tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Firestone Firehawk AS vs Toyo Proxes ST — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 8 + 14 owner reviews. How we score

Proxes ST is ahead, 71–64

Check price on Amazon · Proxes ST or Firehawk AS on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Firestone Firehawk AS
Tire AFirestone

Firehawk AS

All Season High Performance tires

Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 63 · 8 reviews

Toyo Proxes ST
Tire BToyo

Proxes ST

All Season

Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 73 · 14 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 65

    Dry

    Proxes ST +7
    72
    Why this score
    SourceFirehawk ASProxes ST
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 71 (est.)
    Reviews found online6475

    Firehawk AS: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 64.2 = 65

    Proxes ST: 60% × 70.5 (est.) + 40% × 74.7 = 72

    No road tests of dry for Firehawk AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

    No road tests of dry for Proxes ST. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 65

    Wet

    Proxes ST +10
    75
    Why this score
    SourceFirehawk ASProxes ST
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 74 (est.)
    Reviews found online6477

    Firehawk AS: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 63.8 = 65

    Proxes ST: 60% × 73.6 (est.) + 40% × 76.6 = 75

    No road tests of wet for Firehawk AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

    No road tests of wet for Proxes ST. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 61

    Snow

    Proxes ST +5
    66
    Why this score
    SourceFirehawk ASProxes ST
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 65 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online5664

    Firehawk AS: 60% × 65.2 (est.) + 40% × 55.8 = 61

    Proxes ST: 60% × 67.8 (est.) + 40% × 63.6 = 66

    No road tests of snow for Firehawk AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

    No road tests of snow for Proxes ST. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

  4. 65

    Comfort

    Proxes ST +7
    72
    Why this score
    SourceFirehawk ASProxes ST
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online6174

    Firehawk AS: 60% × 67.8 (est.) + 40% × 61.2 = 65

    Proxes ST: 60% × 70 (est.) + 40% × 74.1 = 72

    No road tests of comfort for Firehawk AS or Proxes ST. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 67

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceFirehawk ASProxes ST
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)–
    Reviews found online67–

    Firehawk AS: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 67 = 67

    No road tests of noise for Firehawk AS. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 66

    Treadwear

    Proxes ST +3
    69
    Why this score
    SourceFirehawk ASProxes ST
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online6672

    Firehawk AS: 60% × 65.6 (est.) + 40% × 65.6 = 66

    Proxes ST: 60% × 67.5 (est.) + 40% × 71.7 = 69

    No road tests of treadwear for Firehawk AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

    No road tests of treadwear for Proxes ST. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  7. 61

    Handling (owners)

    Proxes ST +10
    71
    Why this score
    SourceFirehawk ASProxes ST
    Reviews found online6171
Scores at a glance
CategoryFirestone Firehawk ASToyo Proxes ST
Relative Score 64 71
Dry 65 72
Wet 65 75
Snow 61 66
Comfort 65 72
Noise 67 –
Treadwear 66 69
Handling (owners) 61 71

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Firehawk AS

Proxes ST

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Firehawk AS

Pros

  • Exceptionally quiet and smooth ride quality
  • Strong dry handling and improved cornering response
  • Good water dispersion and wet road performance for most users

Cons

  • Potential susceptibility to hydroplaning in heavy rain according to select reviewers
  • Requires proper balancing to prevent irregular tread wear
All owner themes in the Firehawk AS review

Tire B Proxes ST

Pros

  • Exceptional tread life and long-term durability
  • Quiet and comfortable ride quality compared to other brands and run-flats
  • Strong dry and wet grip with good resistance to aquaplaning

Cons

  • Poor performance and limited traction in snow and ice
  • A small number of users experienced disappointing treadwear and longevity
  • Conflicting feedback regarding wet grip, with isolated reports of poor performance
All owner themes in the Proxes ST review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Firestone Firehawk AS B · Toyo Proxes ST
CategoryAll Season High Performance tiresAll Season
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverSUV and 4x4
Sizes available41
Rim diameters15″ – 18″19″
Tread depth11/32″—
UTQG480 A A—
Treadwear warranty50,000 mi—
SidewallBlackwall—
Max pressure44 psi—

Which one should you actually buy?

Firestone Firehawk AS

Toyo Proxes ST

Winner: Toyo Proxes ST — better wet, handling and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score. Firestone Firehawk AS rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 8 reviews), so read this result as provisional. Toyo Proxes ST rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 14 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Toyo Proxes ST scores 75 vs 65 on wet.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Toyo Proxes ST scores 71 vs 61 on handling.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Toyo Proxes ST scores 72 vs 65 on dry.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Toyo Proxes ST scores 72 vs 65 on comfort.

Tire A · Firestone Firehawk AS
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Toyo Proxes ST
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Firehawk AS or Proxes ST?

Which is better in the wet, Firehawk AS or Proxes ST?

Toyo Proxes ST, 75 vs 65 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Firehawk AS or Proxes ST?

Toyo Proxes ST, 72 vs 65 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, Firehawk AS or Proxes ST?

Toyo Proxes ST, 66 vs 61 on our snow score.

Which is more comfortable, Firehawk AS or Proxes ST?

Toyo Proxes ST, 72 vs 65 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Firehawk AS or Proxes ST?

Toyo Proxes ST, 69 vs 66 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology