Tests – · none yet Owners 56 · 28 reviews
Firestone Winterforce 2 vs Hankook Winter i cept evo2 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 5 road tests and 28 + 28 owner reviews. How we score
Winter i cept evo2 is ahead, 69–60
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 67 · 5 tests Owners 71 · 28 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 10 in 2017 Sport Auto Winter Tyre Test (snow braking)
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
50
Dry
Winter i cept evo2 +1767Why this score
Source Winterforce 2 Winter i cept evo2 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 5 tests ≈ 57 (est.) 65 Reviews found online 41 71 Winterforce 2: 60% × 56.8 (est.) + 40% × 40.8 = 50
Winter i cept evo2: 60% × 64.8 + 40% × 70.8 = 67
No road tests of dry for Winterforce 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
65
Wet
Winter i cept evo2 +671Why this score
Source Winterforce 2 Winter i cept evo2 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 5 tests ≈ 66 (est.) 70 Reviews found online 63 73 Winterforce 2: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 62.7 = 65
Winter i cept evo2: 60% × 70.2 + 40% × 73.4 = 71
No road tests of wet for Winterforce 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
74
Snow
Winterforce 2 +470Why this score
Source Winterforce 2 Winter i cept evo2 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 5 tests ≈ 72 (est.) 72 Reviews found online 77 66 Winterforce 2: 60% × 72.5 (est.) + 40% × 76.6 = 74
Winter i cept evo2: 60% × 72 + 40% × 66.1 = 70
No road tests of snow for Winterforce 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
51
Comfort
Winter i cept evo2 +1970Why this score
Source Winterforce 2 Winter i cept evo2 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 64 (est.) ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online 43 71 Winterforce 2: 40% × 63.5 (est.) + 60% × 43.1 = 51
Winter i cept evo2: 40% × 69 (est.) + 60% × 70.6 = 70
No road tests of comfort for Winterforce 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for Winter i cept evo2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
58
Noise
Winterforce 2 +355Why this score
Source Winterforce 2 Winter i cept evo2 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 4 tests ≈ 66 (est.) 47 Reviews found online 46 ≈ 66 (est.) Winterforce 2: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 46 = 58
Winter i cept evo2: 60% × 47.4 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 55
No road tests of noise for Winterforce 2. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
No owner ratings of noise for Winter i cept evo2. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
-
59
Treadwear
Winter i cept evo2 +1170Why this score
Source Winterforce 2 Winter i cept evo2 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 62 (est.) 67 Reviews found online 54 73 Winterforce 2: 60% × 62 (est.) + 40% × 54.1 = 59
Winter i cept evo2: 60% × 67.3 + 40% × 72.8 = 70
No road tests of treadwear for Winterforce 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
49
Handling (owners)
Winter i cept evo2 +2473Why this score
Source Winterforce 2 Winter i cept evo2 Reviews found online 49 73 -
–
Efficiency
No comparison59Why this score
Source Winterforce 2 Winter i cept evo2 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 4 tests – 59
Scores at a glance
| Category | Firestone Winterforce 2 | Hankook Winter i cept evo2 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 60 | 69 |
| Dry | 50 | 67 |
| Wet | 65 | 71 |
| Snow | 74 | 70 |
| Comfort | 51 | 70 |
| Noise | 58 | 55 |
| Treadwear | 59 | 70 |
| Handling (owners) | 49 | 73 |
| Efficiency | – | 59 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Winterforce 2
Winter i cept evo2
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | Winterforce 2 | Winter i cept evo2 | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #16/15 2022 Consumer Reports Winter Tires | #5/11 2019 19 Inch Performance Winter Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Winterforce 2
Pros
- Exceptional traction and capability in deep snow
- Highly competitive price point
- Reliable performance for daily winter commuting
Cons
- Increased road noise compared to all-season tires
- Noticeable 'mushy' or soft handling feedback on dry pavement
- Limited performance on ice without studs
Tire B Winter i cept evo2
Pros
- Impressive grip and traction on snow and ice
- High level of ride comfort and low noise levels
- Good value for money compared to higher-priced premium alternatives
Cons
- Soft sidewalls or goofy feel on dry roads, particularly in warmer winter temperatures
- Performance and grip degrade significantly as the tire ages over multiple seasons
- Can struggle to put down high torque/power on rear-wheel-drive vehicles
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Firestone Winterforce 2 | B · Hankook Winter i cept evo2 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Winter Premium Touring tires | Winter |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 31 | 79 |
| Rim diameters | 14″ – 18″ | 15″ – 22″ |
| Tread depth | 12/32″ | — |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | — |
| Max pressure | 44 psi | — |
| Sizes in common | 20 | 20 |
Which one should you actually buy?
Firestone Winterforce 2
Hankook Winter i cept evo2
Winner: Hankook Winter i cept evo2 — better handling, comfort and dry. Pick the Firestone Winterforce 2 if snow and noise matter most to you.
Hankook Winter i cept evo2 scores 73 vs 49 on handling.
Hankook Winter i cept evo2 scores 70 vs 51 on comfort.
Hankook Winter i cept evo2 scores 67 vs 50 on dry.
Hankook Winter i cept evo2 scores 70 vs 59 on treadwear.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Winterforce 2 or Winter i cept evo2?
Which is better in the wet, Winterforce 2 or Winter i cept evo2?
Hankook Winter i cept evo2, 71 vs 65 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Winterforce 2 or Winter i cept evo2?
Hankook Winter i cept evo2, 67 vs 50 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, Winterforce 2 or Winter i cept evo2?
Firestone Winterforce 2, 74 vs 70 on our snow score.
Which is quieter, Winterforce 2 or Winter i cept evo2?
Firestone Winterforce 2, 58 vs 55 on our noise score.
Which is more comfortable, Winterforce 2 or Winter i cept evo2?
Hankook Winter i cept evo2, 70 vs 51 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Winterforce 2 or Winter i cept evo2?
Hankook Winter i cept evo2, 70 vs 59 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology