Tests – · none yet Owners 57 · 28 reviews
Yokohama iceGUARD iG52c looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Head-to-head
Updated
Firestone Winterforce 2 vs Yokohama iceGUARD iG52c — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 28 + 1 owner reviews. How we score
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners – · 1 review (needs 5)
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
51
Dry
No comparison–Why this score
Source Winterforce 2 iceGUARD iG52c Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 57 (est.) – Reviews found online 42 – Winterforce 2: 60% × 57.1 (est.) + 40% × 42 = 51
No road tests of dry for Winterforce 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
65
Wet
No comparison–Why this score
Source Winterforce 2 iceGUARD iG52c Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) – Reviews found online 63 – Winterforce 2: 60% × 66.5 (est.) + 40% × 63.1 = 65
No road tests of wet for Winterforce 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
75
Snow
No comparison–Why this score
Source Winterforce 2 iceGUARD iG52c Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 73 (est.) – Reviews found online 77 – Winterforce 2: 60% × 73.2 (est.) + 40% × 77.3 = 75
No road tests of snow for Winterforce 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).
-
52
Comfort
No comparison–Why this score
Source Winterforce 2 iceGUARD iG52c Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 65 (est.) – Reviews found online 44 – Winterforce 2: 40% × 64.5 (est.) + 60% × 44.2 = 52
No road tests of comfort for Winterforce 2. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
59
Noise
No comparison–Why this score
Source Winterforce 2 iceGUARD iG52c Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) – Reviews found online 47 – Winterforce 2: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 46.7 = 59
No road tests of noise for Winterforce 2. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
59
Treadwear
No comparison–Why this score
Source Winterforce 2 iceGUARD iG52c Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 62 (est.) – Reviews found online 54 – Winterforce 2: 60% × 61.9 (est.) + 40% × 54 = 59
No road tests of treadwear for Winterforce 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
-
49
Handling (owners)
No comparison–Why this score
Source Winterforce 2 iceGUARD iG52c Reviews found online 49 –
Scores at a glance
| Category | Firestone Winterforce 2 | Yokohama iceGUARD iG52c |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 61 | – |
| Dry | 51 | – |
| Wet | 65 | – |
| Snow | 75 | – |
| Comfort | 52 | – |
| Noise | 59 | – |
| Treadwear | 59 | – |
| Handling (owners) | 49 | – |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
61
/ 100
Winterforce 2
–
/ 100
iceGUARD iG52c
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
In the overall rankings of 1 tests that ran both, Firestone Winterforce 2 finished ahead 0 times and Yokohama iceGUARD iG52c 1 times.
| Discipline | Category | Winterforce 2 | iceGUARD iG52c | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #17/17 | #14/17 | – | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2020 Consumer Reports North America Winter Tyre Test · 215/60 R16 |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Winterforce 2
Pros
- Exceptional traction and capability in deep snow
- Highly competitive price point
- Reliable performance for daily winter commuting
Cons
- Increased road noise compared to all-season tires
- Noticeable 'mushy' or soft handling feedback on dry pavement
- Limited performance on ice without studs
Tire B iceGUARD iG52c
Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Firestone Winterforce 2 | B · Yokohama iceGUARD iG52c |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Winter Premium Touring tires | Premium Touring Winter tire |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 31 | — |
| Rim diameters | 14″ – 18″ | — |
| Tread depth | 12/32″ | 11/32″ |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | 44 psi | 51 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
61
/ 100
Firestone Winterforce 2
–
/ 100
Yokohama iceGUARD iG52c
Only Firestone Winterforce 2 has enough test and review data for a Relative Score, so there is no head-to-head winner yet.
Tire A · Firestone Winterforce 2
Tire B · Yokohama iceGUARD iG52c
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology