Firestone FR740 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Firestone FR740 vs Michelin Agilis CrossClimate — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 3 road tests and 6 + 1,072 owner reviews. How we score

Agilis CrossClimate is ahead, 78–49

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Firestone FR740
Tire AFirestone

FR740

All-Season tire

± 8Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 38 · 6 reviews

Michelin Agilis CrossClimate
Tire BMichelin

Agilis CrossClimate

All Season

± 6

Tests 72 · 3 tests Owners 85 · 1,072 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 7 in 2020 Commercial Van All Season Tyre Test (dry braking)

“We have the Agilis cross climates on our C-class 3.5t MH and have been utterly delighted with them. They’re quiet, really grippy and give a great ride. What’s not to like?”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 49

    Dry

    Agilis CrossClimate +30
    79
    Why this score
    SourceFR740Agilis CrossClimate
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests≈ 56 (est.)74
    Reviews found online3987

    FR740: 60% × 55.9 (est.) + 40% × 38.6 = 49

    Agilis CrossClimate: 60% × 74.3 + 40% × 87 = 79

    No road tests of dry for FR740. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 48

    Wet

    Agilis CrossClimate +30
    78
    Why this score
    SourceFR740Agilis CrossClimate
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests≈ 54 (est.)71
    Reviews found online4088

    FR740: 60% × 53.8 (est.) + 40% × 39.7 = 48

    Agilis CrossClimate: 60% × 71.1 + 40% × 87.8 = 78

    No road tests of wet for FR740. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 50

    Snow

    Agilis CrossClimate +28
    78
    Why this score
    SourceFR740Agilis CrossClimate
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests≈ 59 (est.)76
    Reviews found online3582

    FR740: 60% × 59.3 (est.) + 40% × 35.2 = 50

    Agilis CrossClimate: 60% × 75.6 + 40% × 81.6 = 78

    No road tests of snow for FR740. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 43

    Comfort

    Agilis CrossClimate +28
    71
    Why this score
    SourceFR740Agilis CrossClimate
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 61 (est.)55
    Reviews found online3181

    FR740: 40% × 61.1 (est.) + 60% × 31 = 43

    Agilis CrossClimate: 40% × 54.8 + 60% × 81.1 = 71

    No road tests of comfort for FR740. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  5. 57

    Noise

    Agilis CrossClimate +19
    76
    Why this score
    SourceFR740Agilis CrossClimate
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests≈ 66 (est.)82
    Reviews found online44≈ 66 (est.)

    FR740: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 43.9 = 57

    Agilis CrossClimate: 60% × 82 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 76

    No road tests of noise for FR740. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

    No owner ratings of noise for Agilis CrossClimate. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  6. 49

    Treadwear

    Agilis CrossClimate +29
    78
    Why this score
    SourceFR740Agilis CrossClimate
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 56 (est.)≈ 73 (est.)
    Reviews found online3885

    FR740: 60% × 56.3 (est.) + 40% × 38.2 = 49

    Agilis CrossClimate: 60% × 73.2 (est.) + 40% × 85 = 78

    No road tests of treadwear for FR740. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

    No road tests of treadwear for Agilis CrossClimate. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. –

    Handling (owners)

    No comparison
    81
    Why this score
    SourceFR740Agilis CrossClimate
    Reviews found online–81
  8. –

    Efficiency

    No comparison
    71
    Why this score
    SourceFR740Agilis CrossClimate
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests–71
Scores at a glance
Firestone FR740 vs Michelin Agilis CrossClimate: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryFirestone FR740Michelin Agilis CrossClimate
Relative Score 49 78
Dry 49 79
Wet 48 78
Snow 50 78
Comfort 43 71
Noise 57 76
Treadwear 49 78
Handling (owners) – 81
Efficiency – 71

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

FR740

± 6

Agilis CrossClimate

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A FR740

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

Tire B Agilis CrossClimate

Pros

  • Outstanding wet and winter weather traction
  • Exceptional tread life and long-term durability
  • Stiff sidewalls providing enhanced cornering stability and handling

Cons

  • Slightly higher road noise or low drone at certain speeds
  • Higher initial purchase price compared to standard options
  • A few reports of a minor decrease in fuel economy
All owner themes in the Agilis CrossClimate review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Firestone FR740

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Tire B

Michelin Agilis CrossClimate

Positive

Community sentiment toward the Michelin Agilis CrossClimate is largely positive, with owners of vans, RVs, and heavy-duty trucks praising its wet and snow traction, quiet ride, and capability under heavy loads. However, discussions frequently highlight trade-offs such as faster tread wear compared to the Defender series and concerns regarding an NHTSA recall on certain C-metric sizes for snow traction marking non-compliance. Prospective buyers also note confusion regarding the differing directional C-metric and non-directional LT-metric designs.

forum.ih8mud.com ·5 upvotes ·2019-10-17

“Just an update. I emailed Michelin about the Agilis vs. Defender: My email: I am thinking of using LT 275/65/18 for my Land Cruiser. I cannot decide between Michelin Defender vs. Agilis CrossClimate. I do plan on taking my car off-roading over mild terrain (more rocky, less mud). My Land Cruiser is around 6000 lbs. I read that Agilis has double the nylon reinforcement as Defender and has a tougher sidewall. Are these things true? Is Agilis a tougher tire? On-road, is Agilis as quiet as Defender? How is the rolling resistance between the two (same size)? Thank you in advance. -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Michelin’s response: We would like to thank you for contacting us! We would recommend that Michelin Defender LTX M/S tires for your luxury SUV. The Michelin Defender LTX M/S tires are going to be quieter, due to the tread grooves been closer. Also, the rolling resistance will be a little better. The Michelin Agilis Cross Climate is an excellent tire that serves well for all weather performance and built with a little more strength for more heavier larger vehicles, like 2500 or 3500 trucks.”

bobistheoilguy.com ·2025-10-26

“Looking to replace my summer tires for my work van. I carry about 2,000 lbs of cargo and have another set of wheels&tires for snow. These would just be for pavement/highway use. Im looking for quiet ride and longevity. Factory size is LT225/75R16 which id like to stick to. Ive worn out some Michelin Agilis Cross Climate in about 60,000 miles. It looks like Michelin now calls the Agilis Cross Climate which i currently have the Cross Climate2. Looking for something similar. The Michelins are spendy, wondering if ill be happy with something different. Was looking at Firestone Transforce as a possibility. Open to any ideas and the collective experience of those here.”

airforums.com ·2021-06-28

“Yup. I currently have CrossClimate Load E on the front, and CrossClimate C-type on the rear. The van has never had a better ride. (Note to readers who are less familiar with different Interstate model years - mine is not a dually. I only have two tires to carry the butt-heavy rear, so the load rating consideration takes on an outsized importance). Price is the same, to within about ten bucks. C-type is not more expensive. The published disadvantage is a stiffer ride. But the ride is harsh anyway - we have discussed that ad nauseam on this forum. I don’t find that to be a deal-breaker for a tire with a larger load-carrying capacity. Especially given the still-unexplained blow-out I had with the lower-capacity tire. Back in the Catastrophic blowout thread, I mentioned that the C-type CrossClimate is not advertised. I had to have a Discount Tire CSR point me to their page for it. There’s a screengrab of it on that thread.”

Top themes
#Heavy load capability#Winter and snow traction#Tread wear longevity#Defender LTX comparison#C-metric recall notice#Ride comfort and noise#Van and RV use

Based on 54 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Firestone FR740 B · Michelin Agilis CrossClimate
CategoryAll-Season tireAll Season
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverVan
Sizes available322
Rim diameters15″ – 17″15″ – 17″
Tread depth9/32″—
UTQG300 A A—
SidewallBlackwall—
Max pressure44 psi—
Sizes in common00

Which one should you actually buy?

Firestone FR740

Michelin Agilis CrossClimate

Winner: Michelin Agilis CrossClimate — better dry, wet and treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score. Firestone FR740 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 6 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Michelin Agilis CrossClimate scores 79 vs 49 on dry.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Michelin Agilis CrossClimate scores 78 vs 48 on wet.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Michelin Agilis CrossClimate scores 78 vs 49 on treadwear.

Pick tire B You drive through snowy winters

Michelin Agilis CrossClimate scores 78 vs 50 on snow.

Tire A · Firestone FR740
Tire B · Michelin Agilis CrossClimate

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

FR740 or Agilis CrossClimate?

Which is better in the wet, FR740 or Agilis CrossClimate?

Michelin Agilis CrossClimate, 78 vs 48 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, FR740 or Agilis CrossClimate?

Michelin Agilis CrossClimate, 79 vs 49 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, FR740 or Agilis CrossClimate?

Michelin Agilis CrossClimate, 78 vs 50 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, FR740 or Agilis CrossClimate?

Michelin Agilis CrossClimate, 76 vs 57 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, FR740 or Agilis CrossClimate?

Michelin Agilis CrossClimate, 71 vs 43 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, FR740 or Agilis CrossClimate?

Michelin Agilis CrossClimate, 78 vs 49 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology