Exceptionally quiet and smooth ride quality
- Strong dry handling and improved cornering response
- Good water dispersion and wet road performance for most users
Cons
- Potential susceptibility to hydroplaning in heavy rain according to select reviewers
- Requires proper balancing to prevent irregular tread wear
Tire B Ecsta PA31
Pros
- Affordable price and high overall value
- Smooth and quiet ride quality
- Strong wet-weather grip and confidence
Cons
- Tendency to develop temporary flat spots when parked for a few days
- Occasional durability issues such as sidewall bubbles reported by some users
- Not intended for high-performance track use or extreme grip
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Firestone Firehawk AS | B · Kumho Ecsta PA31 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season High Performance tires | All Season Ultra High Performance tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 5 | 7 |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 18″ | 15″ – 18″ |
| Tread depth | 11/32″ | 11/32″ |
| UTQG | 480 A A | 500 A A |
| Treadwear warranty | 50,000 mi | 50,000 mi |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | 44 psi | 50 psi |
| Sizes in common | 1 | 1 |
Which one should you actually buy?
69
/ 100
Firestone Firehawk AS
63
/ 100
Kumho Ecsta PA31
Winner: Firestone Firehawk AS — better handling, comfort and treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score. Firestone Firehawk AS rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 8 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Firestone Firehawk AS scores 67 vs 55 on handling.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
Firestone Firehawk AS scores 69 vs 58 on comfort.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
Firestone Firehawk AS scores 70 vs 61 on treadwear.
Pick tire A
You want the most grip on dry roads
Firestone Firehawk AS scores 70 vs 63 on dry.
Tire A · Firestone Firehawk AS
Tire B · Kumho Ecsta PA31
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Firehawk AS or Ecsta PA31?
Which is better in the wet, Firehawk AS or Ecsta PA31?
Neither, by our numbers: 69 vs 67 on the wet score, within 3 points.
Which grips better on dry roads, Firehawk AS or Ecsta PA31?
Firestone Firehawk AS, 70 vs 63 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, Firehawk AS or Ecsta PA31?
Firestone Firehawk AS, 66 vs 59 on our snow score.
Which is quieter, Firehawk AS or Ecsta PA31?
Firestone Firehawk AS, 70 vs 67 on our noise score.
Which is more comfortable, Firehawk AS or Ecsta PA31?
Firestone Firehawk AS, 69 vs 58 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Firehawk AS or Ecsta PA31?
Firestone Firehawk AS, 70 vs 61 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology