Head-to-head Updated

Michelin Primacy 4+ vs Toyo Proxes Comfort — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 10 + 15 road tests and 40 + 633 owner reviews. How we score

Too close to call: Primacy 4+ 78, Proxes Comfort 77.

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Michelin Primacy 4+
Tire AMichelin

Primacy 4+

Summer

± 4

Tests 85 · 10 tests Owners 71 · 40 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 16 in 2024 ADAC Summer Tyre Test (abrasion)

Toyo Proxes Comfort
Tire BToyo

Proxes Comfort

Summer

± 6

Tests 76 · 15 tests Owners 79 · 633 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 11 in 2021 Sport Auto Summer Tyre Test (dry handling)

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

Key facts

  • In 4 tests that measured dry braking for both, Primacy 4+ won 4 and Proxes Comfort won 0 (average 97% vs 96% of the best).
  • In 4 tests that measured wet braking for both, Primacy 4+ won 2 and Proxes Comfort won 2 (average 94% vs 91% of the best).
  • In 3 tests that measured straight aquaplaning for both, Primacy 4+ won 2 and Proxes Comfort won 1 (average 98% vs 95% of the best).
  1. 78

    Dry

    Proxes Comfort +5
    83
    Why this score
    SourcePrimacy 4+Proxes Comfort
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 9 / 14 tests8286
    Reviews found online7179
    Dry Braking (% of best) · 4 shared tests · wins 4–097%96%
    Dry Handling (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 1–199%99%

    Primacy 4+: 60% × 82.4 + 40% × 71 = 78

    Proxes Comfort: 60% × 86 + 40% × 78.7 = 83

  2. 79

    Wet

    Proxes Comfort +2
    81
    Why this score
    SourcePrimacy 4+Proxes Comfort
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 9 / 14 tests8280
    Reviews found online7583
    Curved Aquaplaning (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 1–194%93%
    Straight Aquaplaning (% of best) · 3 shared tests · wins 2–198%95%
    Wet Braking (% of best) · 4 shared tests · wins 2–294%91%
    Wet Braking (concrete) (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–093%91%
    Wet Handling (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 1–198%99%

    Primacy 4+: 60% × 82 + 40% × 74.6 = 79

    Proxes Comfort: 60% × 80.1 + 40% × 82.6 = 81

  3. 71

    Comfort

    Primacy 4+ +1
    70
    Why this score
    SourcePrimacy 4+Proxes Comfort
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 1 tests7359
    Reviews found online6978

    Primacy 4+: 40% × 72.9 + 60% × 69.4 = 71

    Proxes Comfort: 40% × 58.8 + 60% × 78.1 = 70

  4. 72

    Noise

    Primacy 4+ +1
    71
    Why this score
    SourcePrimacy 4+Proxes Comfort
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 7 / 8 tests7674
    Reviews found online≈ 66 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Noise (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 1–199%99%

    Primacy 4+: 60% × 76.4 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 72

    Proxes Comfort: 60% × 73.8 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 71

    No owner ratings of noise for Primacy 4+ or Proxes Comfort. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  5. 85

    Treadwear

    Primacy 4+ +14
    71
    Why this score
    SourcePrimacy 4+Proxes Comfort
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 4 / 5 tests9567
    Reviews found online7078
    Abrasion (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–065%46%
    Wear (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 2–086%56%

    Primacy 4+: 60% × 94.9 + 40% × 69.7 = 85

    Proxes Comfort: 60% × 67.2 + 40% × 77.5 = 71

  6. 67

    Handling (owners)

    Proxes Comfort +10
    77
    Why this score
    SourcePrimacy 4+Proxes Comfort
    Reviews found online6777
  7. 78

    Efficiency

    Primacy 4+ +18
    60
    Why this score
    SourcePrimacy 4+Proxes Comfort
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 8 / 10 tests7860
    Fuel Consumption (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–095%95%
    Rolling Resistance (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 1–191%90%
Scores at a glance
Michelin Primacy 4+ vs Toyo Proxes Comfort: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryMichelin Primacy 4+Toyo Proxes Comfort
Relative Score 78 77
Dry 78 83
Wet 79 81
Comfort 71 70
Noise 72 71
Treadwear 85 71
Handling (owners) 67 77
Efficiency 78 60

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 4

Primacy 4+

± 6

Proxes Comfort

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

In the overall rankings of 4 tests that ran both, Michelin Primacy 4+ finished ahead 4 times and Toyo Proxes Comfort 0 times.

DisciplineCategoryPrimacy 4+Proxes ComfortΔHead-to-head
Dry Braking Dry 97% 96% +1.2 4–0 in 4 shared tests Newest: 2024 Summer Tyre Market Overview · 205/55 R16
Dry Handling Dry 99% 99% +0.6 1–1 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2024 AutoBild Summer Tyre Test · 205/55 R16
Curved Aquaplaning Wet 94% 93% +1.2 1–1 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2024 AutoBild Summer Tyre Test · 205/55 R16
Straight Aquaplaning Wet 98% 95% +3.1 2–1 in 3 shared tests Newest: 2024 AutoBild Summer Tyre Test · 205/55 R16
Wet Braking Wet 94% 91% +2.5 2–2 in 4 shared tests Newest: 2024 Summer Tyre Market Overview · 205/55 R16
Wet Braking (concrete) Wet 93% 91% +2.7 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2023 ADAC Summer Tyre Test · 205/55 R16
Wet Handling Wet 98% 99% −0.4 1–1 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2024 AutoBild Summer Tyre Test · 205/55 R16
Noise Noise 99% 99% +0.1 1–1 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2024 AutoBild Summer Tyre Test · 205/55 R16
Abrasion Treadwear 65% 46% +18.9 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2023 ADAC Summer Tyre Test · 205/55 R16
Wear Treadwear 86% 56% +29.7 2–0 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2024 AutoBild Summer Tyre Test · 205/55 R16
Fuel Consumption Efficiency 95% 95% 0.0 0–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2023 ADAC Summer Tyre Test · 205/55 R16
Rolling Resistance Efficiency 91% 90% +1.6 1–1 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2024 AutoBild Summer Tyre Test · 205/55 R16
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Total Cost of Ownership Cost #9/20 #18/20 – 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2024 AutoBild Summer Tyre Test · 205/55 R16
Value Cost 59% 56% +2.8 2–0 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2024 AutoBild Summer Tyre Test · 205/55 R16
Overall Ranking Overall #5/55 #6/55 – 4–0 in 4 shared tests Newest: 2024 Summer Tyre Market Overview · 205/55 R16

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Primacy 4+

Pros

  • Strong wet and dry grip and braking confidence, often cited as a big improvement over Bridgestone, Dunlop and Nexen tyres, including on powerful cars and PHEVs that previously spun their tyres
  • Comfortable, compliant ride with soft sidewalls that suits softly sprung and family cars
  • Low and even tread wear, with several owners reporting little visible wear after 5,000–10,000 miles and one reporting about 60,000 km in hot climates

Cons

  • Road noise and drone, especially on rough asphalt, was described as severe by several owners (Skoda Yeti, Lexus), contradicting other reports of quiet running
  • Reduced grip and confidence in cold, damp conditions, with two UK owners saying the tyre behaves like a budget tyre
  • Premium pricing, with some owners questioning value when life fell short of expectations
All owner themes in the Primacy 4+ review

Tire B Proxes Comfort

Pros

  • Excellent wet weather grip and handling
  • Low road noise and quiet operation
  • Strong value for money and affordable pricing

Cons

  • Limited feedback and slight understeer when pushed hard
  • Some drivers experienced a firmer or less comfortable ride over bumps
  • Faster wear reported compared to premium long-lasting alternatives like Michelin
All owner themes in the Proxes Comfort review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Michelin Primacy 4+ B · Toyo Proxes Comfort
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available6663
Rim diameters16″ – 21″14″ – 20″
Sizes in common4242

Which one should you actually buy?

Michelin Primacy 4+

Toyo Proxes Comfort

Too close to call: Michelin Primacy 4+ and Toyo Proxes Comfort are within 2 points overall. Michelin Primacy 4+ is stronger on efficiency and treadwear. Toyo Proxes Comfort is stronger on handling and dry.

Pick tire A You want lower fuel or energy use

Michelin Primacy 4+ scores 78 vs 60 on efficiency.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Michelin Primacy 4+ scores 85 vs 71 on treadwear.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Toyo Proxes Comfort scores 77 vs 67 on handling.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Toyo Proxes Comfort scores 83 vs 78 on dry.

Tire A · Michelin Primacy 4+
Tire B · Toyo Proxes Comfort

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Primacy 4+ or Proxes Comfort?

Which is better in the wet, Primacy 4+ or Proxes Comfort?

Neither, by our numbers: 79 vs 81 on the wet score, within 3 points.

Which grips better on dry roads, Primacy 4+ or Proxes Comfort?

Toyo Proxes Comfort, 83 vs 78 on our dry score.

Which is quieter, Primacy 4+ or Proxes Comfort?

Neither, by our numbers: 72 vs 71 on the noise score, within 3 points.

Which is more comfortable, Primacy 4+ or Proxes Comfort?

Neither, by our numbers: 71 vs 70 on the comfort score, within 3 points.

Which lasts longer, Primacy 4+ or Proxes Comfort?

Michelin Primacy 4+, 85 vs 71 on our treadwear score.

Which rolls more easily, Primacy 4+ or Proxes Comfort?

Michelin Primacy 4+, 78 vs 60 on our efficiency score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology