Tests – · none yet Owners 38 · 6 reviews
Firestone FR740 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Firestone FR740 vs Michelin Agilis CrossClimate — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 3 road tests and 6 + 1,072 owner reviews. How we score
Agilis CrossClimate is ahead, 78–49
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 72 · 3 tests Owners 85 · 1,072 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 7 in 2020 Commercial Van All Season Tyre Test (dry braking)
“We have the Agilis cross climates on our C-class 3.5t MH and have been utterly delighted with them. They’re quiet, really grippy and give a great ride. What’s not to like?”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
49
Dry
Agilis CrossClimate +3079Why this score
Source FR740 Agilis CrossClimate Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests ≈ 56 (est.) 74 Reviews found online 39 87 FR740: 60% × 55.9 (est.) + 40% × 38.6 = 49
Agilis CrossClimate: 60% × 74.3 + 40% × 87 = 79
No road tests of dry for FR740. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
48
Wet
Agilis CrossClimate +3078Why this score
Source FR740 Agilis CrossClimate Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests ≈ 54 (est.) 71 Reviews found online 40 88 FR740: 60% × 53.8 (est.) + 40% × 39.7 = 48
Agilis CrossClimate: 60% × 71.1 + 40% × 87.8 = 78
No road tests of wet for FR740. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
50
Snow
Agilis CrossClimate +2878Why this score
Source FR740 Agilis CrossClimate Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests ≈ 59 (est.) 76 Reviews found online 35 82 FR740: 60% × 59.3 (est.) + 40% × 35.2 = 50
Agilis CrossClimate: 60% × 75.6 + 40% × 81.6 = 78
No road tests of snow for FR740. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
43
Comfort
Agilis CrossClimate +2871Why this score
Source FR740 Agilis CrossClimate Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 61 (est.) 55 Reviews found online 31 81 FR740: 40% × 61.1 (est.) + 60% × 31 = 43
Agilis CrossClimate: 40% × 54.8 + 60% × 81.1 = 71
No road tests of comfort for FR740. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
57
Noise
Agilis CrossClimate +1976Why this score
Source FR740 Agilis CrossClimate Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests ≈ 66 (est.) 82 Reviews found online 44 ≈ 66 (est.) FR740: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 43.9 = 57
Agilis CrossClimate: 60% × 82 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 76
No road tests of noise for FR740. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
No owner ratings of noise for Agilis CrossClimate. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
-
49
Treadwear
Agilis CrossClimate +2978Why this score
Source FR740 Agilis CrossClimate Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 56 (est.) ≈ 73 (est.) Reviews found online 38 85 FR740: 60% × 56.3 (est.) + 40% × 38.2 = 49
Agilis CrossClimate: 60% × 73.2 (est.) + 40% × 85 = 78
No road tests of treadwear for FR740. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for Agilis CrossClimate. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
–
Handling (owners)
No comparison81Why this score
Source FR740 Agilis CrossClimate Reviews found online – 81 -
–
Efficiency
No comparison71Why this score
Source FR740 Agilis CrossClimate Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests – 71
Scores at a glance
| Category | Firestone FR740 | Michelin Agilis CrossClimate |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 49 | 78 |
| Dry | 49 | 79 |
| Wet | 48 | 78 |
| Snow | 50 | 78 |
| Comfort | 43 | 71 |
| Noise | 57 | 76 |
| Treadwear | 49 | 78 |
| Handling (owners) | – | 81 |
| Efficiency | – | 71 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
FR740
Agilis CrossClimate
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A FR740
Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.
Tire B Agilis CrossClimate
Pros
- Outstanding wet and winter weather traction
- Exceptional tread life and long-term durability
- Stiff sidewalls providing enhanced cornering stability and handling
Cons
- Slightly higher road noise or low drone at certain speeds
- Higher initial purchase price compared to standard options
- A few reports of a minor decrease in fuel economy
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Firestone FR740
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Michelin Agilis CrossClimate
Community sentiment toward the Michelin Agilis CrossClimate is largely positive, with owners of vans, RVs, and heavy-duty trucks praising its wet and snow traction, quiet ride, and capability under heavy loads. However, discussions frequently highlight trade-offs such as faster tread wear compared to the Defender series and concerns regarding an NHTSA recall on certain C-metric sizes for snow traction marking non-compliance. Prospective buyers also note confusion regarding the differing directional C-metric and non-directional LT-metric designs.
“Just an update. I emailed Michelin about the Agilis vs. Defender: My email: I am thinking of using LT 275/65/18 for my Land Cruiser. I cannot decide between Michelin Defender vs. Agilis CrossClimate. I do plan on taking my car off-roading over mild terrain (more rocky, less mud). My Land Cruiser is around 6000 lbs. I read that Agilis has double the nylon reinforcement as Defender and has a tougher sidewall. Are these things true? Is Agilis a tougher tire? On-road, is Agilis as quiet as Defender? How is the rolling resistance between the two (same size)? Thank you in advance. -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Michelin’s response: We would like to thank you for contacting us! We would recommend that Michelin Defender LTX M/S tires for your luxury SUV. The Michelin Defender LTX M/S tires are going to be quieter, due to the tread grooves been closer. Also, the rolling resistance will be a little better. The Michelin Agilis Cross Climate is an excellent tire that serves well for all weather performance and built with a little more strength for more heavier larger vehicles, like 2500 or 3500 trucks.”
“Looking to replace my summer tires for my work van. I carry about 2,000 lbs of cargo and have another set of wheels&tires for snow. These would just be for pavement/highway use. Im looking for quiet ride and longevity. Factory size is LT225/75R16 which id like to stick to. Ive worn out some Michelin Agilis Cross Climate in about 60,000 miles. It looks like Michelin now calls the Agilis Cross Climate which i currently have the Cross Climate2. Looking for something similar. The Michelins are spendy, wondering if ill be happy with something different. Was looking at Firestone Transforce as a possibility. Open to any ideas and the collective experience of those here.”
“Yup. I currently have CrossClimate Load E on the front, and CrossClimate C-type on the rear. The van has never had a better ride. (Note to readers who are less familiar with different Interstate model years - mine is not a dually. I only have two tires to carry the butt-heavy rear, so the load rating consideration takes on an outsized importance). Price is the same, to within about ten bucks. C-type is not more expensive. The published disadvantage is a stiffer ride. But the ride is harsh anyway - we have discussed that ad nauseam on this forum. I don’t find that to be a deal-breaker for a tire with a larger load-carrying capacity. Especially given the still-unexplained blow-out I had with the lower-capacity tire. Back in the Catastrophic blowout thread, I mentioned that the C-type CrossClimate is not advertised. I had to have a Discount Tire CSR point me to their page for it. There’s a screengrab of it on that thread.”
Based on 54 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Firestone FR740 | B · Michelin Agilis CrossClimate |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All-Season tire | All Season |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Van |
| Sizes available | 3 | 22 |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 17″ | 15″ – 17″ |
| Tread depth | 9/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 300 A A | — |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | — |
| Max pressure | 44 psi | — |
| Sizes in common | 0 | 0 |
Which one should you actually buy?
Firestone FR740
Michelin Agilis CrossClimate
Winner: Michelin Agilis CrossClimate — better dry, wet and treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score. Firestone FR740 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 6 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Michelin Agilis CrossClimate scores 79 vs 49 on dry.
Michelin Agilis CrossClimate scores 78 vs 48 on wet.
Michelin Agilis CrossClimate scores 78 vs 49 on treadwear.
Michelin Agilis CrossClimate scores 78 vs 50 on snow.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
FR740 or Agilis CrossClimate?
Which is better in the wet, FR740 or Agilis CrossClimate?
Michelin Agilis CrossClimate, 78 vs 48 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, FR740 or Agilis CrossClimate?
Michelin Agilis CrossClimate, 79 vs 49 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, FR740 or Agilis CrossClimate?
Michelin Agilis CrossClimate, 78 vs 50 on our snow score.
Which is quieter, FR740 or Agilis CrossClimate?
Michelin Agilis CrossClimate, 76 vs 57 on our noise score.
Which is more comfortable, FR740 or Agilis CrossClimate?
Michelin Agilis CrossClimate, 71 vs 43 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, FR740 or Agilis CrossClimate?
Michelin Agilis CrossClimate, 78 vs 49 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology