Tests – · none yet Owners 72 · 40 reviews
Continental ContiMaxContact MC6 vs Firestone firehawk S790 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 49 · 2 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
74
Dry
No comparison–Why this score
Source ContiMaxContact MC6 firehawk S790 Reviews found online 77 – -
72
Wet
No comparison–Why this score
Source ContiMaxContact MC6 firehawk S790 Reviews found online 73 – -
70
Comfort
No comparison–Why this score
Source ContiMaxContact MC6 firehawk S790 Reviews found online 70 – -
65
Treadwear
No comparison–Why this score
Source ContiMaxContact MC6 firehawk S790 Reviews found online 64 – -
76
Handling
No comparison–Why this score
Source ContiMaxContact MC6 firehawk S790 Reviews found online 76 –
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental ContiMaxContact MC6 | Firestone firehawk S790 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 71 | – |
| Dry | 74 | – |
| Wet | 72 | – |
| Comfort | 70 | – |
| Treadwear | 65 | – |
| Handling | 76 | – |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
ContiMaxContact MC6
firehawk S790
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A ContiMaxContact MC6
Pros
- Excellent dry and wet traction with high cornering confidence
- High value-for-money proposition compared to premium competitors
- Direct and responsive steering feedback
Cons
- Mixed reports on tread life, with some users experiencing premature wear
- Soft sidewalls susceptible to damage from curb impacts
- Inconsistent noise levels, with some users finding them loud on rough tarmac
Tire B firehawk S790
Pros
- Progressive breakaway characteristics when grip is lost
- Adequate overall dry grip levels
Cons
- Poor directional stability and tracking
- High driver fatigue due to constant steering corrections
- Lack of ride comfort despite the profile specification
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental ContiMaxContact MC6 | B · Firestone firehawk S790 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer High Performance tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 3 | — |
| Rim diameters | 19″ – 21″ | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
Continental ContiMaxContact MC6
Firestone firehawk S790
Only Continental ContiMaxContact MC6 has enough test and review data for a Relative Score, so there is no head-to-head winner yet.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.