Head-to-head Updated

Firestone Winterhawk vs Continental SportContact 7 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Tire AFirestone

Winterhawk

Winter Touring tires

Tests – · none yet Owners 74 · 1 review

Tests 83 · 22 tests Owners 82 · 1,570 reviews

“I've had PS4S and SC7 on my GR Yaris. Each at least 40k km. Grip levels; very similar, both wet and dry. Handling characteristics: PS4 slightly awkward on the limit (better after they warm up), Continental feels more progressive, like softer. The real difference is track wear. None of them should be driven on track for longer periods. 10min sessions are fine. If you go over it, Conti will dissintegrate in a few hours on track. PS4S might take almost double that the milage. I like both, so it comes to your preference considering Handling on the limit and price. I'd take Michelin if price on them is visibly less than double of Conti. Searching for new tyres now and picking beetween Pirelli PZ5 and BRIDGESTONE POTENZA SPORT EVO”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. –

    Dry

    No comparison
    94
    Why this score
    SourceWinterhawkSportContact 7
    Professional tests (TWG score)–96
    Reviews found online–91
  2. –

    Wet

    No comparison
    92
    Why this score
    SourceWinterhawkSportContact 7
    Professional tests (TWG score)–94
    Reviews found online–88
  3. –

    Comfort

    No comparison
    64
    Why this score
    SourceWinterhawkSportContact 7
    Professional tests (TWG score)–56
    Reviews found online–76
  4. –

    Noise

    No comparison
    62
    Why this score
    SourceWinterhawkSportContact 7
    Professional tests (TWG score)–59
  5. –

    Treadwear

    No comparison
    69
    Why this score
    SourceWinterhawkSportContact 7
    Professional tests (TWG score)–72
    Reviews found online–66
  6. –

    Handling

    No comparison
    89
    Why this score
    SourceWinterhawkSportContact 7
    Reviews found online–89
Scores at a glance
Firestone Winterhawk vs Continental SportContact 7: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryFirestone WinterhawkContinental SportContact 7
Relative Score – 83
Dry – 94
Wet – 92
Comfort – 64
Noise – 62
Treadwear – 69
Handling – 89

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Winterhawk

SportContact 7

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Winterhawk

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

Tire B SportContact 7

Pros

  • Phenomenal wet and dry grip with high cornering limits
  • Precise steering response and excellent road feedback
  • Strong braking performance and high stability at speed

Cons

  • Faster-than-average tread wear, especially with spirited driving or track use
  • Stiff sidewalls can contribute to a harsher, bumpier ride
  • Elevated road noise reported on certain road surfaces
All owner themes in the SportContact 7 review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Firestone Winterhawk

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Tire B

Continental SportContact 7

Positive

Community opinion on the Continental SportContact 7 is overwhelmingly positive regarding its exceptional grip, direct steering response, and wet weather performance, often rivaling or beating the Michelin Pilot Sport 4S. However, users frequently note trade-offs in tread life, reporting faster wear and lower initial tread depth compared to touring-oriented tires.

Top themes
#exceptional dry and wet grip#fast tread wear and longevity#steering response and handling#comparison with Michelin PS4S#ride comfort and road noise#track performance vs street use

Based on 58 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Firestone Winterhawk B · Continental SportContact 7
CategoryWinter Touring tiresSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available3123
Rim diameters13″18″ – 24″
Tread depth—8 - 9/32″
UTQG—240 AA A
Sidewall—Black Side Wall
Max pressure—50 - 51 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

Firestone Winterhawk

Continental SportContact 7

Only Continental SportContact 7 has enough test and review data for a Relative Score, so there is no head-to-head winner yet.

Tire A · Firestone Winterhawk
Tire B · Continental SportContact 7

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.