Head-to-head Updated

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 vs Continental ContiMaxContact MC6 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 18 + 0 road tests and 3,619 + 41 owner reviews. How we score

Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 is ahead, 84–72

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
± 4

Tests 86 · 18 tests Owners 80 · 3,619 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 20 in 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test (wear)

“F1 Asy 5s on my S204. I can confirm they are pretty decent and have coped well with the tarmac-ripping 154hp and 184 lbs-ft torque of the M274 fitted to my wagon”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 85

    Dry

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 +11
    74
    Why this score
    SourceEagle F1 Asymmetric 5ContiMaxContact MC6
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 17 / – tests85≈ 72 (est.)
    Reviews found online8577

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5: 60% × 85.4 + 40% × 84.8 = 85

    ContiMaxContact MC6: 60% × 71.8 (est.) + 40% × 77.1 = 74

    No road tests of dry for ContiMaxContact MC6. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 89

    Wet

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 +16
    73
    Why this score
    SourceEagle F1 Asymmetric 5ContiMaxContact MC6
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 17 / – tests92≈ 72 (est.)
    Reviews found online8573

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5: 60% × 92.2 + 40% × 85.2 = 89

    ContiMaxContact MC6: 60% × 72.1 (est.) + 40% × 73.2 = 73

    No road tests of wet for ContiMaxContact MC6. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 80

    Comfort

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 +11
    69
    Why this score
    SourceEagle F1 Asymmetric 5ContiMaxContact MC6
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 8 / – tests90≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online7470

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5: 40% × 90.1 + 60% × 74 = 80

    ContiMaxContact MC6: 40% × 69 (est.) + 60% × 69.8 = 69

    No road tests of comfort for ContiMaxContact MC6. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  4. 70

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceEagle F1 Asymmetric 5ContiMaxContact MC6
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 13 / – tests73–
    Reviews found online≈ 66 (est.)–

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5: 60% × 72.8 + 40% × 66.3 (est.) = 70

    No owner ratings of noise for Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  5. 78

    Treadwear

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 +14
    64
    Why this score
    SourceEagle F1 Asymmetric 5ContiMaxContact MC6
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / – tests83≈ 65 (est.)
    Reviews found online7163

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5: 60% × 82.8 + 40% × 70.9 = 78

    ContiMaxContact MC6: 60% × 65.2 (est.) + 40% × 62.9 = 64

    No road tests of treadwear for ContiMaxContact MC6. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  6. 84

    Handling (owners)

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 +6
    78
    Why this score
    SourceEagle F1 Asymmetric 5ContiMaxContact MC6
    Reviews found online8478
  7. 61

    Efficiency

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceEagle F1 Asymmetric 5ContiMaxContact MC6
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 14 / – tests61–
Scores at a glance
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 vs Continental ContiMaxContact MC6: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryGoodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5Continental ContiMaxContact MC6
Relative Score 84 72
Dry 85 74
Wet 89 73
Comfort 80 69
Noise 70 –
Treadwear 78 64
Handling (owners) 84 78
Efficiency 61 –

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 4

Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5

± 8

ContiMaxContact MC6

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5

Pros

  • Exceptional wet and dry grip
  • Precise steering response and high-speed stability
  • Strong value for money compared to tier-one rivals

Cons

  • Faster-than-expected tread wear for some aggressive drivers
  • Notable road noise on coarse or concrete road surfaces
  • Stiffer sidewalls can lead to a harsher ride quality on certain vehicles
All owner themes in the Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 review

Tire B ContiMaxContact MC6

Pros

  • Excellent dry and wet traction with high cornering confidence
  • High value-for-money proposition compared to premium competitors
  • Direct and responsive steering feedback

Cons

  • Mixed reports on tread life, with some users experiencing premature wear
  • Soft sidewalls susceptible to damage from curb impacts
  • Inconsistent noise levels, with some users finding them loud on rough tarmac
All owner themes in the ContiMaxContact MC6 review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5

Positive

Community members generally view the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 very positively, frequently praising its wet grip, cold weather performance, and steering feel when compared to rivals like Michelin Pilot Sport 4 and Pirelli P Zero. While some users find them exceptionally quiet, others note moderate road noise or low-speed scrubbing on full lock.

Top themes
#wet grip performance#comparison to Michelin PS4#road noise levels#cold temperature handling#full lock scrubbing

Based on 13 community posts

Tire B

Continental ContiMaxContact MC6

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 B · Continental ContiMaxContact MC6
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available643
Rim diameters17″ – 22″19″ – 21″
Tread depth7 - 9/32″—
UTQG300 - 500 A - AA A—
SidewallBlack Side Wall - Serrated Black Lettering—
Max pressure50 - 51 psi—
Sizes in common00

Which one should you actually buy?

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5

Continental ContiMaxContact MC6

Winner: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 — better wet, treadwear and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 scores 89 vs 73 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 scores 78 vs 64 on treadwear.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 scores 85 vs 74 on dry.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 scores 80 vs 69 on comfort.

Tire A · Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
Tire B · Continental ContiMaxContact MC6

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 or ContiMaxContact MC6?

Which is better in the wet, Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 or ContiMaxContact MC6?

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5, 89 vs 73 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 or ContiMaxContact MC6?

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5, 85 vs 74 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 or ContiMaxContact MC6?

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5, 80 vs 69 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 or ContiMaxContact MC6?

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5, 78 vs 64 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology