Head-to-head Updated

Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02 vs Nexen N Blue 4Season 2 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 13 + 10 road tests and 11 + 12 owner reviews. How we score

N Blue 4Season 2 is ahead, 75–69

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02
Tire AFirestone

MultiSeason Gen 02

All Season

± 6

Tests 65 · 13 tests Owners 74 · 11 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 9 in 2023 Auto Zeitung All Season Tyre Test (wet handling)

Nexen N Blue 4Season 2
Tire BNexen

N Blue 4Season 2

All Season

± 5

Tests 75 · 10 tests Owners 75 · 12 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 16 in 2026 ADAC All Season Tyre Test - 185/65 R15 (noise)

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

Key facts

  • In 5 tests that measured dry braking for both, MultiSeason Gen 02 won 0 and N Blue 4Season 2 won 5 (average 90% vs 95% of the best).
  • In 5 tests that measured wet braking for both, MultiSeason Gen 02 won 4 and N Blue 4Season 2 won 1 (average 89% vs 87% of the best).
  1. 70

    Dry

    N Blue 4Season 2 +9
    79
    Why this score
    SourceMultiSeason Gen 02N Blue 4Season 2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 12 / 10 tests6884
    Reviews found online7373
    Dry Braking (% of best) · 5 shared tests · wins 0–590%95%
    Dry Handling (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 0–298%99%

    MultiSeason Gen 02: 60% × 67.8 + 40% × 73.2 = 70

    N Blue 4Season 2: 60% × 83.8 + 40% × 72.8 = 79

  2. 78

    Wet

    MultiSeason Gen 02 +4
    74
    Why this score
    SourceMultiSeason Gen 02N Blue 4Season 2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 12 / 10 tests8072
    Reviews found online7678
    Curved Aquaplaning (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–174%85%
    Straight Aquaplaning (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 1–190%89%
    Wet Braking (% of best) · 5 shared tests · wins 4–189%87%
    Wet Circle (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–0100%95%
    Wet Handling (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 2–098%92%

    MultiSeason Gen 02: 60% × 79.7 + 40% × 76.4 = 78

    N Blue 4Season 2: 60% × 71.9 + 40% × 77.9 = 74

  3. 71

    Snow

    Level
    71
    Why this score
    SourceMultiSeason Gen 02N Blue 4Season 2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 6 / 7 tests7272
    Reviews found online6970
    Snow Braking (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 2–097%94%
    Snow Handling (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 1–194%93%
    Snow Slalom (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–192%93%
    Snow Traction (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 2–097%91%

    MultiSeason Gen 02: 60% × 72 + 40% × 69.3 = 71

    N Blue 4Season 2: 60% × 72 + 40% × 69.8 = 71

  4. 64

    Comfort

    N Blue 4Season 2 +2
    66
    Why this score
    SourceMultiSeason Gen 02N Blue 4Season 2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 2 tests5551
    Reviews found online7076
    Comfort (tester's mark) (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–058%50%

    MultiSeason Gen 02: 40% × 55.2 + 60% × 70.4 = 64

    N Blue 4Season 2: 40% × 51.2 + 60% × 75.8 = 66

  5. 65

    Noise

    N Blue 4Season 2 +13
    78
    Why this score
    SourceMultiSeason Gen 02N Blue 4Season 2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 6 / 7 tests6485
    Reviews found online≈ 67 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Noise (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 1–097%96%

    MultiSeason Gen 02: 60% × 64.1 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 65

    N Blue 4Season 2: 60% × 85.1 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 78

    No owner ratings of noise for MultiSeason Gen 02 or N Blue 4Season 2. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  6. 58

    Treadwear

    N Blue 4Season 2 +18
    76
    Why this score
    SourceMultiSeason Gen 02N Blue 4Season 2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 5 / 3 tests4774
    Reviews found online7478
    Wear (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–140%100%

    MultiSeason Gen 02: 60% × 47.4 + 40% × 74.3 = 58

    N Blue 4Season 2: 60% × 74.2 + 40% × 78.3 = 76

  7. 76

    Handling (owners)

    MultiSeason Gen 02 +1
    75
    Why this score
    SourceMultiSeason Gen 02N Blue 4Season 2
    Reviews found online7675
  8. 75

    Efficiency

    MultiSeason Gen 02 +5
    70
    Why this score
    SourceMultiSeason Gen 02N Blue 4Season 2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 6 / 7 tests7570
    Fuel Consumption (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–098%94%
    Rolling Resistance (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 1–192%88%
Scores at a glance
Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02 vs Nexen N Blue 4Season 2: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryFirestone MultiSeason Gen 02Nexen N Blue 4Season 2
Relative Score 69 75
Dry 70 79
Wet 78 74
Snow 71 71
Comfort 64 66
Noise 65 78
Treadwear 58 76
Handling (owners) 76 75
Efficiency 75 70

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 6

MultiSeason Gen 02

± 5

N Blue 4Season 2

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

In the overall rankings of 5 tests that ran both, Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02 finished ahead 2 times and Nexen N Blue 4Season 2 3 times.

DisciplineCategoryMultiSeason Gen 02N Blue 4Season 2ΔHead-to-head
Dry Braking Dry 90% 95% −4.9 0–5 in 5 shared tests Newest: 2025 All Season 30 Tyre Braking Test · 225/40 R18
Dry Handling Dry 98% 99% −0.7 0–2 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2023 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test · 225/45 R17
Curved Aquaplaning Wet 74% 85% −11.2 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2023 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test · 225/45 R17
Straight Aquaplaning Wet 90% 89% +1.1 1–1 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2023 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test · 225/45 R17
Wet Braking Wet 89% 87% +2.8 4–1 in 5 shared tests Newest: 2025 All Season 30 Tyre Braking Test · 225/40 R18
Wet Circle Wet 100% 95% +4.9 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2023 Auto Zeitung All Season Tyre Test · 215/55 R17
Wet Handling Wet 98% 92% +5.9 2–0 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2023 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test · 225/45 R17
Snow Braking Snow 97% 94% +3.1 2–0 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2023 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test · 225/45 R17
Snow Handling Snow 94% 93% +1.0 1–1 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2023 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test · 225/45 R17
Snow Slalom Snow 92% 93% −1.0 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2023 Auto Zeitung All Season Tyre Test · 215/55 R17
Snow Traction Snow 97% 91% +5.4 2–0 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2023 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test · 225/45 R17
Comfort (tester's mark) Comfort 58% 50% +8.3 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2023 Auto Zeitung All Season Tyre Test · 215/55 R17
Noise Noise 97% 96% +1.4 1–0 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2023 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test · 225/45 R17
Wear Treadwear 40% 100% −59.9 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2023 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test · 225/45 R17
Fuel Consumption Efficiency 98% 94% +3.3 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2023 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test · 225/45 R17
Rolling Resistance Efficiency 92% 88% +4.3 1–1 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2023 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test · 225/45 R17
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Total Cost of Ownership Cost #12/16 #1/16 – 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2023 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test · 225/45 R17
Value Cost 36% 100% −63.6 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2023 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test · 225/45 R17
Overall Ranking Overall #16/30 #20/30 – 2–3 in 5 shared tests Newest: 2025 All Season 30 Tyre Braking Test · 225/40 R18

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A MultiSeason Gen 02

Pros

  • Excellent traction and stability in wet, snowy, and icy conditions
  • Strong tread longevity and durability over high mileage
  • High value-for-money proposition compared to premium competitors

Cons

  • Noticeable road noise, particularly at higher speeds
  • Poor braking performance and safety concerns in high-temperature summer conditions
  • Potential for premature dry rotting or tread degradation in specific climates
All owner themes in the MultiSeason Gen 02 review

Tire B N Blue 4Season 2

Pros

  • Exceptionally quiet and comfortable ride quality
  • Strong value for money compared to premium alternatives
  • Reliable capability and grip in winter conditions, including snow and ice

Cons

  • Can feel somewhat squishy or lack precision during spirited driving
  • Not ideally suited for extreme handling or pushing the car to its absolute limits
  • Some limitations in tricky ice conditions compared to dedicated winter tires
All owner themes in the N Blue 4Season 2 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02 B · Nexen N Blue 4Season 2
CategoryAll SeasonAll Season
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available—118
Rim diameters—14″ – 21″

Which one should you actually buy?

Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02

Nexen N Blue 4Season 2

Winner: Nexen N Blue 4Season 2 — better treadwear, noise and dry. Pick the Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02 if efficiency and wet matter most to you.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Nexen N Blue 4Season 2 scores 76 vs 58 on treadwear.

Pick tire B You want a quieter cabin

Nexen N Blue 4Season 2 scores 78 vs 65 on noise.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Nexen N Blue 4Season 2 scores 79 vs 70 on dry.

Pick tire A You want lower fuel or energy use

Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02 scores 75 vs 70 on efficiency.

Tire A · Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02
Tire B · Nexen N Blue 4Season 2

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

MultiSeason Gen 02 or N Blue 4Season 2?

Which is better in the wet, MultiSeason Gen 02 or N Blue 4Season 2?

Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02, 78 vs 74 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, MultiSeason Gen 02 or N Blue 4Season 2?

Nexen N Blue 4Season 2, 79 vs 70 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, MultiSeason Gen 02 or N Blue 4Season 2?

Neither, by our numbers: 71 vs 71 on the snow score, within 3 points.

Which is quieter, MultiSeason Gen 02 or N Blue 4Season 2?

Nexen N Blue 4Season 2, 78 vs 65 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, MultiSeason Gen 02 or N Blue 4Season 2?

Neither, by our numbers: 64 vs 66 on the comfort score, within 3 points.

Which lasts longer, MultiSeason Gen 02 or N Blue 4Season 2?

Nexen N Blue 4Season 2, 76 vs 58 on our treadwear score.

Which rolls more easily, MultiSeason Gen 02 or N Blue 4Season 2?

Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02, 75 vs 70 on our efficiency score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology