Head-to-head Updated

Firestone Firehawk Indy 500 vs Yokohama A.Drive — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 1 + 0 road tests and 1,457 + 28 owner reviews. How we score

Firehawk Indy 500 is ahead, 69–62

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Firestone Firehawk Indy 500

Tests – · 1 test Owners 63 · 1,457 reviews

Best test result: #6 of 22 in 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance Summer Tires (tested tread life (miles))

“I just put Firestone Firehawk Indy 500's on my NC2 and I like them and would recommend them. I paid about $635 with installation at Costco but you might even be able to find them for less elsewhere.”

Yokohama A.Drive
Tire BYokohama

A.Drive

Summer

Tests – · none yet Owners 60 · 28 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 73

    Dry

    Firehawk Indy 500 +12
    61
    Why this score
    SourceFirehawk Indy 500A.Drive
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 71 (est.)≈ 64 (est.)
    Reviews found online7758

    Firehawk Indy 500: 60% × 71.3 (est.) + 40% × 76.5 = 73

    A.Drive: 60% × 63.7 (est.) + 40% × 57.7 = 61

    No road tests of dry for Firehawk Indy 500. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

    No road tests of dry for A.Drive. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 67

    Wet

    Firehawk Indy 500 +5
    62
    Why this score
    SourceFirehawk Indy 500A.Drive
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 64 (est.)
    Reviews found online6659

    Firehawk Indy 500: 60% × 67.6 (est.) + 40% × 65.9 = 67

    A.Drive: 60% × 63.5 (est.) + 40% × 58.6 = 62

    No road tests of wet for Firehawk Indy 500. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

    No road tests of wet for A.Drive. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 44

    Snow

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceFirehawk Indy 500A.Drive
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 55 (est.)–
    Reviews found online26–

    Firehawk Indy 500: 60% × 55.3 (est.) + 40% × 25.9 = 44

    No road tests of snow for Firehawk Indy 500. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

  4. 67

    Comfort

    Firehawk Indy 500 +3
    64
    Why this score
    SourceFirehawk Indy 500A.Drive
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online6558

    Firehawk Indy 500: 60% × 68.5 (est.) + 40% × 65.2 = 67

    A.Drive: 60% × 67.2 (est.) + 40% × 58.2 = 64

    No road tests of comfort for Firehawk Indy 500 or A.Drive. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 67

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceFirehawk Indy 500A.Drive
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)–
    Reviews found online67–

    Firehawk Indy 500: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 67 = 67

    No road tests of noise for Firehawk Indy 500. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 67

    Treadwear

    Firehawk Indy 500 +2
    65
    Why this score
    SourceFirehawk Indy 500A.Drive
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests70≈ 65 (est.)
    Reviews found online6264

    Firehawk Indy 500: 60% × 70.2 + 40% × 61.9 = 67

    A.Drive: 60% × 65.2 (est.) + 40% × 64.4 = 65

    No road tests of treadwear for A.Drive. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  7. 71

    Handling (owners)

    Firehawk Indy 500 +12
    59
    Why this score
    SourceFirehawk Indy 500A.Drive
    Reviews found online7159
Scores at a glance
Firestone Firehawk Indy 500 vs Yokohama A.Drive: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryFirestone Firehawk Indy 500Yokohama A.Drive
Relative Score 69 62
Dry 73 61
Wet 67 62
Snow 44 –
Comfort 67 64
Noise 67 –
Treadwear 67 65
Handling (owners) 71 59

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Firehawk Indy 500

A.Drive

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Firehawk Indy 500

Pros

  • Exceptional value and affordability compared to premium tier brands like Michelin
  • Outstanding dry grip and confident, responsive cornering capabilities
  • Surprisingly quiet and comfortable ride quality on the highway

Cons

  • Accelerated tread wear and shorter overall lifespan
  • Poor performance and loss of traction in cold temperatures (below 40°F)
  • Vulnerability to hydroplaning or reduced traction in heavy standing water
All owner themes in the Firehawk Indy 500 review

Tire B A.Drive

Pros

  • Competitive price point offering good value for money
  • Reliable and predictable grip in dry road conditions
  • Solid durability and tread life for many users

Cons

  • Significant issues with wet-weather traction and aquaplaning
  • High levels of road noise, particularly at highway speeds
  • Inconsistent tread wear performance across different driving styles
All owner themes in the A.Drive review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Firestone Firehawk Indy 500

Positive

Community sentiment toward the Firestone Firehawk Indy 500 is overwhelmingly positive, with drivers frequently praising it as an exceptional value and budget-friendly alternative to premium summer tires. Owners report strong dry grip, solid wet-weather traction, good comfort, and predictable handling, though some note reduced performance in cold temperatures, softer sidewalls, and a tendency to get greasy during aggressive track sessions. Interest is also growing around the newer V2 version and its updated compound and tread design.

bobistheoilguy.com ·2022-07-14

“At autocross, as a passenger in my main rivals car(in the slow fwd crap cars on UHP's division), my heart sank as these firehawks would take all sorts of hamfisted overdriving and still grip very well with all sorts of fwd full throttle understeer.... Granted his were new and my sport comp2's had one season on them, but it was shocking how they gripped better with lots of slip angle or wheelspin, compared to my tires... I did manage to beat him still, but I think I was much more on a knife edge than him for the whole run....”

fiestastforum.com ·2022-11-30

“I should walk back on my comment about there being numerous other tires I would choose. I forget about many tires getting damaged by cold weather. Like others I've had good luck with Firehawk Indy 500's. They are usually very competitvely priced. I actually got caught in a snowstorm with my CTS-V and made it home safely without a scare, with that being said you probably would be better off with something in the UHPAS class. I've had insanely good luck with Continental DWS06. They barely give up much performance to the Sport Contacts that I'm currently running, but the Continentals are only sold in 205/45R17, so you have to ask yourself if you are okay with a slightly taller sidewall. The continentals have a rebate going on too, but I think it ends today. Not sure if it is going to be renewed for next month.”

r/Mustang ·7 upvotes ·2025-02-13

“Will I regret buying Firestone Firehawk Indy 500s? I have a stock '21 GT Premium convertible with the black appearance package. It came with the upgraded Pirelli P Zero 255/40-19 tires, but with 35,000 miles, they are really worn, and I need new tires. I live in North Florida. We don't have a lot of cold weather (I missed the snow last month), but I do get a lot of rain. I don't track the car, and mostly drive on country roads and the interstate. The Pirelli's have treated me well as far as traction, dry and wet. I like the aggressive look of the Firehawks, but I am concerned about wet weather traction. Will the Firehawks be at least comparable to the Pirelli's for wet weather and general handling? If not, it sounds like the Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 4 is the way to go. Also, the car is all black, with black rims, and the tires look wimpy. I'm not up for new rims this go-round, and I won't lower it because I like the clearance for potholes, etc., that I see a lot of in my area. I'm hoping the tires will help the look a little bit. Read more”

Top themes
#value and pricing#dry grip and traction#wet weather handling#track and autocross use#cold temperature limitations#ride comfort and road noise#Firehawk Indy 500 V2

Based on 146 community posts

Tire B

Yokohama A.Drive

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Firestone Firehawk Indy 500 B · Yokohama A.Drive
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available47—
Rim diameters16″ – 20″—
Tread depth9 - 10/32″—
UTQG340 A A—
SidewallBlack Side Wall—
Max pressure50 - 51 psi—

Which one should you actually buy?

Firestone Firehawk Indy 500

Yokohama A.Drive

Winner: Firestone Firehawk Indy 500 — better dry, handling and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Firestone Firehawk Indy 500 scores 73 vs 61 on dry.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Firestone Firehawk Indy 500 scores 71 vs 59 on handling.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Firestone Firehawk Indy 500 scores 67 vs 62 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Firestone Firehawk Indy 500 scores 67 vs 64 on comfort.

Tire A · Firestone Firehawk Indy 500
Tire B · Yokohama A.Drive

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Firehawk Indy 500 or A.Drive?

Which is better in the wet, Firehawk Indy 500 or A.Drive?

Firestone Firehawk Indy 500, 67 vs 62 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Firehawk Indy 500 or A.Drive?

Firestone Firehawk Indy 500, 73 vs 61 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, Firehawk Indy 500 or A.Drive?

Firestone Firehawk Indy 500, 67 vs 64 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Firehawk Indy 500 or A.Drive?

Neither, by our numbers: 67 vs 65 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology