Head-to-head Updated

Firestone firehawk S790 vs Kumho Solus 4 All Weather — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Tire AFirestone

firehawk S790

Summer High Performance tires

Tests – · none yet Owners 49 · 2 reviews

Not enough data yet to score these two side by side

We need test results or owner reviews in at least one shared category for both tires. What we know about each is on its own page.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A firehawk S790

Pros

  • Progressive breakaway characteristics when grip is lost
  • Adequate overall dry grip levels

Cons

  • Poor directional stability and tracking
  • High driver fatigue due to constant steering corrections
  • Lack of ride comfort despite the profile specification
All owner themes in the firehawk S790 review

Tire B Solus 4 All Weather

Pros

  • Reliable traction in dry conditions
  • Confident performance on wet surfaces
  • Effective capability in light snow

Cons

  • Extremely rapid tread wear
  • Poor overall longevity compared to summer tires
  • Lack of cost-effectiveness due to frequent replacement intervals
All owner themes in the Solus 4 All Weather review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Firestone firehawk S790 B · Kumho Solus 4 All Weather
CategorySummer High Performance tiresAll Season Touring tires
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover

Which one should you actually buy?

Firestone firehawk S790

Kumho Solus 4 All Weather

Neither tire has enough test or review data for a Relative Score yet.

Tire A · Firestone firehawk S790
Tire B · Kumho Solus 4 All Weather

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.