Head-to-head Updated

Firestone Multihawk 2 vs Toyo Proxes Comfort — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 15 road tests and 182 + 633 owner reviews. How we score

Proxes Comfort is ahead, 78–44

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Toyo Proxes Comfort
Tire BToyo

Proxes Comfort

Summer

± 5

Tests 76 · 15 tests Owners 79 · 633 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 11 in 2021 Sport Auto Summer Tyre Test (dry handling)

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 48

    Dry

    Proxes Comfort +35
    83
    Why this score
    SourceMultihawk 2Proxes Comfort
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 14 tests≈ 55 (est.)86
    Reviews found online3779

    Multihawk 2: 60% × 55.3 (est.) + 40% × 37.3 = 48

    Proxes Comfort: 60% × 86 + 40% × 78.7 = 83

    No road tests of dry for Multihawk 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 44

    Wet

    Proxes Comfort +37
    81
    Why this score
    SourceMultihawk 2Proxes Comfort
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 14 tests≈ 50 (est.)80
    Reviews found online3383

    Multihawk 2: 60% × 50.3 (est.) + 40% × 33.4 = 44

    Proxes Comfort: 60% × 80.1 + 40% × 82.6 = 81

    No road tests of wet for Multihawk 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 43

    Comfort

    Proxes Comfort +27
    70
    Why this score
    SourceMultihawk 2Proxes Comfort
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 61 (est.)59
    Reviews found online3178

    Multihawk 2: 40% × 61.1 (est.) + 60% × 31.1 = 43

    Proxes Comfort: 40% × 58.8 + 60% × 78.1 = 70

    No road tests of comfort for Multihawk 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  4. –

    Noise

    No comparison
    71
    Why this score
    SourceMultihawk 2Proxes Comfort
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 8 tests–74
    Reviews found online–≈ 66 (est.)

    Proxes Comfort: 60% × 73.8 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 71

    No owner ratings of noise for Proxes Comfort. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  5. 43

    Treadwear

    Proxes Comfort +28
    71
    Why this score
    SourceMultihawk 2Proxes Comfort
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 5 tests≈ 53 (est.)67
    Reviews found online2978

    Multihawk 2: 60% × 52.9 (est.) + 40% × 28.8 = 43

    Proxes Comfort: 60% × 67.2 + 40% × 77.5 = 71

    No road tests of treadwear for Multihawk 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  6. 37

    Handling (owners)

    Proxes Comfort +40
    77
    Why this score
    SourceMultihawk 2Proxes Comfort
    Reviews found online3777
  7. –

    Efficiency

    No comparison
    60
    Why this score
    SourceMultihawk 2Proxes Comfort
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 10 tests–60
Scores at a glance
Firestone Multihawk 2 vs Toyo Proxes Comfort: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryFirestone Multihawk 2Toyo Proxes Comfort
Relative Score 44 78
Dry 48 83
Wet 44 81
Comfort 43 70
Noise – 71
Treadwear 43 71
Handling (owners) 37 77
Efficiency – 60

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

Multihawk 2

± 5

Proxes Comfort

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

DisciplineCategoryMultihawk 2Proxes ComfortΔHead-to-head
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Overall Ranking Overall #12/14 2018 ADAC Summer Tyre Test - 175/65 R14 #11/52 2025 Summer Tyre Test Shootout – Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Multihawk 2

Pros

  • Reliable dry grip and handling performance
  • High ride comfort and low noise levels
  • Affordable price and good overall value

Cons

  • Poor wet-weather traction and dangerous sliding behavior in rain
  • Pronounced understeer on wet surfaces
  • Rapid tread wear reported by some users
All owner themes in the Multihawk 2 review

Tire B Proxes Comfort

Pros

  • Excellent wet weather grip and handling
  • Low road noise and quiet operation
  • Strong value for money and affordable pricing

Cons

  • Limited feedback and slight understeer when pushed hard
  • Some drivers experienced a firmer or less comfortable ride over bumps
  • Faster wear reported compared to premium long-lasting alternatives like Michelin
All owner themes in the Proxes Comfort review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Firestone Multihawk 2 B · Toyo Proxes Comfort
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available2263
Rim diameters13″ – 14″14″ – 20″
Sizes in common22

Which one should you actually buy?

Firestone Multihawk 2

Toyo Proxes Comfort

Winner: Toyo Proxes Comfort — better handling, wet and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Toyo Proxes Comfort scores 77 vs 37 on handling.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Toyo Proxes Comfort scores 81 vs 44 on wet.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Toyo Proxes Comfort scores 83 vs 48 on dry.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Toyo Proxes Comfort scores 71 vs 43 on treadwear.

Tire A · Firestone Multihawk 2
Tire B · Toyo Proxes Comfort

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Multihawk 2 or Proxes Comfort?

Which is better in the wet, Multihawk 2 or Proxes Comfort?

Toyo Proxes Comfort, 81 vs 44 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Multihawk 2 or Proxes Comfort?

Toyo Proxes Comfort, 83 vs 48 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, Multihawk 2 or Proxes Comfort?

Toyo Proxes Comfort, 70 vs 43 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Multihawk 2 or Proxes Comfort?

Toyo Proxes Comfort, 71 vs 43 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology