Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 18 + 14 road tests and 3,611 + 261 owner reviews. How we score
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 is ahead, 83–75
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 86 · 18 tests Owners 80 · 3,611 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 20 in 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test (wear)
“F1 Asy 5s on my S204. I can confirm they are pretty decent and have coped well with the tarmac-ripping 154hp and 184 lbs-ft torque of the M274 fitted to my wagon”
Tests 72 · 14 tests Owners 77 · 261 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 10 in 2020 Auto Bild UHP 19 inch Tyre Test (wet handling)
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
| Source | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 | Eagle F1 SuperSport |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 17 / 14 tests | 85 | 87 |
| Reviews found online | 85 | 87 |
| Dry Braking (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–0 | 96% | 96% |
| Dry Handling (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–1 | 97% | 98% |
| Dry Handling (tester's mark) (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–1 | 75% | 83% |
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5: 60% × 85.4 + 40% × 84.7 = 85
Eagle F1 SuperSport: 60% × 86.8 + 40% × 87 = 87
| Source | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 | Eagle F1 SuperSport |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 17 / 14 tests | 92 | 82 |
| Reviews found online | 85 | 80 |
| Straight Aquaplaning (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–0 | 96% | 93% |
| Wet Handling (tester's mark) (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–0 | 100% | 70% |
| Wet Braking (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–0 | 95% | 92% |
| Wet Circle (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–0 | 96% | 96% |
| Wet Handling (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–0 | 100% | 96% |
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5: 60% × 92.1 + 40% × 85.1 = 89
Eagle F1 SuperSport: 60% × 82.4 + 40% × 79.9 = 81
| Source | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 | Eagle F1 SuperSport |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 8 / 4 tests | 91 | 26 |
| Reviews found online | 74 | 68 |
| Comfort (tester's mark) (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–0 | 100% | 80% |
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5: 40% × 90.7 + 60% × 74 = 81
Eagle F1 SuperSport: 40% × 26.4 + 60% × 67.5 = 51
| Source | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 | Eagle F1 SuperSport |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 13 / 10 tests | 73 | 33 |
| Reviews found online | ≈ 66 (est.) | 75 |
| Noise (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–0 | 99% | 97% |
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5: 60% × 72.9 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 70
Eagle F1 SuperSport: 60% × 32.8 + 40% × 75.3 = 50
No owner ratings of noise for Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
| Source | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 | Eagle F1 SuperSport |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / – tests | 83 | ≈ 66 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 71 | 65 |
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5: 60% × 82.8 + 40% × 70.9 = 78
Eagle F1 SuperSport: 60% × 65.8 (est.) + 40% × 64.5 = 65
No road tests of treadwear for Eagle F1 SuperSport. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
| Source | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 | Eagle F1 SuperSport |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews found online | 84 | 85 |
| Source | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 | Eagle F1 SuperSport |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 14 / 14 tests | 61 | 23 |
| Rolling Resistance (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–0 | 100% | 94% |
| Category | Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 | Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 83 | 75 |
| Dry | 85 | 87 |
| Wet | 89 | 81 |
| Comfort | 81 | 51 |
| Noise | 70 | 50 |
| Treadwear | 78 | 65 |
| Handling (owners) | 84 | 85 |
| Efficiency | 61 | 23 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
Eagle F1 SuperSport
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
In the overall rankings of 1 tests that ran both, Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 finished ahead 1 times and Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport 0 times.
| Discipline | Category | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 | Eagle F1 SuperSport | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Braking | Dry | 96% | 96% | 0.0 | 0–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2020 UHP, UUHP and Track Day Tyre Test · 245/35 R19 |
| Dry Handling | Dry | 97% | 98% | −1.0 | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2020 UHP, UUHP and Track Day Tyre Test · 245/35 R19 |
| Dry Handling (tester's mark) | Dry | 75% | 83% | −8.0 | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2020 UHP, UUHP and Track Day Tyre Test · 245/35 R19 |
| Curved Aquaplaning | Wet | 91% #5/15 · 2021 Auto Bild 19 inch Summer Tyre Test | 99% #3/7 · 2025 Autobild Sportcars Summer Tire Test R20 | – | Different tests |
| Straight Aquaplaning | Wet | 96% | 93% | +3.0 | 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2020 UHP, UUHP and Track Day Tyre Test · 245/35 R19 |
| Wet Braking | Wet | 95% | 92% | +3.0 | 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2020 UHP, UUHP and Track Day Tyre Test · 245/35 R19 |
| Wet Circle | Wet | 96% | 96% | 0.0 | 0–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2020 UHP, UUHP and Track Day Tyre Test · 245/35 R19 |
| Wet Handling | Wet | 100% | 96% | +4.0 | 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2020 UHP, UUHP and Track Day Tyre Test · 245/35 R19 |
| Wet Handling (tester's mark) | Wet | 100% | 70% | +30.0 | 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2020 UHP, UUHP and Track Day Tyre Test · 245/35 R19 |
| Comfort (tester's mark) | Comfort | 100% | 80% | +20.0 | 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2020 UHP, UUHP and Track Day Tyre Test · 245/35 R19 |
| Noise | Noise | 99% | 97% | +2.0 | 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2020 UHP, UUHP and Track Day Tyre Test · 245/35 R19 |
| Noise (tester's mark) | Noise | 100% #3/8 · 2020 Gute Fahrt SUV Summer Tyre Test | 60% #8/8 · 2025 Die Reifentester UHP Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Rolling Resistance | Efficiency | 100% | 94% | +6.0 | 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2020 UHP, UUHP and Track Day Tyre Test · 245/35 R19 |
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Price | Cost | 77% #7/10 · 2021 Auto Zeitung Summer UHP Tyre Test | 73% #4/10 · 2022 Sport Auto UHP, UUHP and Semi Slick Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Tyre Weight | Other | 100% | 94% | +6.0 | 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2020 UHP, UUHP and Track Day Tyre Test · 245/35 R19 |
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #4/10 | #5/10 | – | 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2020 UHP, UUHP and Track Day Tyre Test · 245/35 R19 |
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Community members generally view the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 very positively, frequently praising its wet grip, cold weather performance, and steering feel when compared to rivals like Michelin Pilot Sport 4 and Pirelli P Zero. While some users find them exceptionally quiet, others note moderate road noise or low-speed scrubbing on full lock.
“2024 J1.1 GTS Sport Turismo on 21" Spyder RS wheels here. Went from Pirelli PZero's to NF1 Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5's recently. They don't seem any louder than the PZero's, dry grip seems about the same, as does comfort. Wet grip and performance in cold conditions (I'm in Scotland, UK) over the PZero's is noticeably better. Very little in the way of the Ackerman effect in cold temperatures, compared to the PZero's which made an awful noise and skipped badly when turning at slow speeds, pulling out of junctions. Will see how they do wear rate wise, PZero's had about 2.5 to 3mm left at 16k miles. Anything approaching that on the ASY5's would be good. Unfortunately on the J1.1 on 21"'s the choice is essentially PZero's or ASY5's. Which is disappointing as I had PS4S's and CSC7's on my previous cars (G81 M3 and M340i Touring) and they were fantastic.”
“I have them fitted in both my cars (Audi A6 and CLK350). Neither had the performance of your AMG but I can confirm they are the best tyres I’ve ever had in terms of grip and feel.”
Based on 13 community posts
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
| Attribute | A · Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 | B · Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 64 | 75 |
| Rim diameters | 17″ – 22″ | 18″ – 23″ |
| Tread depth | 7 - 9/32″ | 7 - 10/32″ |
| UTQG | 300 - 500 A - AA A | 080 - 300 A - AA A |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall - Serrated Black Lettering | Black Side Wall - Serrated Black Lettering |
| Max pressure | 50 - 51 psi | 50 - 51 psi |
| Sizes in common | 30 | 30 |
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport
Winner: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 — better efficiency, comfort and noise. Where the Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport is ahead, it is by less than 3 points.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 scores 61 vs 23 on efficiency.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 scores 81 vs 51 on comfort.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 scores 70 vs 50 on noise.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 scores 78 vs 65 on treadwear.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5, 89 vs 81 on our wet score.
Neither, by our numbers: 85 vs 87 on the dry score, within 3 points.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5, 70 vs 50 on our noise score.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5, 81 vs 51 on our comfort score.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5, 78 vs 65 on our treadwear score.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5, 61 vs 23 on our efficiency score.
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology
