Tests – · 1 test Owners 64 · 24 reviews
Firestone WeatherGrip vs Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 Connect — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 1 + 3 road tests and 24 + 9 owner reviews. How we score
Pilot Sport Cup 2 Connect is ahead, 70–65
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 73 · 3 tests Owners 66 · 9 reviews
Best test result: #3 of 10 in 2022 Sport Auto UHP, UUHP and Semi Slick Tyre Test (dry handling)
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
65
Dry
Pilot Sport Cup 2 Connect +974Why this score
Source WeatherGrip Pilot Sport Cup 2 Connect Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests ≈ 66 (est.) 74 Reviews found online 63 76 WeatherGrip: 60% × 65.8 (est.) + 40% × 62.8 = 65
Pilot Sport Cup 2 Connect: 60% × 73.6 + 40% × 75.6 = 74
No road tests of dry for WeatherGrip. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
70
Wet
Pilot Sport Cup 2 Connect +272Why this score
Source WeatherGrip Pilot Sport Cup 2 Connect Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests ≈ 70 (est.) 74 Reviews found online 70 68 WeatherGrip: 60% × 70.2 (est.) + 40% × 69.7 = 70
Pilot Sport Cup 2 Connect: 60% × 73.7 + 40% × 68.4 = 72
No road tests of wet for WeatherGrip. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
74
Snow
No comparison–Why this score
Source WeatherGrip Pilot Sport Cup 2 Connect Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 72 (est.) – Reviews found online 77 – WeatherGrip: 60% × 72.4 (est.) + 40% × 76.5 = 74
No road tests of snow for WeatherGrip. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
64
Comfort
Pilot Sport Cup 2 Connect +367Why this score
Source WeatherGrip Pilot Sport Cup 2 Connect Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 62 66 WeatherGrip: 40% × 67.2 (est.) + 60% × 61.6 = 64
Pilot Sport Cup 2 Connect: 40% × 68.1 (est.) + 60% × 65.8 = 67
No road tests of comfort for WeatherGrip. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for Pilot Sport Cup 2 Connect. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
67
Noise
Pilot Sport Cup 2 Connect +269Why this score
Source WeatherGrip Pilot Sport Cup 2 Connect Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 66 (est.) 70 Reviews found online 69 ≈ 66 (est.) WeatherGrip: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 68.8 = 67
Pilot Sport Cup 2 Connect: 60% × 70 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 69
No road tests of noise for WeatherGrip. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
No owner ratings of noise for Pilot Sport Cup 2 Connect. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
-
55
Treadwear
Pilot Sport Cup 2 Connect +358Why this score
Source WeatherGrip Pilot Sport Cup 2 Connect Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests 56 ≈ 62 (est.) Reviews found online 54 53 WeatherGrip: 60% × 56 + 40% × 53.9 = 55
Pilot Sport Cup 2 Connect: 60% × 61.8 (est.) + 40% × 53.4 = 58
No road tests of treadwear for Pilot Sport Cup 2 Connect. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
61
Handling (owners)
Pilot Sport Cup 2 Connect +1374Why this score
Source WeatherGrip Pilot Sport Cup 2 Connect Reviews found online 61 74 -
–
Efficiency
No comparison67Why this score
Source WeatherGrip Pilot Sport Cup 2 Connect Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests – 67
Scores at a glance
| Category | Firestone WeatherGrip | Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 Connect |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 65 | 70 |
| Dry | 65 | 74 |
| Wet | 70 | 72 |
| Snow | 74 | – |
| Comfort | 64 | 67 |
| Noise | 67 | 69 |
| Treadwear | 55 | 58 |
| Handling (owners) | 61 | 74 |
| Efficiency | – | 67 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
WeatherGrip
Pilot Sport Cup 2 Connect
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | WeatherGrip | Pilot Sport Cup 2 Connect | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #8/8 2022 Consumer Reports All-Season Tires | #8/11 2022 Tire Rack Extreme Performance Track Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A WeatherGrip
Pros
- Outstanding snow and winter weather traction
- Confident wet weather and rain grip
- Smooth and comfortable ride quality
Cons
- Faster tread wear due to the softer rubber compound
- Noticeable drop in fuel economy (MPG)
- Subpar dry pavement performance compared to dedicated summer or standard all-season tires
Tire B Pilot Sport Cup 2 Connect
Pros
- Significant lap time improvements and reliable dry grip
- Enhanced wet performance and aquaplaning resistance compared to predecessor tires
- Surprising daily driving comfort and compliance
Cons
- Initial tread scrubbing and vibration when brand new
- Can struggle under extremely high track temperatures (e.g., 54C)
- Some users reported soft sidewalls or vague feedback near the limit
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Firestone WeatherGrip | B · Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 Connect |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Weather | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 49 | — |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 19″ | — |
| Tread depth | 10/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 640 A A | — |
| Treadwear warranty | 65,000 mi | — |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | — |
| Max pressure | 44 psi | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
Firestone WeatherGrip
Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 Connect
Winner: Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 Connect — better handling, dry and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 Connect scores 74 vs 61 on handling.
Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 Connect scores 74 vs 65 on dry.
Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 Connect scores 67 vs 64 on comfort.
Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 Connect scores 58 vs 55 on treadwear.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
WeatherGrip or Pilot Sport Cup 2 Connect?
Which is better in the wet, WeatherGrip or Pilot Sport Cup 2 Connect?
Neither, by our numbers: 70 vs 72 on the wet score, within 3 points.
Which grips better on dry roads, WeatherGrip or Pilot Sport Cup 2 Connect?
Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 Connect, 74 vs 65 on our dry score.
Which is quieter, WeatherGrip or Pilot Sport Cup 2 Connect?
Neither, by our numbers: 67 vs 69 on the noise score, within 3 points.
Which is more comfortable, WeatherGrip or Pilot Sport Cup 2 Connect?
Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 Connect, 67 vs 64 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, WeatherGrip or Pilot Sport Cup 2 Connect?
Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 Connect, 58 vs 55 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology