Tests – · none yet Owners 38 · 30 reviews
Firestone FR710 vs Michelin Energy MXV4+ — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.
Energy MXV4+ is ahead, 55–46
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 52 · 4 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
45
Dry
Energy MXV4+ +449Why this score
Source FR710 Energy MXV4+ Reviews found online 32 39 -
47
Wet
Energy MXV4+ +855Why this score
Source FR710 Energy MXV4+ Reviews found online 39 49 -
50
Snow
No comparison–Why this score
Source FR710 Energy MXV4+ Reviews found online 37 – -
51
Comfort
Energy MXV4+ +1768Why this score
Source FR710 Energy MXV4+ Reviews found online 34 66 -
60
Noise
No comparison–Why this score
Source FR710 Energy MXV4+ Reviews found online 50 – -
50
Treadwear
Energy MXV4+ +1666Why this score
Source FR710 Energy MXV4+ Reviews found online 40 67 -
39
Handling
Energy MXV4+ +443Why this score
Source FR710 Energy MXV4+ Reviews found online 39 43
Scores at a glance
| Category | Firestone FR710 | Michelin Energy MXV4+ |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 46 | 55 |
| Dry | 45 | 49 |
| Wet | 47 | 55 |
| Snow | 50 | – |
| Comfort | 51 | 68 |
| Noise | 60 | – |
| Treadwear | 50 | 66 |
| Handling | 39 | 43 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neither tire has a score here yet, so this weight changes nothing.
Neither tire has a score here yet, so this weight changes nothing.
FR710
Energy MXV4+
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A FR710
Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.
Tire B Energy MXV4+
Pros
- Exceptional ride comfort and cabin quietness
- High tread longevity and durability
- Strong value proposition as an OEM-style replacement
Cons
- Poor steering response and handling precision
- Degraded wet weather performance as the tread wears
- Instability and vibration issues at higher highway speeds
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Firestone FR710 | B · Michelin Energy MXV4+ |
|---|---|---|
| Category | — | All Season Premium Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 4 | — |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 18″ | — |
| Tread depth | 11/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 560 A B | — |
| Treadwear warranty | 65,000 mi | — |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | — |
| Max pressure | 44 psi | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
Firestone FR710
Michelin Energy MXV4+
Winner: Michelin Energy MXV4+ — better comfort, treadwear and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Michelin Energy MXV4+ scores 68 vs 51 on comfort.
Michelin Energy MXV4+ scores 66 vs 50 on treadwear.
Michelin Energy MXV4+ scores 55 vs 47 on wet.
Michelin Energy MXV4+ scores 49 vs 45 on dry.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.