tirewheelguide

Firestone Multihawk looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Firestone Multihawk vs Michelin Primacy 4+ — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 10 road tests and 16 + 40 owner reviews. How we score

Primacy 4+ is ahead, 78–70

Check price on Amazon · Primacy 4+ or Multihawk on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Firestone Multihawk
Tire AFirestone

Multihawk

Summer

± 8Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 70 · 16 reviews

Michelin Primacy 4+
Tire BMichelin

Primacy 4+

Summer

± 4

Tests 85 · 10 tests Owners 71 · 40 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 16 in 2024 ADAC Summer Tyre Test (abrasion)

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 70

    Dry

    Primacy 4+ +8
    78
    Why this score
    SourceMultihawkPrimacy 4+
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 9 tests≈ 69 (est.)82
    Reviews found online7171

    Multihawk: 60% × 69.3 (est.) + 40% × 71.2 = 70

    Primacy 4+: 60% × 82.4 + 40% × 71 = 78

    No road tests of dry for Multihawk. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 71

    Wet

    Primacy 4+ +8
    79
    Why this score
    SourceMultihawkPrimacy 4+
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 9 tests≈ 71 (est.)82
    Reviews found online7175

    Multihawk: 60% × 70.9 (est.) + 40% × 71.1 = 71

    Primacy 4+: 60% × 82 + 40% × 74.6 = 79

    No road tests of wet for Multihawk. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 65

    Comfort

    Primacy 4+ +6
    71
    Why this score
    SourceMultihawkPrimacy 4+
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 67 (est.)73
    Reviews found online6369

    Multihawk: 40% × 67.4 (est.) + 60% × 62.6 = 65

    Primacy 4+: 40% × 72.9 + 60% × 69.4 = 71

    No road tests of comfort for Multihawk. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  4. –

    Noise

    No comparison
    72
    Why this score
    SourceMultihawkPrimacy 4+
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 7 tests–76
    Reviews found online–≈ 66 (est.)

    Primacy 4+: 60% × 76.4 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 72

    No owner ratings of noise for Primacy 4+. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  5. 68

    Treadwear

    Primacy 4+ +17
    85
    Why this score
    SourceMultihawkPrimacy 4+
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 4 tests≈ 67 (est.)95
    Reviews found online6970

    Multihawk: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 68.8 = 68

    Primacy 4+: 60% × 94.9 + 40% × 69.7 = 85

    No road tests of treadwear for Multihawk. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  6. 70

    Handling (owners)

    Multihawk +3
    67
    Why this score
    SourceMultihawkPrimacy 4+
    Reviews found online7067
  7. –

    Efficiency

    No comparison
    78
    Why this score
    SourceMultihawkPrimacy 4+
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 8 tests–78
Scores at a glance
CategoryFirestone MultihawkMichelin Primacy 4+
Relative Score 70 78
Dry 70 78
Wet 71 79
Comfort 65 71
Noise – 72
Treadwear 68 85
Handling (owners) 70 67
Efficiency – 78

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

Multihawk

± 4

Primacy 4+

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

DisciplineCategoryMultihawkPrimacy 4+ΔHead-to-head
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Overall Ranking Overall #7/16 2014 ADAC 175/65 R14 Summer Tyre Test #4/8 2025 EV Tyre Test – Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Multihawk

Pros

  • Excellent price-to-performance ratio
  • Strong dry-weather grip and handling
  • Quiet and comfortable ride quality for daily commuting

Cons

  • Inconsistent wet-weather traction
  • Reports of premature tread wear or structural issues
  • Twitchy handling on uneven or poor road surfaces
All owner themes in the Multihawk review

Tire B Primacy 4+

Pros

  • Strong wet and dry grip and braking confidence, often cited as a big improvement over Bridgestone, Dunlop and Nexen tyres, including on powerful cars and PHEVs that previously spun their tyres
  • Comfortable, compliant ride with soft sidewalls that suits softly sprung and family cars
  • Low and even tread wear, with several owners reporting little visible wear after 5,000–10,000 miles and one reporting about 60,000 km in hot climates

Cons

  • Road noise and drone, especially on rough asphalt, was described as severe by several owners (Skoda Yeti, Lexus), contradicting other reports of quiet running
  • Reduced grip and confidence in cold, damp conditions, with two UK owners saying the tyre behaves like a budget tyre
  • Premium pricing, with some owners questioning value when life fell short of expectations
All owner themes in the Primacy 4+ review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Firestone Multihawk B · Michelin Primacy 4+
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available—66
Rim diameters—16″ – 21″
UTQG200 - 500 AA - B A - B—

Which one should you actually buy?

Firestone Multihawk

Michelin Primacy 4+

Winner: Michelin Primacy 4+ — better treadwear, dry and wet. Where the Firestone Multihawk is ahead, it is by less than 3 points. Firestone Multihawk rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 16 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Michelin Primacy 4+ scores 85 vs 68 on treadwear.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Michelin Primacy 4+ scores 78 vs 70 on dry.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Michelin Primacy 4+ scores 79 vs 71 on wet.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Michelin Primacy 4+ scores 71 vs 65 on comfort.

Tire A · Firestone Multihawk
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Michelin Primacy 4+
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Multihawk or Primacy 4+?

Which is better in the wet, Multihawk or Primacy 4+?

Michelin Primacy 4+, 79 vs 71 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Multihawk or Primacy 4+?

Michelin Primacy 4+, 78 vs 70 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, Multihawk or Primacy 4+?

Michelin Primacy 4+, 71 vs 65 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Multihawk or Primacy 4+?

Michelin Primacy 4+, 85 vs 68 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology