Tests – · none yet Owners 69 · 8 reviews
Firestone Firehawk AS vs Kumho Solus KU50 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 8 + 5 owner reviews. How we score
Solus KU50 leads, 71–69 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 71 · 5 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
70
Dry
Solus KU50 +171Why this score
Source Firehawk AS Solus KU50 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 71 73 Firehawk AS: 60% × 69 (est.) + 40% × 70.6 = 70
Solus KU50: 60% × 69.8 (est.) + 40% × 72.5 = 71
No road tests of dry for Firehawk AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
No road tests of dry for Solus KU50. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
69
Wet
Solus KU50 +675Why this score
Source Firehawk AS Solus KU50 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 74 (est.) Reviews found online 68 76 Firehawk AS: 60% × 69.4 (est.) + 40% × 68.4 = 69
Solus KU50: 60% × 73.7 (est.) + 40% × 76.2 = 75
No road tests of wet for Firehawk AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for Solus KU50. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
66
Snow
Level66Why this score
Source Firehawk AS Solus KU50 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 62 64 Firehawk AS: 60% × 67.9 (est.) + 40% × 62.4 = 66
Solus KU50: 60% × 68.4 (est.) + 40% × 63.7 = 66
No road tests of snow for Firehawk AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
No road tests of snow for Solus KU50. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
69
Comfort
Firehawk AS +168Why this score
Source Firehawk AS Solus KU50 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 69 67 Firehawk AS: 40% × 68.7 (est.) + 60% × 68.8 = 69
Solus KU50: 40% × 68.4 (est.) + 60% × 67.2 = 68
No road tests of comfort for Firehawk AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for Solus KU50. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
70
Noise
No comparison–Why this score
Source Firehawk AS Solus KU50 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) – Reviews found online 74 – Firehawk AS: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 74.1 = 70
No road tests of noise for Firehawk AS. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
70
Treadwear
Firehawk AS +367Why this score
Source Firehawk AS Solus KU50 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 72 68 Firehawk AS: 60% × 68.5 (est.) + 40% × 71.9 = 70
Solus KU50: 60% × 67 (est.) + 40% × 67.8 = 67
No road tests of treadwear for Firehawk AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for Solus KU50. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
67
Handling (owners)
Solus KU50 +1077Why this score
Source Firehawk AS Solus KU50 Reviews found online 67 77
Scores at a glance
| Category | Firestone Firehawk AS | Kumho Solus KU50 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 69 | 71 |
| Dry | 70 | 71 |
| Wet | 69 | 75 |
| Snow | 66 | 66 |
| Comfort | 69 | 68 |
| Noise | 70 | – |
| Treadwear | 70 | 67 |
| Handling (owners) | 67 | 77 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Firehawk AS
Solus KU50
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Firehawk AS
Pros
- Exceptionally quiet and smooth ride quality
- Strong dry handling and improved cornering response
- Good water dispersion and wet road performance for most users
Cons
- Potential susceptibility to hydroplaning in heavy rain according to select reviewers
- Requires proper balancing to prevent irregular tread wear
Tire B Solus KU50
Pros
- Excellent braking performance in dry conditions
- Reliable traction and safety in wet weather
- High level of user satisfaction and brand loyalty
Cons
- Limited long-term tread life data available from current user feedback
- Lack of diverse vehicle-specific performance reports
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Firestone Firehawk AS | B · Kumho Solus KU50 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season High Performance tires | All Season |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | — |
| Sizes available | 5 | 1 |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 18″ | 17″ |
| Tread depth | 11/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 480 A A | — |
| Treadwear warranty | 50,000 mi | — |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | — |
| Max pressure | 44 psi | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
Firestone Firehawk AS
Kumho Solus KU50
Narrow edge: Kumho Solus KU50 — better handling and wet. Pick the Firestone Firehawk AS if treadwear matters most to you. Firestone Firehawk AS rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 8 reviews), so read this result as provisional. Kumho Solus KU50 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 5 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Kumho Solus KU50 scores 77 vs 67 on handling.
Kumho Solus KU50 scores 75 vs 69 on wet.
Firestone Firehawk AS scores 70 vs 67 on treadwear.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Firehawk AS or Solus KU50?
Which is better in the wet, Firehawk AS or Solus KU50?
Kumho Solus KU50, 75 vs 69 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Firehawk AS or Solus KU50?
Neither, by our numbers: 70 vs 71 on the dry score, within 3 points.
Which is better in snow, Firehawk AS or Solus KU50?
Neither, by our numbers: 66 vs 66 on the snow score, within 3 points.
Which is more comfortable, Firehawk AS or Solus KU50?
Neither, by our numbers: 69 vs 68 on the comfort score, within 3 points.
Which lasts longer, Firehawk AS or Solus KU50?
Firestone Firehawk AS, 70 vs 67 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology