Tests – · none yet Owners 63 · 8 reviews
Head-to-head
Updated
Firestone Firehawk AS vs Michelin Energy — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 8 + 42 owner reviews. How we score
Firehawk AS is ahead, 65–60
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
65
Dry
Firehawk AS +1055Why this score
Source Firehawk AS Energy Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 60 (est.) Reviews found online 64 48 Firehawk AS: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 64.2 = 65
Energy: 60% × 60 (est.) + 40% × 48.4 = 55
No road tests of dry for Firehawk AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
No road tests of dry for Energy. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
-
65
Wet
Firehawk AS +461Why this score
Source Firehawk AS Energy Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 63 (est.) Reviews found online 64 57 Firehawk AS: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 63.8 = 65
Energy: 60% × 62.9 (est.) + 40% × 57.4 = 61
No road tests of wet for Firehawk AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
No road tests of wet for Energy. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
-
61
Snow
No comparison–Why this score
Source Firehawk AS Energy Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 65 (est.) – Reviews found online 56 – Firehawk AS: 60% × 65.2 (est.) + 40% × 55.8 = 61
No road tests of snow for Firehawk AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
-
65
Comfort
Level65Why this score
Source Firehawk AS Energy Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 61 60 Firehawk AS: 60% × 67.8 (est.) + 40% × 61.2 = 65
Energy: 60% × 67.6 (est.) + 40% × 60.2 = 65
No road tests of comfort for Firehawk AS or Energy. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
67
Noise
No comparison–Why this score
Source Firehawk AS Energy Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) – Reviews found online 67 – Firehawk AS: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 67 = 67
No road tests of noise for Firehawk AS. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
66
Treadwear
Energy +167Why this score
Source Firehawk AS Energy Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 66 67 Firehawk AS: 60% × 65.6 (est.) + 40% × 65.6 = 66
Energy: 60% × 66.1 (est.) + 40% × 67.3 = 67
No road tests of treadwear for Firehawk AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
No road tests of treadwear for Energy. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
-
61
Handling (owners)
Firehawk AS +1051Why this score
Source Firehawk AS Energy Reviews found online 61 51
Scores at a glance
| Category | Firestone Firehawk AS | Michelin Energy |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 65 | 60 |
| Dry | 65 | 55 |
| Wet | 65 | 61 |
| Snow | 61 | – |
| Comfort | 65 | 65 |
| Noise | 67 | – |
| Treadwear | 66 | 67 |
| Handling (owners) | 61 | 51 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
65
/ 100
Firehawk AS
60
/ 100
Energy
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Firehawk AS
Pros
- Exceptionally quiet and smooth ride quality
- Strong dry handling and improved cornering response
- Good water dispersion and wet road performance for most users
Cons
- Potential susceptibility to hydroplaning in heavy rain according to select reviewers
- Requires proper balancing to prevent irregular tread wear
Tire B Energy
Pros
- Exceptional tread life and durability
- Noticeable improvements in fuel economy
- Low road noise and comfortable ride quality
Cons
- Lack of steering feedback and road feel
- Inconsistent or poor grip in wet conditions
- High price point relative to competitors
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Firestone Firehawk AS | B · Michelin Energy |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season High Performance tires | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 4 | — |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 18″ | — |
| Tread depth | 11/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 480 A A | — |
| Treadwear warranty | 50,000 mi | — |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | — |
| Max pressure | 44 psi | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
65
/ 100
Firestone Firehawk AS
60
/ 100
Michelin Energy
Winner: Firestone Firehawk AS — better dry, handling and wet. Where the Michelin Energy is ahead, it is by less than 3 points. Firestone Firehawk AS rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 8 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Pick tire A
You want the most grip on dry roads
Firestone Firehawk AS scores 65 vs 55 on dry.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Firestone Firehawk AS scores 61 vs 51 on handling.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Firestone Firehawk AS scores 65 vs 61 on wet.
Tire A · Firestone Firehawk AS
Tire B · Michelin Energy
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Firehawk AS or Energy?
Which is better in the wet, Firehawk AS or Energy?
Firestone Firehawk AS, 65 vs 61 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Firehawk AS or Energy?
Firestone Firehawk AS, 65 vs 55 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, Firehawk AS or Energy?
Neither, by our numbers: 65 vs 65 on the comfort score, within 3 points.
Which lasts longer, Firehawk AS or Energy?
Neither, by our numbers: 66 vs 67 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology