Tests – · none yet Owners 39 · 26 reviews
Firestone Transforce AT vs Michelin Agilis CrossClimate — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.
Agilis CrossClimate is ahead, 76–48
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 72 · 2 tests Owners 81 · 1,061 reviews
“Agilis cross climate (LT metric) Not a ton of information in regard to this tire, but so far my experience has been extremely positive. Great traction in the wet and light snow and fuel mileage seems to have improved. I plan to update this post as I put more miles on them. They don’t have the cool factor I concerned myself with as a younger man, but they seem to be an excellent tire. Read more”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
49
Dry
Agilis CrossClimate +2877Why this score
Source Transforce AT Agilis CrossClimate Professional tests (TWG score) – 71 Reviews found online 39 85 -
46
Wet
Agilis CrossClimate +3177Why this score
Source Transforce AT Agilis CrossClimate Professional tests (TWG score) – 71 Reviews found online 37 84 -
55
Snow
Agilis CrossClimate +2176Why this score
Source Transforce AT Agilis CrossClimate Professional tests (TWG score) – 75 Reviews found online 45 79 -
52
Comfort
Agilis CrossClimate +2274Why this score
Source Transforce AT Agilis CrossClimate Reviews found online 36 80 -
62
Noise
Agilis CrossClimate +1274Why this score
Source Transforce AT Agilis CrossClimate Professional tests (TWG score) – 73 Reviews found online 56 76 -
45
Treadwear
Agilis CrossClimate +2772Why this score
Source Transforce AT Agilis CrossClimate Reviews found online 31 77 -
40
Handling
Agilis CrossClimate +4080Why this score
Source Transforce AT Agilis CrossClimate Reviews found online 40 80
Scores at a glance
| Category | Firestone Transforce AT | Michelin Agilis CrossClimate |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 48 | 76 |
| Dry | 49 | 77 |
| Wet | 46 | 77 |
| Snow | 55 | 76 |
| Comfort | 52 | 74 |
| Noise | 62 | 74 |
| Treadwear | 45 | 72 |
| Handling | 40 | 80 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Transforce AT
Agilis CrossClimate
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Transforce AT
Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.
Tire B Agilis CrossClimate
Pros
- Outstanding wet and winter weather traction
- Exceptional tread life and long-term durability
- Stiff sidewalls providing enhanced cornering stability and handling
Cons
- Slightly higher road noise or low drone at certain speeds
- Higher initial purchase price compared to standard options
- A few reports of a minor decrease in fuel economy
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Firestone Transforce AT
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Michelin Agilis CrossClimate
Community opinion on the Michelin Agilis CrossClimate is generally positive regarding its winter and wet traction capabilities for heavy vans and trucks, though users note potential trade-offs in rolling resistance and tread wear. Mention of a recall regarding snow traction also introduces mixed perspectives, while commercial vehicle and RV owners frequently consider it as a top alternative.
“Lapland - Tyre Advice - Michelin Agilis Crossclimate Grateful for the knowledge/experience of the good people of r/Finland . I ordinarily use studded tyres for my van, but planning a roadtrip down to Germany/France over the new year (so can't fit these). I've no experience with friction tyres on snow/ice, but have Michelin Agilis Crossclimate [ . These have the 3PMSF marking so I understand are technically legal in Finland for winter, but I'm not sure about safety/performance in Lapland (route being: Tornio, to Sweden and then down via Denmark.) Good to hear people's views, or if you've experience with these types of tyres in this environment? UPDATE: Really appreciate the comments and views put forward on this. By the debate it seems I’m not alone in being not clear about winter performance of a tyre rated 3PMSF but not a “true” Nordic friction tyre. It does not make economic sense to buy new winter friction tyres for a road trip. So thinking about packing the Michelins, driving the studded tyre and getting them swapped/stored in Denmark or South Sweden and then swapping back on return. A pain in ass, a waste of space but the least risky approach. If anyone’s done similar let me know your experience.”
“Anyone tried Michelin Agilis CrossClimate tires on a Bolt? Following the info from I have picked up some used 15" Sonic wheels for winter use here in Maine. I can get Michelin Ice snow tires in an equivalent 15" size (to match the circumference of the stock tire/wheel) but not Cross Climate 2s. However, this Agilis is available in a near equivalent. It appears to be a heavier tire designed primarily for delivery vans Google AI suggests it has a slightly higher rolling resistance to the CC2s, which many report to have about a 10% hit on range - although any new tire will be less efficient than a well-worn one, so we should take that info with a grain of salt The Michelin Energy Saver tires are obviously more efficient, but also rated poor for use in snow. I'm a bit torn between "proper" snow tires and the Agilis, which I could run all year round One other factor is that smaller wheels tend to be more efficient - to a noticeable extent on EVs, so it just might be a wash as far as efficiency goes Read more”
“Agilis Crossclimate vs Agilis LTX as a summer tire for a pickup? Daily driver Chevy 3/4 ton pickup. I've got a set of winter tires that I run from Nov-Mar but I need to replace my summer tires. Mediterranean climate, so dry summers. 99% of my driving is city/highway, maybe 1-5 days per year on dry dirt roads. I'd like to go with the crossclimate since they're about $200 cheaper for the set. I guess the Defender LTX just got rebranded Agilis LTX. I know the Defender LTX is a very popular light truck tire. Y'all think I can get away with the crossclimate and save a couple hundred bucks? Read more”
Based on 9 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Firestone Transforce AT | B · Michelin Agilis CrossClimate |
|---|---|---|
| Category | — | All Season |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | Van |
| Sizes available | 2 | 22 |
| Rim diameters | 17″ – 20″ | 15″ – 17″ |
| Tread depth | 17/32″ | — |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | — |
| Max pressure | 80 psi | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
Firestone Transforce AT
Michelin Agilis CrossClimate
Winner: Michelin Agilis CrossClimate — better handling, wet and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Michelin Agilis CrossClimate scores 80 vs 40 on handling.
Michelin Agilis CrossClimate scores 77 vs 46 on wet.
Michelin Agilis CrossClimate scores 77 vs 49 on dry.
Michelin Agilis CrossClimate scores 72 vs 45 on treadwear.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.