Head-to-head Updated

Firestone Firehawk AS vs Kumho Solus KU50 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 8 + 5 owner reviews. How we score

Solus KU50 leads, 71–69 Narrow edge

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Firestone Firehawk AS
Tire AFirestone

Firehawk AS

All Season High Performance tires

± 8Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 69 · 8 reviews

Kumho Solus KU50
Tire BKumho

Solus KU50

All Season

± 8Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 71 · 5 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 70

    Dry

    Solus KU50 +1
    71
    Why this score
    SourceFirehawk ASSolus KU50
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online7173

    Firehawk AS: 60% × 69 (est.) + 40% × 70.6 = 70

    Solus KU50: 60% × 69.8 (est.) + 40% × 72.5 = 71

    No road tests of dry for Firehawk AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

    No road tests of dry for Solus KU50. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 69

    Wet

    Solus KU50 +6
    75
    Why this score
    SourceFirehawk ASSolus KU50
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 74 (est.)
    Reviews found online6876

    Firehawk AS: 60% × 69.4 (est.) + 40% × 68.4 = 69

    Solus KU50: 60% × 73.7 (est.) + 40% × 76.2 = 75

    No road tests of wet for Firehawk AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for Solus KU50. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 66

    Snow

    Level
    66
    Why this score
    SourceFirehawk ASSolus KU50
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online6264

    Firehawk AS: 60% × 67.9 (est.) + 40% × 62.4 = 66

    Solus KU50: 60% × 68.4 (est.) + 40% × 63.7 = 66

    No road tests of snow for Firehawk AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

    No road tests of snow for Solus KU50. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 69

    Comfort

    Firehawk AS +1
    68
    Why this score
    SourceFirehawk ASSolus KU50
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online6967

    Firehawk AS: 40% × 68.7 (est.) + 60% × 68.8 = 69

    Solus KU50: 40% × 68.4 (est.) + 60% × 67.2 = 68

    No road tests of comfort for Firehawk AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

    No road tests of comfort for Solus KU50. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  5. 70

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceFirehawk ASSolus KU50
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)–
    Reviews found online74–

    Firehawk AS: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 74.1 = 70

    No road tests of noise for Firehawk AS. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 70

    Treadwear

    Firehawk AS +3
    67
    Why this score
    SourceFirehawk ASSolus KU50
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online7268

    Firehawk AS: 60% × 68.5 (est.) + 40% × 71.9 = 70

    Solus KU50: 60% × 67 (est.) + 40% × 67.8 = 67

    No road tests of treadwear for Firehawk AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

    No road tests of treadwear for Solus KU50. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 67

    Handling (owners)

    Solus KU50 +10
    77
    Why this score
    SourceFirehawk ASSolus KU50
    Reviews found online6777
Scores at a glance
Firestone Firehawk AS vs Kumho Solus KU50: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryFirestone Firehawk ASKumho Solus KU50
Relative Score 69 71
Dry 70 71
Wet 69 75
Snow 66 66
Comfort 69 68
Noise 70 –
Treadwear 70 67
Handling (owners) 67 77

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

Firehawk AS

± 8

Solus KU50

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Firehawk AS

Pros

  • Exceptionally quiet and smooth ride quality
  • Strong dry handling and improved cornering response
  • Good water dispersion and wet road performance for most users

Cons

  • Potential susceptibility to hydroplaning in heavy rain according to select reviewers
  • Requires proper balancing to prevent irregular tread wear
All owner themes in the Firehawk AS review

Tire B Solus KU50

Pros

  • Excellent braking performance in dry conditions
  • Reliable traction and safety in wet weather
  • High level of user satisfaction and brand loyalty

Cons

  • Limited long-term tread life data available from current user feedback
  • Lack of diverse vehicle-specific performance reports
All owner themes in the Solus KU50 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Firestone Firehawk AS B · Kumho Solus KU50
CategoryAll Season High Performance tiresAll Season
Vehicle typePassenger Car / Crossover—
Sizes available51
Rim diameters15″ – 18″17″
Tread depth11/32″—
UTQG480 A A—
Treadwear warranty50,000 mi—
SidewallBlackwall—
Max pressure44 psi—

Which one should you actually buy?

Firestone Firehawk AS

Kumho Solus KU50

Narrow edge: Kumho Solus KU50 — better handling and wet. Pick the Firestone Firehawk AS if treadwear matters most to you. Firestone Firehawk AS rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 8 reviews), so read this result as provisional. Kumho Solus KU50 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 5 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Kumho Solus KU50 scores 77 vs 67 on handling.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Kumho Solus KU50 scores 75 vs 69 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Firestone Firehawk AS scores 70 vs 67 on treadwear.

Tire A · Firestone Firehawk AS
Tire B · Kumho Solus KU50

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Firehawk AS or Solus KU50?

Which is better in the wet, Firehawk AS or Solus KU50?

Kumho Solus KU50, 75 vs 69 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Firehawk AS or Solus KU50?

Neither, by our numbers: 70 vs 71 on the dry score, within 3 points.

Which is better in snow, Firehawk AS or Solus KU50?

Neither, by our numbers: 66 vs 66 on the snow score, within 3 points.

Which is more comfortable, Firehawk AS or Solus KU50?

Neither, by our numbers: 69 vs 68 on the comfort score, within 3 points.

Which lasts longer, Firehawk AS or Solus KU50?

Firestone Firehawk AS, 70 vs 67 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology